poznan 21 november 2002 dr ir matthijs soede senter eg liaison the netherlands m soede@egl nl
Download
Skip this Video
Download Presentation
Poznan - 21 November 2002 Dr. Ir. Matthijs Soede Senter/EG-Liaison The Netherlands

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 28

Poznan - 21 November 2002 Dr. Ir. Matthijs Soede Senter/EG-Liaison The Netherlands - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 210 Views
  • Uploaded on

“Practical Aspects of Preparation FP6 projects. Poznan - 21 November 2002 Dr. Ir. Matthijs Soede Senter/EG-Liaison The Netherlands [email protected] Content. From idea to the contract How to get into a consortium Evaluation Criteria Questions. From idea to the contract.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Poznan - 21 November 2002 Dr. Ir. Matthijs Soede Senter/EG-Liaison The Netherlands' - mateja


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
poznan 21 november 2002 dr ir matthijs soede senter eg liaison the netherlands m soede@egl nl

“Practical

Aspects

of

Preparation

FP6 projects

Poznan - 21 November 2002

Dr. Ir. Matthijs Soede

Senter/EG-Liaison The Netherlands

[email protected]

content
Content
  • From idea to the contract
  • How to get into a consortium
  • Evaluation Criteria
  • Questions
from idea to the contract1
From idea to the contract
  • Define your project - fit with FP6?
  • Read Workprogramme and Guide for proposers carefully
  • Draft first pages
  • Finding partners
  • Consortium Agreement
  • Writing proposal
  • Submitting proposal before the deadline
  • Evaluation of proposal
  • Contract negotiations
  • Contract
national regional contact point system
National/Regional Contact Point system
  • Giving information and advice about FP5/6
  • In every country - partners can ask for information in their own country!
  • Building bridges between Brussels and the research society
  • Giving support with finding partners
evaluation criteria1
Evaluation Criteria
  • Relevance to the objectives of the programme
  • Potential Impact
  • Scientific and Technological excellence
  • Quality of the consortium
  • Quality of the management
  • Mobilisaton of resources
size integrated project
Size Integrated Project

24 Million Euro for 4 years

20 Million Euro for personnel

1 researcher = 80000 Euro per year

20 Million Euro = 250 research years

Project 4 year: 62,5 researchers per year!!!!

relevance to the objectives of the programme
Relevance to the objectives of the programme
  • addressing the scientific, technical, socio-economic and policy objectives
    • Objective “Lisbon”:to allow the Union becomingthe most dynamic and most competitive knowledge-based economy within 10 years
    • Objective “Göteborg”:sustainable development (environment, economy, employment)
    • ERA:…Integrating, reinforcing, structuring
example topic from priority 3 nmp
Example topic from priority 3 NMP
    • Mastering chemistry and creating new processing pathways for multifunctional materials - IP; NE; STREP; CA
  • The overall objective is to maintain and extend Europe’s lead in chemical technologies, building on skills and respecting the environment, and also to provide benefits in other intermediary and end-user sectors. RTD objectives should include, among others, new strategies and optimisation of chemical reactivity and catalysis, development of supra-molecular and macromolecular engineering, product formulation, new solvent routes, chemistry and new synthesis routes for eco-materials
slide19

Innovation

Time

Integration is key in Priority 3 for...

Structuring ERA:

RTD organisations, Industry, Services, Users & funding sources

Strategic objectives:

leadership, cost-effectiveness, added value, sustainable growth, health & safety, cleaner environment, etc.

Complementary activities:

demos, education, training, information exchange with users, dissemination, legal & financial environment, IPR, etc

Research:

on enabling & hybrid technologies, i.e. design & engineering, clean technologies, materials science, social sciences, nanotechnology, etc

supporting changes in production

& consumption paradigms

potential impact
Potential Impact
  • Suitably ambitious in terms of its strategic impact on reinforcing competitiveness or on solving societal problems
  • Optimal use of the project results
  • Clear added value in carrying out the work at European level
scientific and technological excellence
Scientific and Technological excellence
  • Clearly defined objectives
  • the objective represent clear progress beyond the current state-of-the-art
  • The proposed S&T approach is likely to enable the project to achieve its objectives in research and innovation
quality of the consortium
Quality of the consortium
  • The participants collectively constitute a consortium of high quality
  • Participants well suited and committed to the tasks assigned to them
  • Good complementarity
  • Profiles of partners clearly described
  • Opportunity of involving SME’s has been adequately addressed
    • YOU NEED MOTIVATED PARTNERS
quality of the management
Quality of the management
  • The organisational structure is well-matched to the complexity of the project and to the degree of integration required
  • Project management is demonstrably of high quality
  • Satisfactory plan for the management of knowledge,of intellectual property and of other innovation related activities
management integrated projects

Ethical aspects, science-society dialogue

Training

strong management

structure

RTD 4

RTD 5

Management

RTD 1

RTD 3

RTD 2

Implementation

Plan

Demonstration

Technology transfer, exploitation

Management Integrated projects
  • Project coordination team
  • Scientific board
networks of excellence

Governing Council

Funding Bodies Representatives

 To structure the EU research potential

by integrating research capacities

European Commission

  • Joint research activities
  • Integrating activities
  • Spreading of excellence
  • Common management

Management Group

Management Group

Research team leader

Partner Organisation Representative

Networks of Excellence
mobilisation of resources
Mobilisation of resources
  • Consortium mobilises the critical mass of resources (personnel, equipment, finance….)
  • Resources are convincingly integrated to form a coherent project
  • The overall financing plan for the project is adequate.
ad