1 / 10

Projective geometry of 2-space

Projective geometry of 2-space. Primitives pt/line/conic HZ 2.2. Behaviour at infinity. Projective transform HZ 2.3. Hierarchy of maps Invariants HZ 2.4. DLT alg HZ 4.1. Rectification HZ 2.7. Computing a homography.

moke
Download Presentation

Projective geometry of 2-space

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Projective geometry of 2-space Primitives pt/line/conic HZ 2.2 Behaviour at infinity Projective transform HZ 2.3 Hierarchy of maps Invariants HZ 2.4 DLT alg HZ 4.1 Rectification HZ 2.7

  2. Computing a homography • given 2 images of a scene, we would like to compute the homography H that relates their pixels • excellent example of the system-of-equations approach to compute a matrix (the homography) as a null vector • H is a 3x3 matrix with 8 dof (9 – 1) • Hx = x’ • how will we solve for these 8 degrees of freedom? • solve for H using 4 point correspondences(x1,x1’), ..., (x4,x4’) • bootstrap from 4 matches to all matches • how will we find 4 point correspondences? SIFT (later) • can also rectify using these ideas (Fig 2.4) • HZ87-88, HZ35, Figure 4.9a,b

  3. Lessons of DLT • using SIFT for feature detection and feature matching • developing the linear system of equations appproach • learning to precondition data • learning how to solve least squares • we have learned how to solve for null space • learning RANSAC

  4. Cross product as matrix multiplication • we know that cross product may be interpreted as a determinant • it is even more useful to interpret it as a skew-symmetric matrix • a x b = [0 -a2 a1] [b0] [a2 0 -a0] [b1] [-a1 a0 0] [b2] • this is now a matrix multiplication and fits seamlessly into our algebraic schemes • we abbreviate this matrix [ax] so that a x b = [ax] b • cute: a is the null vector of [ax] (there’s no avoiding null space!) • mnemonic: lower triangle is a2,-a1,a0 • later we will interpret cross product as a tensor! • HZ581, Appendix A

  5. Reducing H to a null space • idea: use Hxi = xi’ to solve for H • Hxi = xi’ (which is not true in projective space; think scale) becomes xi’ x Hxi = 0 • let xi’ = (xi’, yi’, wi’), and use the skew-symmetric representation: • xi’ x Hxi = [0 - wi’ yi’] [h1txi] [wi’ 0 -xi’] [h2txi] [-yi’ xi’ 0] [h3txi] OR • [0 -wi’ yi’] [xit h1] [wi’ 0 -xi’] [xit h2] = 0 [-yi’ xi’ 0] [xit h3] OR • [0 -wi’xit yi’xit] [h1] [wi’xit 0 -xi’xit] [h2] = 0 [h3] OR (having removed the 3rd equation, since it is linearly dependent on the others) • Aih = 0 • where Ai is a 2x9 matrix and h is the row-major unrolling of H • this interprets H as the null vector of a 2x9 matrix

  6. Preamble to DLT algorithm • Note: xi’ * row1 + yi’ * row2 = -wi’ * row3 • DLT (Direct Linear Transformation) algorithm uses this transformation of point correspondences into a solution for the homography H • Aih = 0 encodes the restriction xi’ x Hxi = 0 (xi’ and Hxi are equivalent) • but now in the form of a linear system (no cross product, H isolated) • set the projective coordinate w = 1 in all of the points • collect 4 of these pt-correspondence matrices Ai, yielding an 8x9 matrix A, with a one-dimensional null space • solve Ah = 0 for null vector h using SVD (see above) • notice how this reverses the point of view: change the typical “solve Hxi = xi’ for xi“ into “solve Hxi = xi’ for H” • translate the matrix into a vector by unrolling • HZ88-89

  7. DLT algorithm • Find 4 point correspondences between 2 images of the same scene. • Precondition (see below). • Build the matrix Ai from each correspondence (xi , xi’). • Combine A1,...,A4 into A. • Find A’s null vector [see above: last column of V in SVD of A]. • This is the homography matrix H (encoded in row-major unrolling) that maps between the two images.

  8. Preconditioning • essential to normalize the images before applying DLT algorithm • let {(xi , xi’): i = 1,...,n} be the point correspondences • translate and scale both pointsets • translate centroid of {xi} to origin • scale new {xi} so that average {dist(xi , origin)} = sqrt(2) • motivation: typical point looks like (1,1) • do likewise to {xi’}, but entirely independently • translate centroid to origin and scale so avg dist from origin is \sqrt(2) • this normalization ensures that changes in x, y and w have comparable effect • e.g., if (100,100,1) is a feature point, changes in w will have 100 times more effect than changes in x or y • HZ107-109

  9. DLT with more than 4 correspondences • we can solve for the homography using only 4 point correspondences, but SIFT will typically find many more • if n>4 point correspondences are known, we can collect them into a 2n-by-9 matrix A • unless these correspondences are calculated exactly (highly unlikely!), Ah=0 will not be solvable • instead, minimize ||Ah|| subject to the constraint ||h||=1 • the constraint is added to avoid the zero solution • this optimal solution is the last column of V in the singular value decomposition A = UDV^t • serendipitously, same technique as original DLT algorithm • the vector h is reconstructed into H (see above) • that is, DLT algorithm remains exactly the same with 4 replaced by n • HZ90-91, 593

  10. Outliers and noise • it is better to use all of the computed correspondences, because some of them will be unreliable • cannot guess which 4 are reliable • can use RANSAC to determine the highly unreliable correspondences (the outliers) • then use all of the remaining (still noisy) correspondences • when data is noisy, better to use lots of data • Who wants to be a millionaire? studio audience poll

More Related