- 170 Views
- Uploaded on
- Presentation posted in: General

Stress-Testing - Better Portfolio Mgmt

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Stress-Testing - Better Portfolio Mgmt

Steven P. Greiner, Ph.D.

Director of Risk, FactSet Research Systems

- Why do Stress-Testing? Governance, that’s why!!
- Extreme-Event Stress-Testing
- Going Non-Linear: Markov-Chain MC
- Conclusions

PRESENTATION FROM FACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS

- We are painfully aware of the public opinion towards the financial sector in the wake of continued financial crisis

Extreme Event

Stress-Testing

Practical Example

All data and charts sourced from FactSet Research Systems Inc.

EXTREME EVENT

1) Begins with a risk model, you need some way of estimating correlations (covariance) across assets

2) Obtain the covariance (or factor returns) from some historical “stressed” market environment or your own innovation

3) Use this covariance to compute risks &/or these factor returns to compute returns on today’s portfolio

Risk = <w*E*C*Et*wt> + <w*V(ε)*wt>

Is this risk level change caused by trades (w), exposure changes (E), or market volatility (systemic risk) itself (C)?

- 11/17
- 21/24
- 31/31
- 42/7
- 52/14
- 62/21
- 72/26

- Select several sequential weekly time periods
- Compute 95% VaR using all the combinations of actual portfolios, frozen portfolios (i.e. exposures) & covariance on those dates
- Choose 7 weeks: one obtains a 7 X 7 matrix of exposure changes on one axis & covariance changes on the other

All data and charts sourced from FactSet Research Systems Inc.

- When exposures are fixed & covariance evolves, one observes impact of changing correlations
- Covariance follows VIX
- Allows observation of volatility impact

All data and charts sourced from FactSet Research Systems Inc.

- When covariance is frozen & exposures change, one observes pricing impact
- prices detached from VIX
- Implies exposure change causes increase in risk

All data and charts sourced from FactSet Research Systems Inc.

- Move further out to 99% Value-at-Risk
- Even stronger affect out in the tail
- Exposures dominating

All data and charts sourced from FactSet Research Systems Inc.

- Monitor difference between 99% and 95% VaR
- Observe tail widening over time
- Though VIX muted..??
- Exposures increasing risk though volatility is stable

All data and charts sourced from FactSet Research Systems Inc.

- Current 95% VaRis increasing mildly =>
- Covariance isn’t resulting in the increased risk =>
- VIX volatility signals are subdued =>
- Rising tail risks are due to exposures changes (spreading of difference between 99% & 95% VaR) => Implies increasing probability of event risk
Q for PM’s: WOULD YOU DO ANYTHING?

All data and charts sourced from FactSet Research Systems Inc.

Markov Chain-MC

Stress-Testing

Practical Example

Drawback? Correlations tie directly

to linear stress-testing

All data and charts sourced from FactSet Research Systems Inc.

MARKOV-CHAIN MONTE-CARLO

1) Begins with a risk model, you need some way of estimating correlations across assets. Use when your subject to data starvation for tail estimates

2) Generate synthesized data that matches joint probability distribution between the stress & all risk model factors...simultaneously...to populate the tail

3) Calculate the “beta(s)” between stress & risk model factors:

Factor = beta1*stress + beta2*stress2 + others

4) For a given stress (i.e. -30%), compute a value of F given the applied stress & compute return estimate

- Generates sequence of random variables from an “unknown” multi-variate probability density while incorporating the correlations from each variable with every other
- Sequential values tend to be auto-correlated, so delete early trials
- Optimize the search width parameter to achieve ~25% acceptance ratio
- Especially useful for re-populating “tail” density
- However, it requires “trial” density???

Multivariate Weibull Distributions for Asset Returns: IYannick Malevergne & Didier Sornette; Finance Letters, 2004 2(6), 16-32

Empirical Pairs Plots (500x5)

MCMC Replicates (2500x5)

QA: Run Kolmogorov-Smirnov 2-sample test that measures whether “x” and “y” are drawn from same distribution

Empirical Scatter Plot

MCMC Reproduction

Kolmogorov-Smirnov

p-value is typically order of ~65%

Stress-Testing is good “Governance”

- Should be part of the investment process and requires cooperation between RM & PM
- Use it to complement traditional risk measures and to deploy your own insights
- Shouldn’t solely be based on naive inputs alone. Let your inner “Michelangelo” out, and be creative with it
FactSet offers complete system..