1 / 28

Poznan - 21 November 2002 Dr. Ir. Matthijs Soede Senter/EG-Liaison The Netherlands

“Practical Aspects of Preparation FP6 projects. Poznan - 21 November 2002 Dr. Ir. Matthijs Soede Senter/EG-Liaison The Netherlands m.soede@egl.nl. Content. From idea to the contract How to get into a consortium Evaluation Criteria Questions. From idea to the contract.

mateja
Download Presentation

Poznan - 21 November 2002 Dr. Ir. Matthijs Soede Senter/EG-Liaison The Netherlands

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. “Practical Aspects of Preparation FP6 projects Poznan - 21 November 2002 Dr. Ir. Matthijs Soede Senter/EG-Liaison The Netherlands m.soede@egl.nl

  2. Content • From idea to the contract • How to get into a consortium • Evaluation Criteria • Questions

  3. From idea to the contract

  4. From idea to the contract • Define your project - fit with FP6? • Read Workprogramme and Guide for proposers carefully • Draft first pages • Finding partners • Consortium Agreement • Writing proposal • Submitting proposal before the deadline • Evaluation of proposal • Contract negotiations • Contract

  5. Timing

  6. Consortium agreementis needed in an early stage

  7. How to get into a consortium?

  8. Expressions of Interest

  9. National/Regional Contact Point system • Giving information and advice about FP5/6 • In every country - partners can ask for information in their own country! • Building bridges between Brussels and the research society • Giving support with finding partners

  10. Evaluation Criteria

  11. Evaluation Criteria • Relevance to the objectives of the programme • Potential Impact • Scientific and Technological excellence • Quality of the consortium • Quality of the management • Mobilisaton of resources

  12. Size Integrated Project 24 Million Euro for 4 years 20 Million Euro for personnel 1 researcher = 80000 Euro per year 20 Million Euro = 250 research years Project 4 year: 62,5 researchers per year!!!!

  13. Relevance to the objectives of the programme • addressing the scientific, technical, socio-economic and policy objectives • Objective “Lisbon”:to allow the Union becomingthe most dynamic and most competitive knowledge-based economy within 10 years • Objective “Göteborg”:sustainable development (environment, economy, employment) • ERA:…Integrating, reinforcing, structuring

  14. Example topic from priority 3 NMP • Mastering chemistry and creating new processing pathways for multifunctional materials - IP; NE; STREP; CA • The overall objective is to maintain and extend Europe’s lead in chemical technologies, building on skills and respecting the environment, and also to provide benefits in other intermediary and end-user sectors. RTD objectives should include, among others, new strategies and optimisation of chemical reactivity and catalysis, development of supra-molecular and macromolecular engineering, product formulation, new solvent routes, chemistry and new synthesis routes for eco-materials

  15. Innovation Time Integration is key in Priority 3 for... Structuring ERA: RTD organisations, Industry, Services, Users & funding sources Strategic objectives: leadership, cost-effectiveness, added value, sustainable growth, health & safety, cleaner environment, etc. Complementary activities: demos, education, training, information exchange with users, dissemination, legal & financial environment, IPR, etc Research: on enabling & hybrid technologies, i.e. design & engineering, clean technologies, materials science, social sciences, nanotechnology, etc supporting changes in production & consumption paradigms

  16. Potential Impact • Suitably ambitious in terms of its strategic impact on reinforcing competitiveness or on solving societal problems • Optimal use of the project results • Clear added value in carrying out the work at European level

  17. Scientific and Technological excellence • Clearly defined objectives • the objective represent clear progress beyond the current state-of-the-art • The proposed S&T approach is likely to enable the project to achieve its objectives in research and innovation

  18. Quality of the consortium • The participants collectively constitute a consortium of high quality • Participants well suited and committed to the tasks assigned to them • Good complementarity • Profiles of partners clearly described • Opportunity of involving SME’s has been adequately addressed • YOU NEED MOTIVATED PARTNERS

  19. Quality of the management • The organisational structure is well-matched to the complexity of the project and to the degree of integration required • Project management is demonstrably of high quality • Satisfactory plan for the management of knowledge,of intellectual property and of other innovation related activities

  20. Ethical aspects, science-society dialogue Training strong management structure RTD 4 RTD 5 Management RTD 1 RTD 3 RTD 2 Implementation Plan Demonstration Technology transfer, exploitation Management Integrated projects • Project coordination team • Scientific board

  21. Governing Council Funding Bodies Representatives  To structure the EU research potential by integrating research capacities European Commission • Joint research activities • Integrating activities • Spreading of excellence • Common management Management Group Management Group Research team leader Partner Organisation Representative Networks of Excellence

  22. Mobilisation of resources • Consortium mobilises the critical mass of resources (personnel, equipment, finance….) • Resources are convincingly integrated to form a coherent project • The overall financing plan for the project is adequate.

  23. Questions

  24. Good luck

More Related