1 / 16

Wyoming Cooperative Model

Wyoming Cooperative Model. A Case Study 5 th Annual Farmer Cooperatives Conference November 15, 2002. The Wyoming Cooperative Model. Evolves cooperative structure into new forms Offers flexibility in structure Cooperatives may be organized similar to LLC

neveah
Download Presentation

Wyoming Cooperative Model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Wyoming Cooperative Model A Case Study 5th Annual Farmer Cooperatives Conference November 15, 2002

  2. The Wyoming Cooperative Model • Evolves cooperative structure into new forms • Offers flexibility in structure • Cooperatives may be organized similar to LLC • Opportunity for outside investment • Cooperative owners are it’s members • Patron Members • Investment Members • Patron members guaranteed 15% profit distribution • Wyoming model effective 7/1/01

  3. Cottage Grove Cooperative Core Divisions Feed Energy Grain Agronomy Supporting Divisions Hardware Stores Convenience Stores Truck Stop Heating & Cooling Transportation Services

  4. Union Cooperative Core Divisions Feed Energy Grain Agronomy Supporting Divisions Convenience Stores Tire Sales Transportation Services

  5. Reasons behind an Agronomy Joint Venture • Enhance profitability – greater ROI • Excel in customer service over a large trade territory • Efficient utilization of people and assets • Produce necessary critical mass • Increase purchasing power • Maximum advantage of dealer programs

  6. Events Leading to the Formation of Landmark • Our supplier, Agrilliance, owned four facilities near our trade territory • Union Cooperative handled the accounting for Agrilliance for a fee • Cottage Grove and Union had earlier developed a joint venture in Precision Agriculture • Agrilliance and both boards met to plan the future • Business service manager employed to lead feasibility study of combining nine agronomy locations

  7. Landmark Continued • Attorney hired to create joint venture agreement • Wyoming model selected for business structure • Name selection committee appointed • Landmark Services Cooperative organized in October 2001

  8. Landmark Startup Cost • 50% investment by Union and Cottage Grove • Landmark is approved for $12 million dollar seasonal line of credit • Computer related expenses exceeded $100,000 • Attorney fees - $50,000 • Consulting fees $5,000 • Selection of name and logos - $2500 • Identification of vehicles and facilities • Search of General Manager

  9. Operating Landmark • New equipment is purchased by Landmark • Present facilities and equipment are leased to Landmark • Employees are Leased to Landmark • Cottage Grove administers human resource programs • Landmark profit stream 60%CG and 40% Union • Union can increase investment to 50% profit dist • CG and Union each distribute patronage to growers

  10. Landmark Governance Structure Board of Directors Union Director Union CEO Union Controller CG Director CG CEO CG Controller Landmark GM Hub Managers Evansville Cottage Grove Juda Edgerton Employees Employees Employees Employees

  11. Computer Systems • User Group Selected SSI Software • Initial learning curve • Challenge to setup customers, products, tonnage taxes, etc. • Evaluated and upgraded hardware at all locations • Connected all locations with wide area network

  12. Accounting Systems • Blended Cultures between the agronomy locations • Adoption of 5% cash discount program • Changed statement due date to the 20th of each month • Development of fall deferred billing program • Employees initially resistant to changes • Development of newsletter to communicate policies

  13. Development of Future joint Ventures • Wyoming model is favorable for many applications • Each player should have reasonable profit expectations • Communications to customers and employees should be given high priority • Bringing philosophies & business practices together is a major challenge

  14. Continued • Startup costs generally will be higher than budgeted • Eliminating employee positions may not be as high as anticipated • Plan for tighter margins • Forming Landmark Agronomy Services firmly positions our cooperative for future success

More Related