E N D
3. institutional forces lead to lowered standards
from genius test to entitlement
expansion of subject matter
life forms, software, business methods
“stronger” patents
heightened presumption of validity
routine injunctions
portfolio races
trolls
5. 1999 WIPO Medium-Term Plan 2. The main objectives of WIPO, as expressed in the Medium Term Plan 1996-1999, remained constant in the past: "maintenance and further development of the respect of intellectual property throughout the world. It means that any erosion of the existing protection should be prevented," and "that both, the acquisition of the protection and, once acquired, its enforcement, should be simpler, cheaper and more secure."
7. Given its increasing global relevance, the intellectual property system cannot continue to evolve as an issue limited in scope and focused mainly on maintaining and developing intellectual property rights protection. The more intellectual property becomes central to economic growth and wealth creation, the greater will be the challenge of developing the international intellectual property system in a way that it be instrumental to social and economic development.
6. 2003 WIPO Medium-Term Plan 3. The main objectives of the Medium-term Plan, as expressed in the past remain constant: maintenance and further development of the respect for intellectual property throughout the world. This means that any erosion of the existing protection should be prevented, and that both the acquisition of the protection and, once acquired, its enforcement, should be simpler, cheaper and more secure.
4. The objectives mentioned above are mandated by the Convention Establishing the World Intellectual Property Organization, Article 3 of which clearly states:
(i) to promote the protection of intellectual property throughout the world….
7. evolution of USPTO Mission 2000:
“to help customers get patents”
2001:
“to promote industrial and technological progress in the United States and strengthen the economy”
2002:
“to ensure that the intellectual property system contributes to a strong global economy, encourages investment in innovation, fosters entrepreneurial spirit, and enhances the quality of life for everyone”
8. recent economic approaches FTC report
10. sector-specific issues pharmaceuticals
ethics, access to essential medicines
parallel importation
biotechnology
anticommons, royalty-stacking
access to scientific knowledge, research tools, useful information
11. sector-specific issues II computers and semiconductors
complex technology, centered on cross-licensing
strategic behavior, portfolio effects
information failure, hold-up
software and Internet
extreme strategic behavior, information failure, and hold-up
market access
impact on open source
user exposure to liability
nontechnical patents (business methods)
12. business method problem
activities, not technology
one “broad” patent covers many
products/implementations
software problem
extreme complexity
one product encompasses
many “trivial” patents
13. business method problem
“…[W]ith the advent of business method patenting it is possible to obtain exclusive rights over a general business model, which can include ALL solutions to a business problem, simply by articulating the problem.”
IBM, Comments on the International Effort to Harmonize the Substantive Requirements of Patent Laws [USPTO consultation, May 2001] On the other hand, when some of IPO’s members speak for themselvesOn the other hand, when some of IPO’s members speak for themselves
15. “[T]here are too many patents to be able to even locate which ones are problematic. I used to say only IBM does clearance … but IBM tells me even they don't do clearance searches anymore.”
Robert Barr, Vice President, Worldwide Patent Counsel, Cisco Systems, Inc., FTC Roundtable, October 2002
16. I speak with my fellow in-house counsel in the software industry frequently. There is an amazing degree of unanimity about software patents. We all hate them.
Martin Konopken, Autodesk
As I'm sure this committee is aware, there is a general animosity to pure software patents within and outside of the industry….
Bradford Friedman, Cadence Design
17. recent economic approaches FTC report
OECD project
EPO hires chief economist
EC solicitations
value of the patent system (DG Internal Market, July 2004)
longitudinal study of effects on software (DG Information Society, August 2004)
18. insights from Mansfield/Levin/Cohen surveys patents are one of many means of “appropriating returns from innovation”
secrecy, first-mover advantages, complements, etc.
mix from industry to industry
patents are of minor importance in most industries, with some exceptions, notably pharmaceuticals
19. factors favoring control well-defined development path
need for capital to further develop and market product
substantial barriers to entry / high sunk costs
high market value relative to transaction costs
limited but sustainable market
readily usable in commerce
20. factors favoring openness opportunities are difficult to identify
a broad set of potential applications
diversity of development approaches and perspectives
very large potential market (competition drives innovation)
very limited potential market (insufficient to attract investment, dependent on volunteers)
strong network effects (avoid danger of centralized control)
availability of complementary business models
application in research (unpredictable payoff, limited market)
21. recommendations clearinghouse
collaboration
capacity
principles
economic
accountability
transparency
understanding
participation
22. economic principles Patent standards should be sufficiently high that independent invention and inadvertent infringement rarely occur.
Patents should be granted only to induce invention that would not otherwise be made. (“but-for” principle)
Patents should optimize competition among producers of technology. Patents should not be asserted against downstream users and consumers.
23. economic principles II Patent policy should be results-oriented. A regime that is optimized for certain industries and works poorly in others is both inefficient and discriminatory.
Like other forms of market intervention, any “strengthening” of patents, lowering of standards, or expansion of subject matter must be justified in terms of overall costs and benefits.
Patents should be of sufficient quality to ensure that patents are read for their technical content and that patent information is efficiently cited and diffused.
The practice of innovation should not require regular consultation with lawyers.
24. accountability
Governments should monitor and evaluate the impact of the patent system on an ongoing basis
Patent quality should be evaluated by scientifically derived criteria.
Governments should collect information on scope, form, and nature of licensing transactions.
Publicly held companies should be required to report on patenting and licensing practices, including liabilities and contingencies.
Information about patent assertions, discoveries of prior art, and settlements should be a matter of public record.
25. recommendation:get a process going clearinghouse
collaboration
capacity
principles