1 / 36

Didactic Series

Didactic Series. Screening for Alcohol and Substance Abuse in HIV-infected Patients Chris Mathews, M.D., MSPH UCSD Owen Clinic Pacific AETC June 12, 2014. Learning Objectives. Review prevalence of substance use and substance use disorders (SUDs) in HIV-infected patients under care

neviah
Download Presentation

Didactic Series

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Didactic Series Screening for Alcohol and Substance Abuse in HIV-infected Patients Chris Mathews, M.D., MSPH UCSD Owen Clinic Pacific AETC June 12, 2014

  2. Learning Objectives • Review prevalence of substance use and substance use disorders (SUDs) in HIV-infected patients under care • Review impact of active substance use and SUDs on HIV-related health outcomes • Summarize the rationale for & limitations of substance abuse screening tools in HIV-infected patients • Describe available screening tools, how to get them and how to use them

  3. Self-Reported Substance Abuse Prevalence at Owen Clinic Entry (n=1,682)

  4. Poll Question 1 • How often you use any self report substance use screening tools on new HIV patients in your practice? • Always • Most of the time • Sometimes • Rarely • Never

  5. Poll Question 2 • When should urine drug screening be performed on HIV patients in your practice? (select as many as apply) • Routinely on all new patients • Routinely on all patients prescribed opiates • Only when abuse or diversion is suspected • As part of a work-up for altered mental status

  6. Consequences of Unrecognized and Untreated Substance Use Disorders (SUDs) for HIV Care • Poorer engagement in care • Less likely to be prescribed antiretroviral therapy • Worse adherence • More likely to be treated at advanced stages of HIV disease • More rapid disease progression • More likely to have worse treatment outcomes • Risk behavior disinhibition Chitsaz et al. AIDS Behav (2013) 17:S118–S127

  7. Conceptual Model of HIV-related Health Behaviors Chitsaz et al. AIDS Behav (2013) 17:S118–S127

  8. Consequences of Unrecognized and Untreated Substance Use Disorders (SUDs) for HIV Care Chitsaz et al. AIDS Behav (2013) 17:S118–S127

  9. Consequences of Unrecognized and Untreated Substance Use Disorders (SUDs) for HIV Care • Drug use severity was negatively and independently correlated with three outcomes just before incarceration: • having an HIV care provider AOR = 0.28 (2) being prescribed antiretroviral therapy AOR = 0.12 (3) high levels (> 95 %) of antiretroviral medication adherence AOR = 0.18 Chitsaz et al. AIDS Behav (2013) 17:S118–S127

  10. Consequences of Recent Substance Use for ART Adherence Rosen et al. AIDS Behav. 2013 Jan;17(1):142-7

  11. Consequences of Recent Substance Use for ART Adherence (ACTG 362) Cohn et al. AIDS Care. 2011 Jun;23(6):775-85

  12. Consequences of Recent Substance Use for Mortality(ACTG 362) Cohn et al. AIDS Care. 2011 Jun;23(6):775-85

  13. ASAM Definition of Addiction • Addiction is a primary, chronic disease of brain reward, motivation, memory and related circuitry. Dysfunction in these circuits leads to characteristic biological, psychological, social, and spiritual manifestations. • This revised definition of addiction is characterized by: • Inability to consistently abstain • Impairment in behavioral control • Craving • Diminished recognition of significant problems with one’s behaviors and interpersonal relationships • A dysfunctional emotional response http://www.asam.org/research-treatment/definition-of-addiction

  14. Substance Use Disorders and DSM-5 • The term addiction is not applied in DSM-5 • The more neutral term of substance use disorder (SUD)used to describe a wide range of disorder, from mild to severe, chronically relapsing, compulsive drug taking • SUD includes the previous DSM-4 categories of substance abuse and substance dependence • 2 defined criteria necessary for SUD diagnosis (DSM-4 required only 1) • Distinction made between SUD and substance-induced disorders (intoxication and withdrawal)

  15. The Screening Process • Is defined as a range of evaluation procedures and techniques • Does not enable treatment personnel to make a clinical diagnosis • Indicates whether a probability exists that the condition sought is present • Is a preliminary assessment to determine whether key features of a targeted problem are present in an individual. • Limitations of self-report associated with stigma SAMHSA TIP 11

  16. The Screening Process • A comprehensive assessment is a thorough evaluation to establish the presence or absence of a disorder or disease. • Once screening results are known, one of the following three conclusions can be drawn: • The individual is likely to benefit from referral for a comprehensive assessment. • Further assessment is unwarranted. • Screening should be repeated at a later time. SAMHSA TIP 11

  17. Screening tools: Options to Consider • Single item vs. multi-item • Alcohol, other substances, or combined • Self-administered vs. interviewer administered vs. computer-assisted

  18. Substance Screening Tools: Examples Alcohol Screening Combined substance screening DAST NIDA-ASSIST CRAFFT (for adolescents) CAGE-AID Single question screener for drug abuse • CAGE • MAST • AUDIT • Maximum drinks screener • Frequency of 5+/4+ drinking screener

  19. SBIRT Recommended Screening Tools: CAGE Agerwala et al. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2012 Sep-Oct;44(4):307-17

  20. SBIRT Recommended Screening Tools: CRAFFT Agerwala et al. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2012 Sep-Oct;44(4):307-17

  21. SBIRT Recommended Screening Tools: AUDIT Agerwala et al. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2012 Sep-Oct;44(4):307-17

  22. SBIRT Recommended Screening Tools: ASSIST Agerwala et al. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2012 Sep-Oct;44(4):307-17

  23. SBIRT Recommended Screening Tools: Single Item Tools Agerwala et al. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2012 Sep-Oct;44(4):307-17

  24. Screening Resources • SAMHSA screening tools URL • http://www.integration.samhsa.gov/clinical-practice/screening-tools#drugs • SAMHSA SBIRT (Screening, Brief Intervention, Referral, Treatment) • http://beta.samhsa.gov/sbirt • CRAFFT • http://www.ceasar-boston.org/CRAFFT/ • AUDIT • http://www.integration.samhsa.gov/AUDIT_screener_for_alcohol.pdf • DAST • http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/attachements.cfm/att_61480_EN_DAST%202008.pdf

  25. Screening Resources • AUDIT-C • http://www.integration.samhsa.gov/images/res/tool_auditc.pdf • CAGE-AID • http://www.integration.samhsa.gov/images/res/CAGEAID.pdf • NIDAMED (resources for health professionals) • http://www.drugabuse.gov/nidamed-medical-health-professionals • NIDA Drug Screening Tool (online) • http://www.drugabuse.gov/nmassist/

  26. http://www.drugabuse.gov/nmassist/ NIDA-ASSIST Online

  27. Poll Question 3 • How likely are you to implement in the next 3 months routine substance abuse screening using a standardized tool on new HIV patients? • Very likely • Somewhat likely • Possible • Unlikely • Very unlikely

  28. Poll Question 4 • How likely are you to implement in the next 3 months routine substance abuse screening using a standardized tool on follow-up HIV patients? • Very likely • Somewhat likely • Possible • Unlikely • Very unlikely

More Related