1 / 19

The NCAR/ATEC Real-Time Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation and Forecast System (RTFDDA)

The NCAR/ATEC Real-Time Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation and Forecast System (RTFDDA) Yubao Liu, Laurie Carson, Francois Vandenberghe Chris Davis, Mei Xu, Rong Sheu, Al Bourgeios, Fei Chen and Daran Rife Project Leaders: Scott Swerdlin and Tom Warner. Problems, solutions and goals

natan
Download Presentation

The NCAR/ATEC Real-Time Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation and Forecast System (RTFDDA)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The NCAR/ATEC Real-Time Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation and Forecast System (RTFDDA) Yubao Liu, Laurie Carson, Francois Vandenberghe Chris Davis, Mei Xu, Rong Sheu, Al Bourgeios, Fei Chen and Daran Rife Project Leaders: Scott Swerdlin and Tom Warner • Problems, solutions and goals • Scientific design • Engineering aspects • Hardcoreissues: experience • On-going developments

  2. Issues for Mesoscale Analysis and Forecast • Local circulations are complicated • Large-scale forcing and multiscale interaction • Local terrain forcing • Contrasts in surface heating/cooling • Land-soil moisture and thermal properties • Data are sparse and irregular in space and time and they are not sufficient to describe the structures of local-scale circulations. • A full-physics mesoscale model with accurate local forcing + use of all data.

  3. NCAR/ATEC RTFDDA Is Such a System • PSU/NCARMM5 (version 3.6) based, • Real-time and Relocatable, • Multi-scale: meso-g meso-a (dx = 0.5 – 45 km), • Rapid-Cycling: at a flexible interval of 1 – 12 hours, • FDDA:4-D continuous data assimilation, and • Forecast( 0 – 48 hours) systems. Main Objective: effectively combines the full-physics MM5 model with all available observations to produce best-possible real-time local-scale analyses and 0 – 48 hour forecasts

  4. Observations (synoptic/asynoptic) Cold Start t FDDA (MM5) (once a week) Forecasts (MM5/WRF) Data Assimilation and Forecasting FDDA is based on “Observation-Nudging” Technique • Stauffer and Seaman (1995), and • Numerous modifications and refinements by NCAR/ATEC modelers. ( See ~20 pubs at https://4dwx.org/publications/ )

  5. Obs-nudging: Weighting Functions W = WqfWhorizontal WverticalWtime

  6. OBS OBS Hi sfc Obs-nudging: Weighting Functions W = WqfWhorizontal WverticalWtime Weighting functions should depend on grid sizes; local terrain; observation location, time, quality, platforms; and air stream properties.

  7. Advantages of Continuous OBS-Nudging • Allows for model-defined solution in data-sparse regions, but adjusts for observations where they exist. • Combines the dynamic balance and physical forcing of a model, with observation information available at and before forecast time. • Provide 4-D, continuous, “spun-up” and complete analyses and I.C. for nowcasts/forecasts: • Local circulations and cloud and precipitation fields • Note: “Analysis Nudging” technique may not be applicable in meso- b and g scale models

  8. Oct.10,00 June.1,02 Feb.5,02 Jul.2,01 Afghanistan Iraq Sep.4,01 Athens-2004 Operational RTFDDA Systems 5 permanent + 8 short-term systems Regular Operational RTFDDA Systems Special-operation Sites

  9. RTFDDA Engineering Design • MACs and DACs • MACs: 16 – 48-node linux clusters • 1 - 3 GHz dual-CPUs with Myrinet networking • Parallel data collection, data assimilation and post-processing • Graphics and file service of various formats • Archiving, verification and local-scale climotologies • Tools for system monitoring and recovery

  10. Grid 1: 36km Grid 2: 12km Grid 3: 4.0km Grid 4: 1.33 km (130 km x 85 km) Domain Configuration Example 2002 SLC Olympics

  11. Diverse and Frequent Observations(An example)

  12. Soundings (1665) Profilers (3717) obs ACARS (4220) SATWINDs (2323) BIAS = 0.6 RMSE=3.1 BIAS = 1.1 RMSE=3.3 BIAS = 0.5 RMSE=2.1 BIAS = 1.1 RMSE=4.1 model U (m/s)Modelvs Observation (750–300hPa) Valid at 00 UTC of the 5-day simulation

  13. More data; No bad data; Use of data quality Dealing with the model errors – physics bias Fine-tuning data assimilation weighting function Considering small-scale uncertainties RT-FDDA Model System METAR, spec, buoy, ship, temp, pilot, speci, Mesowest, Satellite winds, ACARS, NPN profilers, CAP profilers, radar data, range SAMS, soundings and profilers, cloud / precipitation, and … Model physics Data assimilation schemes SST, snow cover/depth, sea ice LSM DA for soil properties Analyses QC RTFDDA Forecasts GPS Sat Tb … RUC ETA.. GMOD  GUI Ensemble  Anal/Fcst WRF FDDA

  14. GMOD (Global Meteorology on Demand)

  15. Summary • The goal of the RTFDDA system is to produce local-scale four-dimensional analyses and forecasts for various weather-critical applications, tests and events. • The RTFDDA system has proven to be reliable, reasonably accurate, and widely applicable. • The operational RTFDDA systems have become a dependable tool for our users. • Continuous enhancements are being made to improve each system component, including data handling, data assimilation schemes, model physics…

  16. Weather Systems for Regional NWP Encompass several meteorological scales: • Synoptic ~ 1000 km • High/low pressure systems, fronts, cyclones … • Need 20 – 30-km grids • Mesoscale phenomena ~ 5 – 100 km • Mountain/valley circulations, sea breezes, convective systems, urban effects … • Need 0.5 – 10-km grids

  17. The end. Thank you!

  18. Scientific Issues for mesoscale prediction • Predictability-limits favor shorter forecasts • Strong dependence on initial conditions (IC) • “Spin-up” of dynamics and cloud/precipitation • Sparse and uneven observations • Dependency on larger scale models through boundary conditions (BC) • Model physics are extremely important

  19. Solution and Goals • Real-time observations • Collect as many observations as possible • Full use of the observations • Conduct dynamic and cloud/precipitation initialization • to eliminate/mitigate the “spin-up” problem, • Aim for best-possible “CURRENT” analyses and 0 – 12h forecasts, • Predictability is good, • Analysis/observations are effective, • Large scale model (B.C.) is accurate, • Fill the “Gaps” of the national operational center models. • and accurate 12 – 48 hour forecasts.

More Related