1 / 19

Summary

TeV gamma-ray astronomy with Cherenkov telescopes MAGIC Technical features Results LS I +61 303 MAGIC as a neutrino telecope Conclusions. Summary. Gamma-ray. GLAST (slightly magnified). Particle shower. ~ 10 km. ~ 1 o. Cherenkov Light. ~ 120 m. Cherenkov telescopes.

masao
Download Presentation

Summary

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TeV gamma-ray astronomy with Cherenkov telescopes • MAGIC • Technical features • Results • LS I +61 303 • MAGIC as a neutrino telecope • Conclusions Summary

  2. Gamma-ray GLAST (slightly magnified) Particle shower ~ 10 km ~ 1o Cherenkov Light ~ 120 m Cherenkov telescopes Collection area: ~ 105 m2 Important since gamma-rays at these energies are rare (1/m2 month)

  3. Imaging technique Image intensity Primary energy Image orientation  Prim. direction Image shape  Primary nature

  4. Stereoscopy Better determination Primary energy Primary nature Better signal/background discrimination

  5. Cherenkov images are parameterized by the light distribution (shape, position and orientation) Image parameterization (1) Shape:g –rays are narrower than cosmic rays. (2) Orientation:g-rays point to the source: excess at small alpha Getting rid of the background (CR) ON: Pointing to source Crab Nebula g CR OFF: Pointing somewhere else

  6. 17 m MAGIC is located at La Palma, Canary Islands (Northern Hemisphere) • The existing technology has been carried to the limit to improve sensitiity and lower the energy threshold: • The largest reflector, 17 m diameter → lowest energy threshold (100 GeV) • A 3.5 FOV camera with 577 PMTs (QE=30%) • An ultra-light structure (carbon-fiber) that allows for fast repositioning (40s) • Signal transmition through optical fiber to reduce noise • Dinamical mirror position correction thanks to a laser system • The existing technology has been carried to the limit to improve sensitiity and lower the energy threshold: • The largest reflector, 17 m diameter → lowest energy threshold (100 GeV) • A 3.5 FOV camera with 577 PMTs (QE=30%) • An ultra-light structure (carbon-fiber) that allows for fast repositioning (40s) • Signal transmition through optical fiber to reduce noise • Dinamical mirror position correction thanks to a laser system • The existing technology has been carried to the limit to improve sensitiity and lower the energy threshold: • The largest reflector, 17 m diameter → lowest energy threshold (100 GeV) • A 3.5 FOV camera with 577 PMTs (QE=30%) • An ultra-light structure (carbon-fiber) that allows for fast repositioning (40s) • Signal transmition through optical fiber to reduce noise • Dinamical mirror position correction thanks to a laser system • The existing technology has been carried to the limit to improve sensitiity and lower the energy threshold: • The largest reflector, 17 m diameter → lowest energy threshold (100 GeV) • A 3.5 FOV camera with 577 PMTs (QE=30%) • An ultra-light structure (carbon-fiber) that allows for fast repositioning (40s) • Signal transmition through optical fiber to reduce noise • Dinamical mirror position correction thanks to a laser system • The existing technology has been carried to the limit to improve sensitiity and lower the energy threshold: • The largest reflector, 17 m diameter → lowest energy threshold (100 GeV) • A 3.5 FOV camera with 577 PMTs (QE=30%) • An ultra-light structure (carbon-fiber) that allows for fast repositioning (40s) • Signal transmition through optical fiber to reduce noise • Dinamical mirror position correction thanks to a laser system • The existing technology has been carried to the limit to improve sensitiity and lower the energy threshold: • The largest reflector, 17 m diameter → lowest energy threshold (100 GeV) • A 3.5 FOV camera with 577 PMTs (QE=30%) • An ultra-light structure (carbon-fiber) that allows for fast repositioning (40s) • Signal transmition through optical fiber to reduce noise • Dinamical mirror position correction thanks to a laser system The MAGIC telescope

  7. Active Mirror Control Super-light structure (65 t), to catch GRBs AMC and fast movement Jupiter before and after focusing

  8. MAGIC-II: • Second telescope, completionin 2007 • Stereo  high purity gamma samples  better physics (lower threshold and better sensitivity) • MAGIC-1.5: • Running since February’07. • 2 GHz readout • Power of timing information under study MAGIC near future

  9. PWN Pulsars Astrophysics Fundamental Physics AGNs Binaries mQSRs GRBs Physics with 100 GeV-10 TeV g-rays SNRs cosmological g-Ray Horizon Origin of CRs Cold Dark Matter Quantum Gravity effects

  10. VHE g fluxes → upper limits to n fluxes (unless strong absorption) • km3n detectors sensitivity: F(>1TeV) = 10-11n/cm2s → Crab nebulag-ray flux • Shell type supernova remnants with ~1 Crab flux in g-rays: RAJ1713.7-3946 and RAJ0852.0-4622 best explained by hadronic interactions (extension, morphology, hard spectrum up to 100 TeV) • PWN: well explained by leptonic models but room for ions accelerated in the pulsar relativistic wind: Vela-X, Crab • Compact binary systems: LS5039 and LSI+61303. Lower n flux F(>1TeV) = 10-12n/cm2s or more depending on g-ray production region • VHE n’s messengers of non-thermal processes involving hadronic interactions • Ultimate proof of Galactic CR origin g p0 g p m p (TeV-PeV) p± nm nm + photo-meson interaction in high magnetic fields VHE n/g connection

  11. PSR B1951+32 HESS J1834 • Observations from November 2004 to May 2006 • About 25% total observation time for Galactic targets (apart from Crab Nebula) • Targets include: • SNR: • Intense EGRET sources • HESS galactic scan sources (HESS J1834, HESS J1813) • PWN • Pulsars: limits to Crab, PSR B1957, PSR B1951 • Binaries/microquasars (low and high mass) • LS I +61 303 variable source • Galactic Center • HEGRA Unidentified TeV2032 • Cataclysmic variable (AE Aquari) Observation cycle I

  12. LS I +61 303: • High Mass x-ray binary at a distance of 2 kpc • Optical companion is a B0 Ve star of 10.7 mag with a circumstellar disc • Compact object probably a neutron star • High eccentricity or the orbit (0.7) • Modulation of the emission from radio to x-rays with period 26.5 days attributed to orbital period • Secondary modulation of period 4 years attributed to changes in the Be star equatorial disc 0.4 AU 0.7 0.5 0.3 To observer LS I +61 303 0.9 0.2 0.1

  13. LSI +61 303 Detected by MAGIC Hartman et al. 1999 LS5039 Detected by HESS • LSI was temptatively associated to an EGRET source (<10 GeV) EGRET sources

  14. We observed LS I +61 303 with MAGIC for 54 horas between November 2005 and March 2006 (6 orbital cycles) LS I +61 303 by MAGIC Albert et al. 2006 • LS I +61 303 is a VHE gamma-ray emitter: • The flux is variable • It is modulated by the orbital motion (first indication of periodicity) • The peak of intensity is far from periastron • Results from another 4 orbital cycles obs. during fall 2006 published soon

  15. MAGIC has observed LSI during 6 orbital cycles • A variable flux above 400 GeV (probability of statistical fluctuation 310-5) detected • Marginal detections at phases 0.2-0.4 • Maximum flux detected at phase 0.6 with a 16% of the Crab Nebula flux • More luminous at these energies than at x-rays • Energy spectrum from 200 GeV to 4 TeV is well fitted by a power law with spectral index a= -2.6, no cutoff seen Flux time variability Albert et al. 2006

  16. Emission models • The broad-band experimental data on LSI may be explained both as produced by • relativistic jets (microquasar) • interaction of the winds of a young pulsar with that of the companion star. • In both cases the responsible may be accelerated electrons (Inverse Compton) or protons (pp interaction) → neutrinos!

  17. t nt • Ultra-high energy t-neutrinos (PeV energies or more) can be looked for using MAGIC (Fargion 2002) • tlifetime is 50 m at 1 PeV (1015eV) and hundreds of km for 1 EeV (1018eV) • 83% of the times the decay produces air showers observable by MAGIC • Feasibility studies in MAGIC started this observation cycle • Data taking→ background studies (scattered light) • Preliminary Sensitivity studies: • MAGIC not competitive for diffuse neutrinos • Identified best source candidates: • LS I +61 303 • 1ES1959 • 1ES2344 • No “normal” observation time is lost since it is done when clouds do not allow them MAGIC as a neutrino telescope

  18. New generation of Cherenkov telescopes are main actors of the recent burst of VHE astronomy • MAGIC has a major role with already 5 new discoveries and other interesting results • The compact binary system LS I +61 303 has been detected at TeV energies • The emission is variable • Possible hint of periodicity • The maximum of the emission happens 1/3 of the orbit away from periastron • The possibility of using MAGIC as a telescope for UHE neutrinos is under study Conclusions

More Related