1 / 38

National Agriculture Imagery Program Potential Program Changes

This document discusses potential improvements for the National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) in 2007, including evaluation methods, vendor feedback, and program changes. Topics covered include product deliverables, coverage, delivery cycle, improved horizontal accuracy, image quality improvement, and status information.

nicolefleming
Download Presentation

National Agriculture Imagery Program Potential Program Changes

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. National Agriculture Imagery ProgramPotential Program Changes USDA Planning Meeting Salt Lake City, Utah December 4-6, 2006 Kent Williams NAIP Program Manager USDA Farm Service Agency Aerial Photography Field Office (APFO)

  2. NAIP ProgramAgenda Potential Program Improvements for 2007 • Evaluation • In terms of management • Vendor feedback, RFI and Vendor site visits • 2007 Contract plans

  3. NAIP ProgramEvaluating Potential Changes 1) User and stakeholder feedback • QA results • Direct feedback • FSA user survey 2) Vendor Feedback • Vendor Site Visits 3) Capture Issues • Internal (APFO) • Contracting, Data management, Delivery, QA, etc. • Partners (NDOP Steering Committee meeting, USDA Planning Meeting) • FSA customers and stakeholders 4) Request for Information 5) Define 2007 Specifications 6) Request for Proposal

  4. Potential Changes in NAIP Program 1. Product Deliverables 2. Coverage 3. 1 meter only 4. Delivery Cycle 5. Improved Horizontal Accuracy 6. Image Quality Improvement 7. Status Information

  5. Product Deliverables

  6. Product Deliverables

  7. Coverage

  8. Coverage

  9. NAIP Coverage 11,191 QQs FSA Core Coverage 4410 QQs

  10. NAIP Coverage 2,155 QQs FSA Core Coverage 4,410 QQs

  11. 1 Meter Only

  12. 1 Meter Only

  13. Delivery Cycle

  14. Delivery Cycle

  15. May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar April May NAIP Annual Delivery Cycle 2006 Image Acquisition Quality Assurance Compressed County Mosaic APFO “spinning disk”

  16. May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar April May NAIP Annual Delivery Cycle 2006 Image Acquisition Quality Assurance Compressed County Mosaic Partners USDA Geospatial Data Gateway

  17. May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar April May NAIP Annual Delivery Cycle 2006 Image Acquisition Quality Assurance Quarter Quads APFO “spinning disk”

  18. May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar April May NAIP Annual Delivery Cycle 2006 Image Acquisition Quality Assurance Partners Quarter Quads

  19. May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar April May NAIP Annual Delivery Cycle 2006 Image Acquisition Quality Assurance Quarter Quads APFO Ordering System

  20. May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar April May NAIP Annual Delivery Cycle 2006 Image Acquisition Quality Assurance Quarter Quads ArcIMS Web Service

  21. May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar April May NAIP Annual Delivery Cycle Proposed 2007 Image Acquisition Quality Assurance Compressed County Mosaic APFO “spinning disk”

  22. May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar April May NAIP Annual Delivery Cycle Proposed 2007 Image Acquisition Quality Assurance Partners USDA Geospatial Data Gateway

  23. May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar April May NAIP Annual Delivery Cycle Proposed 2007 Image Acquisition Quality Assurance Quarter Quads APFO Ordering System

  24. May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar April May NAIP Annual Delivery Cycle Proposed 2007 Image Acquisition Quality Assurance Quarter Quads ArcIMS Web Service

  25. May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar April May NAIP Annual Delivery Cycle Proposed 2007 Image Acquisition Quality Assurance Partners Quarter Quads

  26. Improved Horizontal Accuracy Specifications

  27. FSA Requirement: Increase/Maintain Credibility with Customer (Producers)

  28. FSA Requirement: Increase/Maintain Credibility with Customer (Producers)

  29. FSA Requirement: Increase/Maintain Credibility with Customer (Producers) “The staff here has noticed that several Boundaries on several farms are off. Most are right on but they believe that many are off and they weren't off last year. We can correct the line work as we find them but I don’t want to. It changes acres and cropland and is not good business”

  30. FSA Requirement: Increase/Maintain Credibility with Customer (Producers)

  31. FSA Requirement: Increase/Maintain Credibility with Customer (Producers)

  32. Improved Horizontal Accuracy Specifications

  33. Image Quality

  34. Image Quality

  35. Status Information

  36. Status Information

More Related