1 / 37

Christian Kieling September 2010

INDEXATION ACHIEVED: WHAT’S NEXT?. Christian Kieling September 2010. WHY TO BE INDEXED. WHY TO BE INDEXED. WHY TO BE INDEXED. Kieling, Chen, Regier, and Rohde, in prep. INDEXATION DATABASES. HOW RBP GOT THERE. “DOUBLE” MISSION.

marlis
Download Presentation

Christian Kieling September 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. INDEXATION ACHIEVED: WHAT’S NEXT? Christian Kieling September 2010

  2. WHY TO BE INDEXED

  3. WHY TO BE INDEXED

  4. WHY TO BE INDEXED Kieling, Chen, Regier, and Rohde, in prep

  5. INDEXATION DATABASES

  6. HOW RBP GOT THERE

  7. “DOUBLE” MISSION • To disseminate the evidence based reviews and guidelines for clinical practice in local language to contribute to the update of mental health professionals in Brazil and neighbor countries. • To provide visibility of the Brazilian and Latin American [and LAMIC] scientific production in the field of mental health.

  8. HOW RBP GOT THERE • 1998 • New editors-in-chief (Jair Mari and Euripedes Miguel) appointed by the Brazilian Psychiatric Association • Professional executive editorship is created • 1999 • The name of the journal changes to RevistaBrasileira de Psiquiatria • Change in the national and international boards based on criteria of scientific productivity • Indexation in the Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO) - www.scielo.br/rbp • Decision to publish to annual supplements to meet educational needs Mari & Miguel, Rev Bras Psiq 2008

  9. 1999 – SciELO

  10. HOW RBP GOT THERE • 2000 • All original articles are reviewed by a statistician • 2001 • Technical review and translation into English of all original articles • 2002 • Original articles submitted in English • 2003 • Executive secretary in charge of managing the editorial process • RBP is indexed in Index Medicus/Medline Mari & Miguel, Rev Bras Psiq 2008

  11. 2003 – MEDLINE

  12. HOW RBP GOT THERE • 2005 • The number of original articles are fixed in 10 per issue, published only in English • Review and update articles are published in Portuguese • Supplements start being published in Portuguese (printed version) and both Portuguese and English (online version) • Fast-track policy for articles considered as having an exceptional quality is implemented • A native English speaker is in charge of reviewing the language • RBP is indexed in the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) Mari & Miguel, Rev Bras Psiq 2008

  13. 2005 – ISI

  14. HOW RBP GOT THERE • 2006 • RBP begins to publish online in-press articles (ahead of publication) in Medline • Creation of an exclusive website www.rbpbrasil.org.br • Creation of a RBP newsletter • 2007 • Implementation of a first online submission system (developed by SciELO) • 2008 • First impact factor: 1.225 (the highest among biomedical journals in Latin America) • 2009 • A new online submission system is implemented (ScholarOne Manuscripts) Mari & Miguel, Rev Bras Psiq 2008

  15. SUBMISSION SYSTEM

  16. SUBMISSION SYSTEM

  17. IMPACT FACTOR

  18. RBP 1.391 (2009) 1.225 1.318 (2007) (2008) Kieling & Gonçalves, Rev Bras Psiquiatr 29(2) 2007

  19. IMPACT FACTOR

  20. ALGORITHM Kieling & Gonçalves, Rev Bras Psiquiatr 29(2) 2007

  21. ALGORITHM

  22. LIMITATIONS

  23. LIMITATIONS Munafò, Mol Psychiatry 2009

  24. CITATIONS Kieling et al, unpublished Nillsson, Act Psych Scand 116(2) 2007

  25. CITATION CURVE

  26. IF IN PSYCHIATRY • IF are associated with other factors • area of knowledge • citations/article density • turnover • t½ approximately 7 years • cited half-life (received): 6.9 years • citing half-life (granted): 7,3 years Kieling & Gonçalves, Rev Bras Psiquiatr 29(2) 2007

  27. EDITORIAL BOARD • The editorial board was completely reformulated, increasing the representation of international investigators. • To deal with political pressures, scientific productivity was included as a criterion to select participants in the board. • The editorial board comprises 71 members: 37 from Brazil, 12 from United States, nine from England, and four from other Latin American countries.

  28. RBP • The Revista Brasileira de Psiquiatria is now a quarterly publication with two additional supplements dealing with topics of clinical practice and directed to update clinicians and mental health professionals. • The journal costs around US$ 200,000 yearly, but 90% of these costs are covered by the pharmaceutical industry (the remaining comes from the Brazilian Research Council). • RBP’s acceptation index reaches now 30%of submitted articles.

  29. RBP • Inclusion of members in the editorial board based on scientific productivity in the last five years. • An international board comprised by recognized investigators and truly related to the journal activities. • A rigid publishing timetable supported by a reliable income and stable editorial staff including clear succession plans. • Publishing original articles in English with free electronic access, and publishing educational and review articles in the original language. • Another important procedure was to invest in training current staff as well as future members of editorial teams. • Since 2004, the journal created three trainee editor positions for young investigators. Each of them works together with two senior editors learning the skills of scientific and peer review editing.

  30. RBP • Our activity has been developed in great harmony with ABP (Brazilian Psychiatry Association), reflecting a mature and understanding of its institutional role. • We also have to acknowledge that no progress could have been accomplished without the quantitative and qualitative growth of the Brazilian scientific production (associated to the expansion of post-graduate programs) and to the subsequent formation of researchers in the country, which has been translated not only in the submission of high-quality articles, but also in the high level of discernment of our reviewers.

  31. FUTURE

  32. PSYCHIATRY 2.0

  33. FUTURE http://beta.cell.com

  34. RBP – FUTURE

  35. FUTURE OF LMIC JOURNALS • Indexation is only the first step • Common problems and difficulties • Solutions could be built together • editorial board exchange • staff training • allocation of resources (eg, website, submission systems, language review) • Network of editors – continued work

  36. THANK YOU Trainee Editors: Giovanni Salum and Taís Moriyama Secretary: Fernanda Vergueiro

  37. EQUATOR http://www.equator-network.org

More Related