1 / 8

2010 Work Plan

2010 Work Plan. Steering Committee January 29, 2010. Major Tasks. Benchmark Models Review Adequacy Methodology Assess Power Supply Adequacy Share Information Key Issues Key Decisions. Benchmark Models. Verify Data Resources (thermal, hydro, renewable, conservation, non-firm)

mbassler
Download Presentation

2010 Work Plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2010 Work Plan Steering Committee January 29, 2010

  2. Major Tasks • Benchmark Models • Review Adequacy Methodology • Assess Power Supply Adequacy • Share Information • Key Issues • Key Decisions

  3. Benchmark Models • Verify Data • Resources (thermal, hydro, renewable, conservation, non-firm) • Loads (annual, monthly, hourly) • Out-of-region Firm Contracts • Validate Models

  4. Review Adequacy Methodology(Proposed Contract with PSRI) • Survey use of probabilistic adequacy assessments in the US and in other countries • Develop options for the NW power supply (including status quo - LOLP as currently defined) • If appropriate, revise adequacy methodology • Translate probabilistic adequacy measure(s) into deterministic metrics with associated minimum thresholds

  5. Assess Power Supply Adequacy(Targeted to be Completed by June) • Update Resource and Load Data • Calculate Adequacy Measures • Annual Load/Resource Balance • January and July Sustained-Peak Reserve Margin • Check Measures against Thresholds 3 and 5 Years Out (2013 and 2015) • Take Appropriate Actions depending on Results

  6. Share Information • Publish annual adequacy assessment • Compare results with other regional reports • Work with regional utilities to incorporate adequacy assessments into their resource planning efforts • Work with WECC and NERC to ensure that NW adequacy is properly treated in West-wide or nation-wide assessments

  7. Key Issues • Develop synthetic temperature-correlated wind data • Define annual-energy and hourly-capacity wind factors • Identify reserve requirements (including within-hour) and how to treat them for adequacy assessments • Refine methods for assessing hydro sustained-peak capability • Reassess the definition for the sustained peak period • Explore how adequacy measures can be incorporated into long-term utility resource planning methods

  8. Key Decisions • Status of the Adequacy Forum • Level of utility guidance from the Forum • Definition and use of an “economic” adequacy measure

More Related