Detectors
Download
1 / 78

Detectors - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 203 Views
  • Updated On :

Detectors. 1. Accelerators 2. Particle detectors overview 3. Tracking detectors. Why do we accelerate particles ?. (1) To take existing objects apart 1803 J. Dalton’s indivisible atom

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Detectors' - nan


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Detectors l.jpg

Detectors

1. Accelerators

2. Particle detectors overview

3. Tracking detectors


Why do we accelerate particles l.jpg
Why do we accelerate particles ?

  • (1) To take existing objects apart

    • 1803 J. Dalton’s indivisible atom

      • atoms of one element can combine with atoms of other element to make compounds, e.g. water is made of oxygen and hydrogen (OH)

    • 1896 M. & P. Curie find atoms decay

    • 1897 J. J. Thomson discovers electron

    • 1906 E. Rutherford: gold foil experiment

  • Physicists break particles by shooting other particles on them


Why do we accelerate particles3 l.jpg
Why do we accelerate particles ?

  • (2) To create new particles

    • 1905 A. Einstein: energy is matter E=mc2

    • 1930 P. Dirac: math problem predicts antimatter

    • 1930 C. Anderson: discovers positron

    • 1935 H. Yukawa: nuclear forces (forces between protons and neutrons in nuclei) require pion

    • 1936 C. Anderson: discovers pion muon

  • First experiments used cosmic rays that are accelerated for us by the Universe

    • are still of interest as a source of extremely energetic particles not available in laboratories


Generating particles l.jpg
Generating particles

  • Before accelerating particles, one has to create them

    • electrons: cathode ray tube

      (think your TV)

    • protons: cathode ray tube

      filled with hydrogen

  • It’s more complicated for other particles (e.g. antiprotons), but the main principle remains the same


Basic accelerator physics l.jpg
Basic accelerator physics

  • Lorentz Force: F = qE + q(vB)

    • magnetic force: perpendicular to velocity, no acceleration (changes direction)

    • electric force: acceleration


Accelerators cockroft walton l.jpg
Accelerators: Cockroft-Walton

  • A (series of) voltage gap(s)

  • Maximum energy of a single gap is 200 kV, limited by discharge

  • CW accelerator at Fermilab: 750 kV


Accelerators van de graaf l.jpg
Accelerators: Van de Graaf

  • Van de Graaf generator: an electrostatic machine which uses a moving belt to accumulate very high voltages on a hollow metal globe

1: metallic sphere

2: electrode connected to 1

3: upper roller

4: belt (positive side)

5: belt (negative side)

6: lower roller

7: lower electrode (ground)

8: spherical device, used to discharge the main sphere

9: spark


Surfing the electromagnetic wave l.jpg
Surfing the electromagnetic wave

  • Charged particles ride the EM wave

    • create standing wave

    • use a radio frequency cavity

    • make particles arrive on time

  • Self-regulating:

    • slow particle  larger push

    • fast particle  small push



How to create a standing wave l.jpg
How to create a standing wave ?

  • Klystron (S. & R. Varian)

    • electrons flow into cavity, excite eigen modes

    • creates standing electromagnetic waves

  • A similar device (magnetron) found in your microwave oven

325 MHz Klystron for Proton Driver Linac (Fermilab)


Cyclotron l.jpg
Cyclotron

  • 1929 E.O. Lawrence

    • The physics: centripetal force mv2/r = Bqv

      • Particles follow a spiral in a constant magnetic field

      • A high frequency alternating voltage applied between D-electrodes causes acceleration as particles cross the gap

      • Advantages: compact design (compared to linear accelerators), continuous stream of particles

      • Limitations: synchronization lost as particle velocity approaches the speed of light

the world largest cyclotron

at TRIUMF (520 MeV protons)


Synchrotron l.jpg
Synchrotron

  • The idea: both magnetic field strength and electric field frequency are synchronized with the traveling particle beam

    • particle trajectories confined to a thin vacuum beamline  no large magnets, expandable

    • synchrotron radiation limits its use for electrons

  • Currently, accelerators of this type provide highest particle energies in the world


Summary on accelerator types l.jpg
Summary on accelerator types

  • Electrostatic accelerators

    • acceleration tube: breakdown at 200 keV

    • Cockroft-Walton: improves to 800 keV

  • AC driven accelerators

    • linear: cavity design and length critical

    • circular accelerators:

      • cyclotron: big magnet, non-relativistic

      • synchrotron: vacuum beamline, expandable, small magnets and cavities

      • synchrotron radiation large for light particles



Large electron positron collider l.jpg
Large Electron-Positron collider

  • Location: CERN (Geneva, Switzerland)

    • accelerated particles: electrons and positrons

    • beam energy: 45104 GeV, beam current: 8 mA

    • the ring radius: 4.5 km

    • years of operation: 19892000


Tevatron l.jpg
Tevatron

  • Location: Fermilab (Batavia, IL)

    • accelerated particles: protons and anti-protons

    • beam energy: 1 TeV, beam current: 1 mA

    • the ring radius: 1 km

    • in operation since 1983


Large hadron collider l.jpg
Large Hadron Collider

  • Location: CERN (Geneva, Switzerland)

    • accelerated particles: protons

    • beam energy: 7 TeV, beam current: 0.5 A

    • the ring radius: 4.5 km

    • scheduled start: 2007


Future of accelerators l.jpg
Future of accelerators

  • International Linear Collider: 0.53 TeV

    • awaiting directions from LHC findings

    • political decision of location

  • Very Large Hadron Collider (magnet development ?): 40200 TeV

  • Muon Collider (source ?) 0.54 TeV

    • lepton collider without synchrotron radiation

    • capable of producing many more Higgs particles compared to an e+e collider


Conclusions l.jpg
Conclusions

  • Motivation for particle acceleration

    • understand matter around us

    • create new particles

  • Particle accelerator types

    • electrostatic: limited energy

    • AC driven: linear or circular

  • Modern accelerators

    • TeVatron, LHC

    • accelerators to come: ILC, VLHC, muon collider…


Detectors20 l.jpg

Detectors

1. Accelerators

2. Particle detectors overview

3. Tracking detectors


Detectors and particle physics l.jpg
Detectors and particle physics

  • detectors allow one to detect particles 

    • experimentalists study their behavior

    • new particles are found by direct observation or by analyzing their decay products

    • theorists predict behavior of (new) particles

    • experimentalists design the particle detectors


Overview of particle detectors l.jpg
Overview of particle detectors

  • What do particle detectors measure ?

    • spatial location

      • trajectory in an EM field  momentum

      • distance between production and decay point  lifetime

    • energy

      • momentum + energy  mass

    • flight times

      • momentum/energy + flight time  mass


Natural particle detectors l.jpg
Natural particle detectors

  • A very common particle detector: the eye

    • detected particles: photons

    • sensitivity: high (single photons)

    • spatial resolution: decent

    • dynamic range: excellent (11014)

    • energy range: limited (visible light)

    • energy discrimination: good

    • speed: modest (~10 Hz, including processing)


Photographic paper l.jpg
Photographic paper

  • 1895 W. C. Röntgen: sensitivity to high energy photons (X-rays) invisible to the eye

    • working medium: emulsion

  • Properties:

    • detected particles: photons

    • sensitivity: good

    • spatial resolution: very good

    • dynamic range: good

    • no online recording

    • no speed resolution


The geiger counter l.jpg
The Geiger counter

  • 1908 H. Geiger

    • passing charge particles ionize the gas

    • ions (electrons) drift towards cathode (anode)

    • cause an electric pulse, can be heard in a speaker

  • Properties:

    • detected particles: charged particles (electrons, ,…)

    • sensitivity: single particles

    • spatial resolution: none (detector size) – can be fixed

    • dynamic range: none – can be fixed

    • speed: high (determined by charge drift velocity)


The cloud chamber l.jpg
The cloud chamber

  • 1911 C. T. R. Wilson (1927 Nobel Prize)

    • the first tracking detector (tracking=many spatial measurements per particle)

  • Principle of operation:

    • an air volume is saturated with water vapor

    • pressure lowered to generate super-saturated air

    • charge particles cause saturation of vapor into small droplets  can be observed as a “track”

    • photographs allow longer inspection


The cloud chamber27 l.jpg
The cloud chamber

  • Properties:

    • detected particles: charged particles (electrons, ,…)

    • sensitivity: single particles

    • spatial resolution: excellent

    • dynamic range: good

      • as particle slows down, droplets occur closer to each other

      • if placed inside a magnet, can observe curled trajectories

    • speed: limited (need time to recover the super-saturated state)


Photographic emulsions l.jpg
Photographic emulsions

  • Rarely used in modern experiments due to principal restrictions:

    • cannot be read out electronically

      • used to need a lot of technicians looking at photographs by eye – inefficient, boring, and error prone

      • today using pattern recognition software (think OCR)

    • cannot be used online

  • One advantage is excellent spatial resolution (<1 m)

  • Were used in the -neutrino discovery (DONUT, 2000)


Modern detector types l.jpg
Modern detector types

  • Tracking detectors

    • detect charged particles

    • principle of operation: ionization

    • two basic types: gas and solid

  • Scintillators

    • sensitive to single particles

    • very fast, useful for online applications

  • Calorimeters

    • measure particle energy

    • usually measure energy of a bunch of particles (“jet”)

    • modest spatial resolution

  • Particle identification systems

    • recognize electrons, charged pions, charged kaons, protons


Tracking detectors l.jpg
Tracking detectors

  • A charged track ionizes the gas

    • 10—40 primary ion-electron paris

    • multiplication 3—4 due to secondary ionization

    • typical amplifier noise 1000 e—

      • the initial signal is too weak to be effectively detected !

    • as electrons travel towards cathode, their velocity increases

      • electrons cause an avalanche of ionization (exponential increase)

  • The same principle (ionization + avalanche) works for solid state tracking detectors

    • dense medium  large ionization

    • more compact  put closer to the interaction point

    • very good spatial resolution


Calorimetry l.jpg
Calorimetry

  • The idea: measure energy by total absorption

    • also measure location

    • the method is destructive: particle is stopped

    • detector response proportional to particle energy

  • As particles traverse material, they interact producing a bunch of secondary particles (“shower”)

    • the shower particles undergo ionization (same principle as for tracking detectors)

  • It works for all particles: charged and neutral


Electromagnetic calorimeters l.jpg
Electromagnetic calorimeters

  • Electromagnetic showers occur due to

    • Bremsstrahlung: similar to synchrotron radiation, particles deflected by atomic EM fields

    • pair production: in the presence of atomic field, a photon can produce an electron-positron pair

    • excitation of electrons in atoms

  • Typical materials for EM calorimeters: large charge atoms, organic materials

    • important parameter: radiation length


Hadronic calorimeters l.jpg
Hadronic calorimeters

  • In addition to EM showers, hadrons (pions, protons, kaons) produce hadronic showers due to strong interaction with nuclei

  • Typical materials: dense, large atomic weight (uranium, lead)

    • important parameter: nuclear interaction length

  • In hadron shower, also creating non detectable particles (neutrinos, soft photons)

    • large fluctuation and limited energy resolution


Muon detection l.jpg
Muon detection

  • Muons are charged particles, so using tracking detectors to detect them

    • Calorimetry does not work – muons only leave small energy in the calorimeter (said to be “minimum ionization particles”)

    • Muons are detected outside calorimeters and additional shielding, where all other particles (except neutrinos) have already been stopped

    • As this is far away from the interaction point, use gas detectors


Detection of neutrinos l.jpg
Detection of neutrinos

  • In dedicated neutrino experiments, rely on their interaction with material

    • interaction probability extremely low  need huge volumes of working medium

  • In accelerator experiments, detecting neutrinos is impractical – rely on momentum conservation

    • electron colliders: all three momentum components are conserved

    • hadron colliders: the initial momentum component along the (anti)proton beam direction is unknown


Multipurpose detectors l.jpg
Multipurpose detectors

  • Today people usually combine several types of various detectors in a single apparatus

    • goal: provide measurement of a variety of particle characteristics (energy, momentum, flight time) for a variety of particle types (electrons, photons, pions, protons) in (almost) all possible directions

    • also include “triggering system” (fast recognition of interesting events) and “data acquisition” (collection and recording of selected measurements)

  • Confusingly enough, these setups are also called detectors (and groups of individual detecting elements of the same type are called “detector subsystems”)



D detector at fermilab l.jpg
D detector at Fermilab

  • D detector is one of two large multipurpose detectors at Fermilab (another one is CDF)

    • name = one of six intersection points


D fairly typical hep detector l.jpg
D: fairly typical HEP detector


D tracking system 1 l.jpg
D: tracking system (1)

  • Vertex detector: Silicon Microstrip Tracker

    • four layers of silicon detectors intercepted with twelve disks + (recent addition) Layer 0


D tracking system 2 l.jpg
D: tracking system (2)

  • Outer tracking detector: Central Fiber Tracker

    • sixteen double layers of scintillating fibers


D calorimeter l.jpg
D: calorimeter

  • Liquid argon / uranium calorimeter, consisting of central and two end calorimeters


D outer muon system l.jpg
D: outer muon system

  • The outermost part of the detector, surrounds the whole thing

    • Proportional Drift Tubes, Mini Drift Tubes

    • Central (Forward) muon SCintillators


D other elements l.jpg
D: other elements

  • Magnet: a central solenoid magnet (2 T) and outer toroid magnet

  • Luminosity scintillating counters

  • Central and forward preshower

  • Forward proton detector (Roman pots)

  • Data acquisition, trigger system, …


Conclusions45 l.jpg
Conclusions

  • Particle detectors follow simple principles

    • detectors interact with particles

    • most interactions are electromagnetic

    • imperfect by definition but have gotten pretty good

    • crucial to figure out which detector goes where

  • Three main ideas

    • track charged particles and then stop them

    • stop neutral particles

    • finally find the muons which are left


Detectors46 l.jpg

Detectors

1. Accelerators

2. Particle detectors overview

3. Tracking detectors


Gas detectors l.jpg
Gas detectors

  • As a charged particle crosses a gas volume, it creates ionization

    • electrons get kicked out of atoms

    • the rest of atom becomes electrically charged (ion)

  • In absence of external field, ions and electrons recombine back to neutral atoms

    • electrons drift to anode

    • ions drift to cathode

E = V/r ln(b/a)


Ionization l.jpg
Ionization

  • Affected by many factors

    • gas temperature

    • gas pressure

    • electric field

    • gas composition

  • Important parameters:

    • ionization potential

    • mean free path

  • Some gases eat up electrons (“quenchers”)


Ionization as a function of energy l.jpg
Ionization as a function of energy

  • Ionization probability gas dependant

  • General features:

    • threshold (~20 eV)

    • fast turn on

    • maximum (~100 eV)

    • soft decline

eV


Mean free path l.jpg
Mean free path

  • Average distance an electron travels before it hits an atom – determined by gas density

  • At ambient pressure (1013 hPa), air density is 2.71019 molecules/ccm, and mean free path is 68 m

  • At high vacuum (10—3…10—7 hPa), mean free path is 0.1…1000 m


What happens after ionization l.jpg
What happens after ionization ?

  • After collision, ions (electrons) thermalize and travel until neutralized through electron (ion), wall, negative ion (other molecule)

  • Mean free path for electrons ~4 times longer than for ions

  • Ions diffuse slowly, electrons diffuse quickly

  • Diffusion velocity depends on gas


Avalanche l.jpg
Avalanche

  • Steps of an avalanche:

    • a primary electron proceeds towards the anode, experiencing ionizing collisions

    • due to the lateral diffusion, a drop-like avalanche, surrounding the wire, develops

    • electrons are collected during ~1 ns

    • a cloud of positive ions slowly migrates towards the cathode


Ionization chamber l.jpg
Ionization chamber

  • Low voltage, no secondary ionization – just collect ions

    • example: smoke detector

      • radiation source (Am-241) emits -particles

      • they pass through ionization chamber, creating current

      • smoke absorbs -particles and interrupts current


Proportional counter l.jpg
Proportional counter

  • Higher voltage, tuned to provide proportional regime:

    • each avalanche is created independently from others  total amount of charge created remains proportional to the amount of charge liberated in the original event, which in turn is proportional to the particle’s kinetic energy


Spark chamber l.jpg
Spark chamber

  • Device similar to Geiger counter

  • Ionizing particles produce sparks along its way that can be photographed and used later for reconstruction of tracks

    • My diploma work was done on the ITEP’s 3m magnet spectrometer equipped with spark chambers




Multi wire proportional chamber l.jpg
Multi Wire Proportional Chamber

  • 1968 G. Charpak (1992 Noble Prize)

    • the idea: make a proportional counter with a lot of anodes placed between two cathode planes

    • by looking at which wires were fired, can determine position of the particle

    • if the proportional mode is used, can determine particle’s energy + improve position resolution (by interpolation)

    • drift chambers: measure time of arrival of the electron avalanche  improve position resolution + provide a timing reference point


Mwpc electric field l.jpg
MWPC electric field

  • Homogeneous field away from anode wires

  • Field near wires very sensitive to their position

from G. Charpak’s Noble lecture


Mwpc design l.jpg
MWPC design

  • Constraints

    • precise position measurements require precise and small wire spacing

    • homogeneous fields require small wire spacing

    • large fields require thin wires

    • geometric tolerances cause gain variations

  • Geometry and problems

    • required precision: sub millimeter

    • long chambers need strong wires (W/Au plated) and high tension to minimize sagging


Choice of gas l.jpg
Choice of gas

  • It’s a magic

    • low working voltage

    • high gain operation

    • good proportionality

    • high rate capability

    • long lifetime

    • fast recovery

    • price


Operation conditions l.jpg
Operation conditions

  • Pressure: slightly above atmospheric

    • avoid incoming gas “pollution”

    • a large tracker is not really air tight

    • not too high (difficult to maintain)

  • Temperature: slightly lower than room t.

    • avoid large temperature gradients

    • affected by environment (e.g. cooling of nearby systems)


Limitations of chambers l.jpg
Limitations of chambers

  • High occupancy: OK

    • used in Alice (heavy ion collisions at LHC)

  • Radiation hardness

    • tough but manageable (need gas flow)

  • Speed

    • is a problem for LHC applications (25 ns bunch crossing)

    • ion drift is limiting factor

    • can be addressed with special technologies (GEM)


Time projection chamber rhic l.jpg
Time Projection Chamber (RHIC)

  • Brookhaven Nat’l Lab, Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider

  • Shown: Gold-Gold collision


Solid state detectors l.jpg
Solid state detectors

  • Basic operation principle same as gas detectors


Silicon detectors l.jpg
Silicon detectors

  • Solid state tracking detectors: semiconductor diodes with reverse bias

    • normally there is no current (except very low “dark current”)

    • a charged particle creates a track of carriers (electron-hole pairs) along its way  charge pulse


Why silicon l.jpg
Why silicon ?

  • Low band gap width: 1.12 eV (large number of charge carriers / unit energy loss)

  • Energy to create an e/h pair: 3.6 eV (an order of magnitude smaller than ionization energy for gases)

    • high carrier yield

    • low Poisson noise

    • no gain stage required

      • better energy resolution and high signal


Why silicon cont d l.jpg
Why silicon ? (cont’d)

  • High density and atomic number

    • reduced range of secondary particles

    • can build thin detectors

      • better spatial resolution

  • High carrier mobility

    • typical charge collection times <30 ns

    • no slow component (ions)

  • Excellent mechanical rigidity

  • Industrial fabrication techniques

  • Detector and electronics can be integrated


Problems l.jpg
Problems

  • Cost

    • proportional to area covered

    • most of the cost is moving to read out channels

  • Material budget

    • for complex detectors can be as large as ~1—2 radiation lengths

    • affects calorimeters behind the detector

    • affects tracking accuracy (multiple scattering)

  • Typically need cooling to reduce leakage current (thermal energy = 1/40 eV)


Radiation hardness l.jpg
Radiation hardness

  • What is it ?

    • particles damage silicon crystal structure

    • band gap decreases

    • leakage currents increase

    • gain drops

      • detector looses efficiency and precision

  • What to do ?

    • exchange detectors

      • ATLAS: replace inner detector after 3 yrs of operation

    • switch to radiation hard technology (e.g. diamonds)


Diode strip detectors l.jpg
Diode strip detectors

  • Idea (1980’s): divide the large-area diode into many small strip-like regions and read them out separately

    • Typical strip pitch p = 20—few hundred m

    • Position measurement precision:

      • digital readout:  = p/12

      • analog readout:  = p/(S/N) (S = signal, N = noise)


Function l.jpg
-function

  • Let a particle pass the detector between two strips (i) and (i+1) at coordinate x = xi…xi+p

  • If strip (i) collects charge qi, and strip (i+1) collects charge qi+1, (x) = qi/(qi+qi+1)

    • ideally, (x) = 1, x<xi+p/2, and (x) = 0, x>xi+p/2

    • in practice, it’s not true:

      • finite charge cloud size (~5 m)

      • charge capacitance between strips

      • non-uniform electric field


Lorentz shift l.jpg
Lorentz shift

  • If a detector is placed in magnetic field (parallel to its strips), charge careers are deflected as they drift towards the strips

    • introduces systematic shift of the measured position

    • signal gets spread between several strips

      • increases cluster sharing (bad)

      • with analog readout, improves spatial resolution (good)


Double sided readout detectors l.jpg
Double sided readout detectors

  • Idea: use both types of carriers to make two position measurements for the same amount of material

    • Usually cross strips  2-dim measurement

    • From charge correlation can resolve ambiguities

n-side charge

p-side charge


Pixel detectors l.jpg
Pixel detectors

  • Provide 3-dim points with very high precision

    • main issue is readout

    • can read out individual pixels or entire rows/columns

  • Electrodes are close !

    • low full bias

    • low collection distance

    • no charge spreading

    • fast charge sweep out


Pixel vs strip detector operation l.jpg
Pixel vs strip detector operation

-ve

-ve

-ve

SiO2

+ve

+ve

-ve

p+

+

h

+

h

n

E

W2D

-

e

E

-

e

n+

W3D

+ve

strip detector

pixel detector



Conclusions78 l.jpg
Conclusions

  • Tracking detectors

    • detect charged particles

    • measure arrival time and charge deposition

    • derive 3 dimensional location and energy

  • Design

    • inner detectors: silicon (strip/pixel), highest track density resolution (tens of m)

    • outer detectors: gas detectors, lower resolution (hundreds of m)


ad