1 / 35

Transnational Political A genda of Latino Immigrants

Transnational Political A genda of Latino Immigrants. The Case of H ometown Associations and Federations. Xóchitl Bada Latin American and Latino Studies Program University of Illinois at Chicago xbada@uic.edu. Immigrant C ivic E ngagement: S pheres of Action.

maegan
Download Presentation

Transnational Political A genda of Latino Immigrants

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Transnational Political Agenda of Latino Immigrants The Case of Hometown Associations and Federations Xóchitl Bada Latin American and Latino Studies Program University of Illinois at Chicago xbada@uic.edu

  2. Immigrant Civic Engagement: Spheres of Action Hometown Associations, indigenous groups, and other ethnic organizations (soccer leagues, cultural organizations, FIOB) Unions and Independent Worker Centers for day laborers, local school councils farmworkers, (Workplace Project, LíderesCampesinas, NDLON, CIW, FLOC) Faith-based organizations (immigrant congregations and ecumenical religious initiatives) Ex: Journey of Hope, Tepeyac Association’s Binational Torch Non-Profit migrant-led independent media in Spanish (Radio, TV, Newspapers, Digital Disaporas) Traditional/Historical Latino Organizations: LULAC, MALDEF, NCLR, and NALEO

  3. What is an HTA? HTAs often begin as informal associations, such as soccer clubs, mutual aid societies or prayer groups, but over time many have not only become formal organizations, but have also “scaled up” to form federations that represent various communities of origin from the same sending state. Sometimes these clubs create larger coalitions, including federations of different states. Though many group migrants from rural communities of origin, HTAs are predominantly concentrated in metropolitan areas in the United States. Also known as clubes de oriundos, or migrant clubs, Mexican HTAs are among the best-known migrant-led organizations.

  4. How are HTA’s organized? • There are four organizational levels: • The INFORMAL Group (Extended family networks, friends, and fictitious kin ties around faith, sports, rotary credits, mutual aid societies, public work committees) • The FORMAL club, committee, or association (Migrants coming from the same village and/or municipality including family members born elsewhere) • The INSTITUTIONALIZED Federation (Migrant members of several HTAs from the same state plus sympathizers and family members born elsewhere) • The COALITION OF FEDERATIONS (Several federations make an alliance for cooperation in transnational issues)

  5. Family Remittance Senders in Latin America who Belong to a HTA • Ecuador 10% • Haiti 10% • Honduras 7% • Colombia 6% • Nicaragua 4% • El Salvador 4% • Mexico 4% • Dom. Rep. 3% • Guatemala 3% • Bolivia 1% Source: Orozco and Rouse, 2007

  6. Mexican HTAs by State of Destination HTAs are distributed in 17 states (34% U.S. territory) They are heavily concentrated in 3 states (CA, IL, TX get 88% of the total) Distribution is now including new destinations (N. Carolina, Utah, Georgia) Source: Ministry of Foreign Relations, 2003

  7. Mexican HTAs by state of origin 17 Mexican states are represented (53%) They are heavily concentrated in 5 states (Zac., Jal., Gro., Mich., Gto., get 60% of the total) Distribution now includes states that are less historical and more indigenous (Oax., Pue., Ver., Hgo. Tlax.)

  8. Number of Mexican State Hometown Associations in metropolitan Chicago (1994-2006) Sources: Orozco (2002) and Mexican Consulate database of Mexican organizations in Chicago (2006)

  9. Mexican hometown associations in Chicago by state of origin 2005 Source: Mexican Consulate-IME Chicago

  10. Binational Political Agenda: Immigration: legalization, naturalization, electoral participation, and immigrant integration Dissemination: Educate public on root causes of migration Education: improve access and opportunities Labor: Worker rights and unionization Civil Society: Participation and Networking Healthcare: improve access and outreach Housing: first time buyers, foreclosure prevention Development: Promote small businesses, and jobs creation Accountability: Transparency and participatory budgeting Remittances: reduce sending costs and increase public funds for collective remittance projects to reduce effects of neoliberal economic restructuring

  11. Three-for-One for Migrants Program Overview: • Total federal investment in 2002: 10 million dollars • Total federal investment in 2008: 22 million dollars • Total federal budget is less than 1% of public investment for development • For every dollar collected in VAT income captured from expenditure of remittances, the government contributed three cents on the dollar in 2008 to the3X1 program • Between 2002-2010, 13,599 projects have been completed. • Only 4% of projects are productive investments • 82% of the investment is received from 3 states in the U.S.: California, Illinois, and Texas. • In 2002, 20 migrant groups participated. In 2010, the program collaborated with 421 HTAs based in 31 states in the U.S. and some in Canada. • The projects have benefited 28 Mexican States

  12. SEDESOL, 2011

  13. Tomato green house in the village of San Rafael, municipality of Santa Ana Maya. Project financed with 3X1 federal matching funds and organized migrants from San Rafael and Tzitzio living Chicago and Joliet, IL. 3X1 in Michoacán, period 2002-2004: 253 projects (of those, only 30 were categorized as productive) Chicago-based organizations supported 26 projects (10% of the total)

  14. Benches and basketball court in Las Cruces, municipality of Churintzio, summer of 2004

  15. Public park in Ecuandureo, municipal town center, located in the Bajío Zamorano region. Project paid for by municipality 96-98 and Chicago residents.

  16. Local School Councils (More than 1,300 Latino last names out of 5,901 members= 22%), • Mujeres Latinas en Acción • Erie Neighborhood House • Casa Michoacán • Chicago Cultural Alliance • Illinois Arts Council • Pilsen Environmental Rights and Resource Organization (PERRO) • Little Village Environmental Justice Organization (LVEJO) • Enlace Chicago • Hispanic Ministry of Chicago Catholic Archdiocese • De Paul University • University of Illinois at Chicago • The Resurrection Project (Affordable Housing) • Chicago Latin American Soccer Association (CLASA has 428 teams, mostly Mexican) Local Networks for Latino Immigrant Civic Engagement

  17. Main political networks in Chicago • Democratic Party representatives • Republican Party representatives (Abuelitas Program) • Mexican National Action Party of the Midwest (PAN) • Mexican Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD) • VanguardiaMigrante(PRI) • BinationalMichoacanoFront (FREBIMICH) • International Coalition of Mexicans Abroad • Coalition for the Political Rights of Mexicans Abroad • Institute for Mexicans Abroad’s Advisory Board (IME)

  18. Networks with local/national/transnational advocacy organizations • Coalitions and Alliances: • March 10th movement • Institute for Mexicans Abroad (IME) Advisory Board • National Alliance of Latin American and Caribbean Communities (NALACC) • Confederation of Mexican Federations in the Midwest (CONFEMEX) • Mexican Consulate Protection Network • Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights • Latino Policy Forum • IniciativaCiudadanaA. C.

  19. Networks with Donors, Banks, and Labor Organizations • Rockefeller Foundation • Ford Foundation • Inter-American Foundation • Inter-American Development Bank • First Data Corp/Western Union • Heartland Alliance for Human Needs and Human Rights • MacArthur Foundation • Donors Forum • Chicago Community Trust • IniciativaCiudadanapara la Promoción de la Cultura del Diálogo, A.C. • Instituto Federal de Acceso a la Información • Solidago Foundation • AFL-CIO International Solidarity (2000)

  20. Challenges to Transnational Political AgendasCommon misconception in the US of immigrants as political actors. Mexican immigrants should pay more attention to politics here where they live. Immigrants are involved in local civic participation through their grassroots organizations. Mexican immigrants should invest their money here in the US. Low income immigrants earning less than $20,000 per year, invest 82% of their income to sustain themselves in the US Mexican immigrants will never assimilate. Immigrants will assimilate differently than their predecessors. Some will naturalize choosing to participate only in US politics will others (likely a minority) will be binational and will participate civically and politically in both home and host societies.

  21. Mexican HTAs in cities with large immigrant demonstrations in 2006

  22. CONFEMEX PRESENCE IN CHICAGO MARCHES, 2006

  23. Main Barriers to Latino Naturalization • Increased Application Fees • New Exam goes into effect in October • New Backlogs are rapidly increasing • Lower Educational attainment /Literacy Levels compared to other ethnic groups • Lack of information about dual citizenship laws • Dilemma of returning to countries of origin • Limited access to improve/acquire skills in English • Lack of coordinated government sponsored national efforts to encourage LPRs to become citizens • Fear/Anxieties over immigration records and the highly complex bureaucratic process

  24. Main Opportunities to Latino Naturalization • Dual nationality/citizenship in many Latin American Countries • Recession and immigration restrictions are reducing circular migration • National Media coalitions are implementing successful campaigns (YEH) • Immigrant mobilization towards Comprehensive Immigration Reform • New Citizens are likely to convince others to apply to citizenship • New Naturalizations had a visible impact in 2008 presidential elections • Increased political competition attracts interest to participate in elections • Some states are becoming interested in sponsoring naturalization campaigns (IL, NJ) • National League of Cities recently launched an immigrant incorporation initiative

  25. Potential for greater civic engagement: Mexicans are steadily catching up • Proposition 187 in California, Dual nationality Law , and the tightening of the immigration laws in 1996 encourage many to become citizens • In 1995, only 20% of eligible Mexican immigrants had become citizens, but that rate rose 15 percentage points by 2005 • By comparison, 57% of Asians have naturalized in the past 20 years. • Between 1995-2005, the share of Mexicans who naturalized rose 75% , compared with a 20% increase for all others. • By 2008, 2 million eligible Mexicans had acquired US citizenship while 2.5 millions remained as LPRs

  26. Universe of Immigrants from Latin American eligible to Naturalize (qualifying LPRs)

  27. Living up to the 2006 Promise: “Today we March, Tomorrow we Vote” Source: NALEO (2009)

  28. Source: U.S. Department of Homeland Security

  29. Source: U.S. Department of Homeland Security

  30. Conclusions • Binational groups are attempting to alter their relations with the nation-state, from a market membership to full political participation in home and host country affairs • Local context matters for extending civic engagement towards domestic arenas. There are marked differences between integration opportunities in urban and rural destinations • HTAs and federations function as a bridge to economic, social, and political incorporation of first generation immigrants to US society • There is not enough evidence to believe that membership to HTAs will significantly delay incorporation to American society • Hybridization of political values and cultural manifestations is clearly observed in organized migrant practices • Second generation will have easier access to cross-border political memberships

  31. Latin American Immigrant Civic Participation Project Cities included in the study: Chicago, Illinois Washington, D.C Los Angeles, California Omaha, Nebraska Fresno, California Charlotte, North Carolina Tucson, Arizona San José, California Las Vegas, Nevada Mexico Institute, Latin American Program, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars: http://www.wilsoncenter.org/migrantparticipation. In collaboration with Andrew Selee (Wilson Center) and Jonathan Fox (University of California, Santa Cruz

More Related