1 / 15

Definitions:

Adaptation to Climate Change Guidance to Programming Opportunities Energy and Environment Practice Meeting 27-28 September, 2005 Bratislava, Slovak Republic. Definitions:.

naida
Download Presentation

Definitions:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Adaptation to Climate ChangeGuidance to Programming OpportunitiesEnergy and Environment Practice Meeting27-28 September, 2005Bratislava, Slovak Republic

  2. Definitions: • Adaptation: adjustment…in response to actual climatic stimuli or their effects, which moderates harm or exploits beneficial opportunities • Adaptation is a process by which strategies to moderate, cope with, and take advantage of the consequences of climate events are enhanced, developed and implemented • Adaptive capacity is the ability of a system to adjust to climate change, including climate variability and extremes…. • Adaptive capacity is the property of a system to adjust its characteristics or behavior, in order to expand its coping range under existing climate variability, or future climate conditions

  3. Rationale and Objective Objective is “to address the adverse impacts of Climate change by building adaptive capacity, the capacity to assess vulnerability; to identify and implement suitable adaptation measures; to increase ecosystem resilience to the adverse impacts of climate change”. (GEF/R.4/Inf.7) • Coping with climate change impacts imposes additional cost on countries; • “additional cost” principle – cost of additional measures needed to increase the coping range and build adaptive capacity; • When additional cost incurred to deliver global environmental benefit it is viewed as the additional incremental cost

  4. GEF Adaptation Funds GEF manages 4 categories of adaptation funds: • GEF Trust Fund • Enabling Activities: Second National Communications • Strategic Priority on Adaptation (SPA) new! • Least Developed Country Fund (LDCF) – NAPAs for the 48 LDCs • Special Climate Change Fund (SCCF) new! • Adaptation Funds not yet operational – 2% of the share of the proceeds from CDM projects

  5. Strategic Priority on Adaptation SPA is to support demonstration projects that both address local adaptation needs and generate global environmental benefits in the GEF focal areas. Eligibility criteria: • All countries • Vulnerable ecosystems and protected areas; ICZM; risk management in land management planning; etc. • Be based on priorities identified by the NCs and Adaptation strategies; • Must deliver global environmental and development benefits • Be based on existing GEF criteria for M&E, country driveness, incremental reasoning, and co-financing Operational 1 July 2004 $75M ($30M GEF-3; $45M GEF-4)

  6. Strategic Priority on Adaptation UNDP 70%: World Bank 30% of GEF-3 funds programmed Many UNDP approved projects are agriculture and water-related: • Southern and East Africa: Coping with Drought (LD) • Kenya: Mainstreaming Climate Change & Adaptation into Integrated Water Resource Management (BD) • Hungary: Lake Balaton (BD) • West Africa: Responding to Shoreline Change (BD/IW) • Global: Community-based adaptation • GEF-4 programming paper states that the pilot will be reviewed before additional funds are allocated

  7. Special Climate Change Fund The SCCF supports projects in water, land management, agriculture, health, infrastructure development, fragile ecosystems, coastal zone management, disaster preparedness (prevention not mitigation). Unlike the LDCF, it focuses on longer-term strategic approach to coping with climate change (GEF/C.24/12). Eligibility criteria: • All countries • Mainstreaming into above sectors • Development (not global) benefits are required • Sliding scale funding for medium and full size projects • $1M – 50%; $1-5M -33%; $5-more -25% • Should not be lead by environment First Pipeline September 2005 Pledged $34M, additional pledges expected

  8. Least Developed Country Fund LDC are most vulnerable to climate change. The LDCF supports (a) preparation of National Adaptation Programmes of Actions (NAPA), for identifying urgent and immediate needs; (b) implementation of NAPA • Operational 2002 (NAPA); Fund most likely to grow: $62M ($30M GEF-3; $30M pledged) AF – the same as SCCF. AF will be financed from the share of proceeds on the CDM.

  9. UNDP-GEF Approach • The key approach of UNDP is to work from "current climate variability and hazards as the starting point for assessing national needs for coping with future climate change....to strengthen adaptive capacity to deal with current climate variability as a first step towards developing national response measures for future climate change".

  10. Additional Guidance to identify eligible project • Adaptation Polciy Frameworks that will provide a useful guidance for your project formulation. http://www.undp.org/cc/apf.htm • NCSAs, INCs, FNCs… NAPs, BSAPs, disaster management, drought preparedness, Sectorial strategies etc.

  11. Continued The basic Objectives of an adaptation project might be to: • Increase the robustness of infrastructure designs and long-term investments • Increase the flexibility and resilience of managed natural systems • Enhance the adaptive capacity of vulnerable groups • Reverse trends that increase vulnerability • Improve societal awareness and preparedness for future climate change • Integrate adaptation in national and sectoral planning

  12. Continued Where to look at in assessment for project formulation? The following elements and trends need to be assessed in order to make a comprehensive judgment: • Climate change trends and climate hazard trends (droughts, floods other climate calamities) based on current and future scenarios; • Environment and natural resource management trends (air pollution, land-use, deforestation, water logging etc) that exacerbates or mitigates climate impacts; • Socio-economic trends and risks (current economic development tendencies, impact on environment, current impact of climate variability and potential impact of climate change on socio-economic development); • Barriers to adaptive capacity building (legislation, rules, regulations, standards, integrated approaches, institutional measures, fiscal measures: taxes, insurance etc; awareness and expertise etc)

  13. Continued • Prioritization of key systems: • Human Vulnerability (sample system – smallholders); • Economic Vulnerability (sample system – water resources); • Physical Vulnerability (sample system – coastal region);

  14. Adaptation Learning Mechanism: Learning by doing • The project will maximise adaptation learning through implementation of projects under the GEF’s Strategic Priority on Adaptation (SPA), and will generate knowledge to help further guide implementation and improve impacts of GEF adaptation projects. • The objective of the project is to provide tools and establish a learning platform for mainstreaming adaptation to climate change within the development planning of GEF eligible countries. • The project proposes to: capture the current state of knowledge on planning, implementing and mainstreaming adaptation; identify key gaps in adaptation knowledge gaps; and develop responses to the knowledge gaps. An adaptation knowledge base will be designed, and operationalized though this project.

More Related