E N D
1. Maximizing Energy Savings in a Multiple Hearth Furnace By Nick Shirodkar
WSSC
2. Solids Handling Building at WB Furnace Stacks
3. HRAS ClarifierClarified effluent is considered secondary effluent
4. Heat Treatment Biosolids are heated to 380 degrees Fahrenheit for about 45 minutes, thus collapsing cell walls and releasing cell bound water.
5. High Speed Centrifuge
6. Incinerator Feed Pump
7. Hearth-3 a Burning Hearth
8. Hearth-5 Char Burning
9. Days/Fiscal Year of Dual Incineration
10. Western Branch Solids Currently undergoing Enhanced Nutrient Removal (ENR) upgrade
11. Current ImprovementsFGR, Heat Exchanger, CSJ, Venturi Scrubber
12. A 3-D Schematic of Furnace Improvements
13. Convection Concept in CSJ
14. Circle Slot Jet
15. Solids handling scheme at the WB Each MHF processes 13 dtpd at 24%
Current furnace upgrades will allow each MHF to process a minimum of 18 dtpd @24% (original capacity 25 dtpd @ 30%)
Each MHF requires 6 weeks down time for maintenance
Overall plan for 12 scheduled and 2 unscheduled = 14 wks
Solids processing beyond MHF capacity is needed
16. Four alternatives were considered following initial screening Electrodewatering (EDW) technology
Belt dryer technology to process excess solids beyond MHF capacity and reduce hauling quantities
Lime stabilization of excess solids to produce Class A or Class B biosolids for hauling and off-site disposal
Replace DAF with centrifugal thickening, upgrade MHF and use lime for excess solids
17. Solids Processing Scheme with Electrodewatering at WB
18. Principle of Elcotech, Canada
19. City of Valleyfield (Quebec) WWTP: 100% waste activated sludge
After BFP dewatering
CINETIK specifications:
Two (2) units, Model CINETIK-600
Capacity: 900 kg/hour per unit
Feed Sludge: 14%
Outlet Cake Dryness: 25%
Power consumption: average 100 kWh/Wet Ton
Solids Recovery Rate: higher than 99%
20. Two scenarios considered:
Scenario I: representing MHF normal operating conditions (target dryness from 24 % to 30 %)
Scenario II: representing truck hauling conditions when MHF is down (target dryness from 24 % to ~ 45 %)
EDW conceptual design parameters for WB
21. Objectives of the pilot scale testing Verify achieving desirable cake solids of 30-32% and 45-47% for the two scenarios
Determine the corresponding cake throughputs in DT/day with the two operating scenarios
Determine the electricity consumption in kw-h/DT with the anticipated two operating scenarios
Test performance with Electrodewatering Agent (EDA)
Measure the level of cake stabilization (fecal coliform colonies) in low throughput, high cake solids scenario when cake is expected to be hauled away
Measure the filtrate characteristics (at least once) in both scenarios in terms of TS, TKN, TSS, TDS
22. Cake sludge delivery to EDW unit
23. Filtrate outlet
24. Cake dryness with treatment time, NO EDA 32% goal was achieved with 5 min treatment time
33.5% during two-days trial using 7 min
Varying results can be due to inefficient sludge distribution in the headbox (not a problem with the full scale)
6 min treatment time can achieve the goal
25. Sizing linear EDA units A throughput of 11 dtpd of 25% inlet sludge may achieve final dryness of 30% at 4.8 minute treatment time,
Need EDA to achieve dryness beyond 40%
A throughput of 7 dtpd of 25% inlet sludge may achieve final dryness of 41% at 8.6 minute treatment time with EDA
26. Summary knowledge on EDW Achieve 35-50% cake solids from >10% input
Technology fills the technological and financial gap between mechanical dewatering and traditional thermal drying
Ideal for plants requiring upgrade in their dewatering system
Reduce volume by 50-65%
No polymer or chemical is needed - electricity consumption depends on solids type, throughput, and desired dryness
Achieve pathogen inactivation, can produce Class A (satisfy time, temperature relationship), need EPA approval
Cake has little odor, odor during process (collect and treat)