1 / 16

Development of Germanium Detector Simulations with the Geant 4 Toolkit

Development of Germanium Detector Simulations with the Geant 4 Toolkit. Andrew Mather arm@ns.ph.liv.ac.uk. 12th UK Postgraduate Nuclear Physics Summer School St. Andrews September 1st - 14th 2003. Presentation Overview. Geant 4 – Introduction Geant 4 – Simulation Structure

monet
Download Presentation

Development of Germanium Detector Simulations with the Geant 4 Toolkit

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Development of Germanium Detector Simulations with the Geant 4 Toolkit Andrew Mather arm@ns.ph.liv.ac.uk 12th UK Postgraduate Nuclear Physics Summer School St. Andrews September 1st - 14th 2003

  2. Presentation Overview • Geant 4 – Introduction • Geant 4 – Simulation Structure • Why use Simulations • HP Germanium Detectors Simulated • Results • Conclusion

  3. Geant 4 - Introduction • Developed at Cern by HEP. • Based on Object Orientated Architecture, Using C++ • Used in HEP, Nuclear, Medical and Accelerator Physics. • Fully open source, extremely flexible and extendable due to OO nature.

  4. Geant 4 – Simulation Structure

  5. Why use Simulations • Back-up (or otherwise!) experimental observations. • Ability to retrieve information not accessible from real detectors. (e.g. exact position and interaction type of gamma-ray interactions) • Can produce higher statistics for certain results. • Help decide properties that will yield best experimental results before commencing the experiment. • Cost and time saving, giving information that would not have been feasible to measure experimentally.

  6. HP Germanium Detectors Simulated Tigre GMX45PAS (All sizes in mm)

  7. Results – “GMX45PAS” * MCNP and Penelope results courtesy of Mark Ibison

  8. Results – “Tigre”

  9. Results – Multiplicity 122 Kev

  10. Results – Multiplicity 1408 Kev

  11. Results – Spectra Simulation Vs Exp

  12. Results – First Interaction

  13. Results – 511 Kev 1st 2nd 3rd interaction

  14. Results – Event ID

  15. Results – Doppler Broadening

  16. Conclusion • Simulations have produced resultsmostlyin agreement with experiment. • Produced some interesting results to be followed up experimentally in the future. (Tigre Hit-Patterns and Multiplicity data) • Greater understanding from retrieved data normally lost or hard to measure in experiments.

More Related