1 / 15

Approach to Sustainable Peace, Livelihood and Social Protection

Approach to Sustainable Peace, Livelihood and Social Protection.

nicki
Download Presentation

Approach to Sustainable Peace, Livelihood and Social Protection

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Approach to Sustainable Peace, Livelihood and Social Protection

  2. I would like to extend The Government of Sudan’s gratitude to the Donors community for the continuous support for peace , humanitarian assistance and Development , we are looking forward for more assistance as we are now moving from relief to repatriation and rehabilitation and development • From the past experience we have encountered many short falls and impediments in the areas of • Return • Mine Action • DDR • These shortfalls are many attributable to lack of effective Reintegration Programs of basic services at the reception areas,

  3. RETURN • The preparation for the return of IDPs in effect had started before the signature of CPA ( The Policy Frame Work Agreement July 2002) • The Government of Sudan , Government of Southern Sudan ,UN , Donors and International NGOs agreed to join the efforts for return , consequently the following mechanisms were established • Policy Committee • Technical Committee • Task Force

  4. RETURN • The Organized Return started early 2005 as a joint activity between The Government and UN and other Partners • The Return of IDPs was based on two Surveys in 2005 and 2006 to identify the wish for voluntary return among IDPs , the surveys indicated the following findings: 70% wished to return 20% wished to stay at the hosting communities 10% did not make a decision

  5. RETURN • Donors The Number of Returnees ( Organized and Spontaneous) during the period 2005 2007 was as follows • Spontaneous Return 1,400,000 • Organized Return ,300,000 • Refugees from neighbouring Countries ,200,000 • Total No. of Returnees Countries 1,900,000

  6. OPPORTUNITIES • The return was a good reflection of the successful implementation of the CPA , as the CPA was considered to be the corner stone reference for the right to return • The joint efforts of the different partners resulted in a successful model of cooperation efficiently utilizing the available resources • The International Community witnessed and appreciated the implementation of the CPA through this exercise

  7. CHALLENGES • Lack of basic services at the final destination • Short Dry Season ( 4 Months ) hampered the transport of IDPs and Refugees , coupled with the poor conditions of existing roads • The foregoing analysis indicate that for the return to take place effectively it will be very crucial to tackle the following major issues • Mine Actions • Provision of Basic Services, Humanitarian Intervention(early recover and livelihood ) at the final destination • Reintegration Programs at the host communities • Transport and Logistic facilities

  8. Return’s Progress Report (2005-2007)

  9. Return and RepatriationProgramme Planned Activities (2008-2011)

  10. Mine Action • Mine actions are considered to be as very crucial for return , as it paves the way for returnees to resume their normal life , as well as encouraging economic and social development through free movements of population , goods and services and most importantly giving support for mines victims

  11. Mine Action

  12. Mine Action

  13. PLANNED ACTIVITIES 2008-2011

  14. PLANNED ACTIVITIES 2008-2011

  15. Remarks • In conclusion this cluster had never been financed through MDTF . • The Return programs for IDPs are financed through CHF , in addition to the financial contributions of GNU and GOSS • In the forth coming Consortium we hope for considerable contribution for this cluster as the donors priority at present is funding reintegration programs in the South and the three areas , hence the return operations will be left lacking the necessary funds

More Related