1 / 39

Mobilizing PiT Count Results - Stephen Gaetz, Canadian Observatory on Homelessness

In this module, Professor Stephen Gaetz discusses the various uses of research in the context of Point-in-Time (PiT) counts. The module covers conceptual, instrumental, symbolic, and process uses of research, and explores how PiT count data can be analyzed, tracked, and used to support local planning, engage the public, and enhance understanding at a national level. The module also highlights the benefits of comparing results across communities and engaging higher levels of government to address homelessness.

mholder
Download Presentation

Mobilizing PiT Count Results - Stephen Gaetz, Canadian Observatory on Homelessness

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mobilizing PiT Count Results • Stephen Gaetz • Canadian Observatory on Homelessness • Professor, Faculty of Education, • York University, Toronto, Canada Point in Time Count Workshop • Module 7 – Mobilizing Results

  2. Part 1 The uses of RESEARCH

  3. Part 1 The uses of RESEARCH!

  4. Four Uses of Research • Conceptual • Instrumental • Symbolic • Process

  5. Conceptual research Contributes to the: “subtle but potentially weighty shifts in knowledge, understanding and discourse, can be hugely significant in policy and practice settings, not just as a means to more instrumental impacts from research but as an end in themselves.” (Sandra Nutley).

  6. Conceptual research

  7. Instrumentaluse of research • This refers to situations where research can be seen to have a direct and concrete impact on decision-making and actions by policy-makers and practitioners. • Typically focuses on existing policies and practices • Often involves program evaluation research that answers the questions: What works, for whom and in what contexts?

  8. Hierarchy of Evidence

  9. A good example . . .

  10. Symbolic use of research . . . involves using research results in the public realm to legitimate and sustain arguments, strategies and positions.

  11. Symbolic use of research

  12. Process use of research . . . engaging in the research process (through program evaluation, for instance), can lead to changes in ways of thinking, alter attitudes about the use of research and raise questions about the value of different kinds of knowledge and evidence.

  13. Uptake • Use • Impact ‘the ways in which research affects society are based on complex, iterative, self-reinforcing processes, distributed unequally across research initiatives ’ (Molas-Galart 2000 : 172).

  14. Research Evidence Matters!

  15. Part 2 Mobilizing PiT Count Data

  16. things you can do with data

  17. 1 Understanding the local context

  18. Data analysis

  19. Sub populations seniors Mapping the problem youth Indigenous people women Newcomers Key issues Level of Chronicity Service priorities of clients? Substance use Do services match subpopulations?

  20. 2 Tracking progress

  21. You’ve got to be careful, because if you don’t know where you are going, you might not get there.” Yogi Berra

  22. A count tells us how we are doing. • Your first count provides a baseline • Additional counts enable you to measure progress • Trends amongst sub-populations

  23. Are you trending upward or downward?

  24. Some communities are seeing real reductions in homelessness • Vancouver – 66% reduction in street homelessness since 2008 • Calgary – 11% reduction since 2008 • Edmonton – 30% reduction since 2008 • Lethbridge – 55% reduction since 2010

  25. 3 Support local planning

  26. Helps establish, measure & evaluate community priorities

  27. Do your systems and services adequately address the needs of the homeless population?

  28. 4 Engaging the Public

  29. Reporting out

  30. Dealing with the media

  31. Community engagement

  32. 5 Enhance understanding at a NATIONAL LEVEL

  33. Aggregating Data The more communities that participate, the more effectively we can tell the story of homelessness at a NATIONAL REGIONAL LOCAL level

  34. The benefits of Comparing Results

  35. Good data supports engagement with higher levels of government Federal, Provincial, Territorial and Indigenous Governments Community planning and programs

  36. Homelessness amongst Indigenous People in Canada Belanger, et al. 2012

  37. Engaging Provincial and Territorial governments

  38. Supporting a National Strategy

  39. Questions or comments?

More Related