1 / 75

Caitlin Madevu-Matson (cm3315@columbia.edu) Charon Gwynn (crg2128@columbia.edu) SI-NY

Insights into HIV Care Service Comprehensiveness and Laboratory Capacity at ICAP-supported Facilities: Findings from PFaCTS 2013. Caitlin Madevu-Matson (cm3315@columbia.edu) Charon Gwynn (crg2128@columbia.edu) SI-NY. PFaCTS.

nishan
Download Presentation

Caitlin Madevu-Matson (cm3315@columbia.edu) Charon Gwynn (crg2128@columbia.edu) SI-NY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Insights into HIV Care Service Comprehensiveness and Laboratory Capacity at ICAP-supported Facilities: Findings from PFaCTS 2013 Caitlin Madevu-Matson (cm3315@columbia.edu)Charon Gwynn (crg2128@columbia.edu)SI-NY

  2. PFaCTS • Structured repeated assessment of facilities to describe the scope, diversity, capacity and comprehensiveness of ICAP-supported programs • Captures information not available from routine indicators : • Context: Location, type • Facility characteristics: Related services, e.g. ANC, MC • Clinic and lab components: Staffing configuration and training, patient support services, laboratory quality essentials • Data used for program planning, monitoring and evaluation • Reports and webinars • URS • Analyses with other data sources

  3. PFaCTS Implementation • Care and Treatment PFaCTS • 7 rounds, 2007 - 2013 • 80 questions • Laboratory PFaCTS • 2 rounds, 2011 - 2013 • 162 questions • Assessment tools • Core questions maintained from previous round, tool revised with clinical and programs units • Data collection • Assessments completed with health facility personnel • Questionnaires reviewed by in-country ICAP clinical and M&E units • Data validated through checks and results uploaded to URS

  4. CARE & TREATMENT PFaCTS Objectives • Present results from Care and treatment PFaCTS Round 7 • Describe the comprehensiveness of ICAP-supported programs

  5. PFaCTS implementation Current characteristics Context Facility Clinic Comprehensiveness of HIV Care Service Summary Implications Outline

  6. Definitions Facility Clinic

  7. Completeness of PFaCTS reportingover time

  8. Completeness of PFaCTS reportingover time 96% 75%

  9. PFaCTS implementation Current characteristics Context : country, location and type Facility : services provided outside the CT clinic Clinic : services provided in the CT clinic Comprehensiveness of HIV Care Service Summary Implications Outline

  10. Countries contributing to PFaCTS Round 7 • 96% (1017/1062) of facilities with ICAP-supported care and treatment services completed PFaCTS Round 7 • In country completeness ranged from 79% to 100%

  11. Facility location and Type

  12. Availability of HIV related services (n=1017)

  13. PMTCT Service Variation (n=991)

  14. TB service Variation (n=1,017)

  15. Availability of key patient support services (n=1017)

  16. Type of ART adherence support available

  17. Outreach activities by type of personnel

  18. Secondary prevention service availability

  19. PFaCTS implementation Current characteristics Context Facility Clinic Comprehensiveness of HIV Care Service Summary Implications Outline

  20. HIV Care Comprehensiveness Components Questions • Does ICAP support comprehensive HIV care programs? • Has comprehensiveness of HIV care programs changed over time? • Is there variability in the changes?

  21. Comprehensive Services over time

  22. Comprehensive Services over time, subset

  23. Comprehensive Services over time, by facility type

  24. PFaCTS implementation Current characteristics Context Facility Clinic Comprehensiveness of HIV Care Service Summary Implications Outline

  25. CT Summary (1) • Overall, ICAP facilities maintained high survey completeness • High on-site availability of essential HIV care services • Counseling and testing • PMTCT • TB treatment • ART adherence counseling • Outreach • Nutritional counseling • Secondary prevention

  26. CT Summary (2) • The comprehensiveness of essential HIV care services at all ICAP-supported facilities increased rapidly in 2009 and seems to have stabilized • Higher proportion of facilities have comprehensive services in • Facilities supported by ICAP for longer time • Public primary and secondary/tertiary compared to private/other

  27. Implications for HIV care and treatment • ICAP-supported facilities provide comprehensive services even though most facilities are rural and public primary facilities • Scale up and expansion of ICAP support to new areas may mean not all facilities will be equipped to offer comprehensive services • Combine PFaCTS results with routinely collected program and clinical data • Confirm if availability of comprehensive services is beneficial for program and patient outcomes • Advocate for wider implementation of comprehensive service delivery models

  28. Laboratory PFaCTS

  29. Outline • Rationale & Objectives • General findings • Capacity score • Summary& Implications

  30. Laboratory PFaCTS • Captures information on the scope, diversity, and capacity of ICAP-supported laboratories • Provides information on laboratory quality essentials (QEs) • Infrastructure and equipment • Human resources • Quality assurance activities • Facility safety • Supply chain management • Two rounds of PFaCTS conducted to date (2011 & 2013)

  31. Rationale for Laboratory PFaCTS • At the facility level: • Measure capacity and progress toward accreditation • Gap analysis and development of laboratory specific improvement plan • At the program level: • Identify gaps in implementing QEs across supported labs • Prioritization and strategy development

  32. ICAP’s Laboratory Capacity Building Framework

  33. Objectives • To summarize findings from Lab PFaCTS 2013 • To compare laboratory capacity between years and by key characteristics

  34. Outline • Rationale & Objectives • General findings • Capacity score • Summary& Implications

  35. PEPFAR Definition of Clinical Laboratory

  36. Laboratories completing PFaCTS 2013

  37. ICAP SUPPORTED LABORATORIES BY FACILITY TYPE AND COUNTRY

  38. TYPE OF SUPPORT PROVIDED BY ICAP

More Related