1 / 16

Priority SETTING Exercise

Priority SETTING Exercise. What does ATTRACTIVENESS mean. POTENTIAL BENEFITS. ATTRACTIVENESS. ABLE TO CAPTURE BENEFITS. POTENTIAL TO DELIVER. FEASIBILITY. ABILITY TO WORK THE SOLUTION. What does FEASIBILITY mean:. Potential to Deliver Service. FEASIBILITY.

nita
Download Presentation

Priority SETTING Exercise

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Priority SETTING Exercise

  2. What does ATTRACTIVENESS mean POTENTIAL BENEFITS ATTRACTIVENESS ABLE TO CAPTURE BENEFITS

  3. POTENTIAL TO DELIVER FEASIBILITY ABILITY TO WORK THE SOLUTION What does FEASIBILITY mean:

  4. Potential to Deliver Service FEASIBILITY Ability to Work the Solution BUILDING CONSENSUS ON THE PROPOSED SOLUTION Potential Benefits ATTRACTIVENESS Ability to Capture Benefits

  5. Scoring Your Evaluation We encourage you to make your evaluation as an MAIN ACTOR IN THIS PROCESS Very Good Very poor Good 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

  6. Hillside StabilizationScope of activities • Construction of check dams • Contour planting • Soil Erosion Prevention

  7. Farmer Knowledge & Experience • Use of Agro Eco-System Analysis: AESA Commitment of Farmers to sharing and supporting Farmers’ experiences

  8. Empowerment means Action For Hillside Farmers Scope of activities • Composting • Fire guardianship • Protection of water courses • Ecological Crop Management

  9. Challenges Entrenched attitudes • Conflict between livelihood concerns and sustainable development • Individual wealth vs Social Well-being • Conflict between addressing farmers felt needs vs limiting farmers individual options

  10. Services Required • Assistance with infrastructural development • Security of tenure • Easily accessible and reasonably priced agro inputs • Marketing of produce • Information • General info on production • More specific and timely info on crop saving interventions • Investment capital

  11. Building capacity • Present limitations • Finance • Personalities/leadership • Present Potential • Delivery of services • Sharing of relevant knowledge

  12. Collaboration in community action • NGO’s operating within the watersheds • Farmers Organizations • Village councils • CEPEP • Others • Need for collaboration • Similar development agendas • Same people in key positions

  13. Individual Farmer Options Attractiveness Feasible

  14. Collaboration Options Attractiveness Feasible

  15. Getting Better Services Attractiveness Feasible

  16. HOW WE RANK THE PREFERENCES EXPRESSED STRONG SUPPORT SELECTED EMPHASIS ATTRACTIVENESS Very little Support FEASIBILITY

More Related