1 / 8

Protocol Consistency Checking of UML Statecharts

Protocol Consistency Checking of UML Statecharts. B.S. Barış Güldalı adapted from PG AQUASIUM@AG Engels-UPB. a1. :A. :B. e1. e3/send e4. e1. a2. a3. e2. /send e2. e3. e5. Consistency of UML Model. „Inconsistency is disagreement between sub-models“. Inconsistency between

marguerite-lefevre
Download Presentation

Protocol Consistency Checking of UML Statecharts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Protocol Consistency Checking of UML Statecharts B.S. Barış Güldalı adapted from PG AQUASIUM@AG Engels-UPB

  2. a1 :A :B e1 e3/send e4 e1 a2 a3 e2 /send e2 e3 e5 Consistency of UML Model „Inconsistency is disagreement between sub-models“ • Inconsistency between • Class diagram (CD), Sequence diagram (SeqD) • CD, Statechart diagram (SD) • SD, SeqD • SD, SD • ... Definitionen

  3. A.e4 p1 p4 B.e1 B.e3 p2 p3 A.e2 :A :B /send e1 a1 b1 e2/send e3 e1 e3/send e4 e4/send e1 b2 a2 a3 /send e2 Consistency of UML Model • Inconsistency between • CD, SeqD • CD, SD • SD, SeqD • SD, SD • ... • Protocol • consistency Definitionen

  4. Source of inconsistency : • UML without formal semantic • UML tools interpret differently • There is no automatic behaviour consistency • Three steps for automated consistency-check: • Informal definition of protocol-consistency • Definition of ... • ...model transformation from statecharts into CSP • ...consistency in CSP • Execution of model transformation, modelchecking via FDR • CSP (Communicating Sequential Processes): • formal specification language (process algebra) • FDR (Failures-Divergence Refinement): • commercial modelchecking tool Automated Consistency Check

  5. :StateMachine name=„LightControl“ sm:StateMachine top :CompositeState ε ::= <sm.name>(state) = if (state == <s.name>) then State(<s.name>) top cs:CompositeState subvertex :State subvertex name=„Red“ mapping s:State instantiation Model Tranformation: UML  CSP transformation UML Model CSP Model pattern matching match CSP Transformation UML Patern instantiated Definitionen Automated Consistency Check Model Transformation Case Study Modelchecking Conclusion

  6. Case Study UML CSP A(state) = if (state == a1) e1?x_e1  if (x_e1 == 1) A(a2) else A(a1) else if (state == a2) send_e2  A(a3) ... B(state) = if (state == init) send_e1  B(b1) else if (state == b1) e2?x_e2 if (x_e2 == 1) send_e3  B(b2) else A(b1) ... Definitionen Automated Consistency Check Model Transformation Case Study Modelchecking Conclusion P(p1) = B.e1  P(p2) P(p2) = A.e2  P(p3) P(p3) = B.e3  P(p4) P(p4) = A.e4  P(p1) System = A ||| B

  7. Modelchecking • traces(P) = set of finite sequences of events which P can do • Consistency definition: • Trace refinement: • assert P(p1) [T= System • assert System [T = P(p1) • Modelchecker FDR • Assert fails: • protocol and statecharts are not conform Definitionen Automated Consistency Check Model Transformation Case Study Modelchecking Conclusion

  8. UML is informal  consistency problem transform into a formal domain make a consistency definition Modelcheck Conclusion Future Work Definitionen Automated Consistency Check Model Transformation Case Study Modelchecking Conclusion • Consistency-check for deadlock • Consistency-check between SeqD & SD • Transformation into other formal models

More Related