1 / 2

Multi-appliance solution:

Cisco Web Security Competitive Battlecard: Blue Coat Claims & Weaknesses. Blue Coat. Blue Coat Offerings. Blue Coat Claims. How-to-win Response. Multi-appliance solution:

mikasi
Download Presentation

Multi-appliance solution:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Cisco Web Security Competitive Battlecard: Blue Coat Claims & Weaknesses • Blue Coat • Blue Coat Offerings • Blue Coat Claims • How-to-win Response • Multi-appliance solution: • ProxySG: user authentication, web filtering, data loss prevention, inspection, visibility of SSL-encrypted traffic, content caching, bandwidth management, stream-splitting • + • ProxyAV: antimalware via ICAP; separate appliance • + • DLP: OEM from Code Green; separate appliance • + • Director: centralized policy management; requires hardware, licensing and support • + • Reporter: centralized reporting; off-box • Secure Web Gateway Virtual Appliance: capabilities of ProxySG for an enterprise branch office solution • WebFilter: powered by WebPulsethreat intelligence and includes ProxyClient, which needs another client manager • ThreatPulse: cloud service • Blue Coat Weaknesses • Complex, multi-box solution:every feature requires another box; Blue Coat historically puts PS on any order above $250k to account for inevitable trouble • Narrow threat intelligence: WebPulse serves only 1B requests a day (SIO = 13B) • Difficult management: UI is old and difficult to navigate; configuring even moderately complex policies is cumbersome and frustrating for new users; all boxes have different management structures, workflows and code trains • Limited AVC: most of their apps are domain based with no granular control • Increased latency: every AV scanner is a separate appliance in a chain, compounding latency • Migrating customers: support for ProxySG 210, 510, 810 and 8100 ends in 2013 • One-liners Multi-appliance solution is a pain to deploy and maintain Upfront value masks significant TCO due to complexity Blue Coat is a niche player with no broader security architecture Customers are often unhappy with support due to high churn

  2. Cisco Web Security Competitive Battlecard: Cisco Strengths and Defenses • Blue Coat Blue Coat on Cisco How-to-win Response Cisco vs. Blue Coat Overview Cisco Strengths • One-liners Cisco offers complete web security with a single appliance or cloud interface • Vision for security: 1 of Cisco’s top 5 priorities, with over $5B invested in R&D every year • Deployment flexibility: standalone, virtualized, cloud, router, firewall, hybrid, integrated mobility client • World-class support: JD Powers award winning security support centers worldwide • Investment protection: 3 to 5 years of support after end of life on both hardware and software • Threat Intelligence: SIO; 13B daily web requests • Simple deployment and maintenance: centralized management and reporting, with integrated services to reduce OpEx • Layered antimalware defense: multiple layers of malware built in, not added on Cisco has the market’s only 0-day anti-malware solution Cisco lowers TCO with simple deployment and management Cisco’s SIO offers real-time threat intelligence with the broadest visibility

More Related