1 / 10

Secretariat of National ISCCJ; and

Presentation to Portfolio Committee on Justice and Constitutional Development: Progress report on implementation of Child Justice Act, 2008 (Act No 75 of 2008): National Department of Justice and Constitutional Development. Secretariat of National ISCCJ; and

lyndon
Download Presentation

Secretariat of National ISCCJ; and

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Presentation to Portfolio Committee on Justice and Constitutional Development: Progress report on implementation of Child Justice Act, 2008 (Act No 75 of 2008): National Department of Justice and Constitutional Development Secretariat of National ISCCJ; and Chief Directorate: Promotion of the Rights of Vulnerable Persons: 23 February 2010

  2. Child Justice Act, 2008: Readiness for implementation: DoJCD:

  3. Plans for implementation of the Child Justice Act, 2008:

  4. Plans for implementation: DoJ+CD, continued:

  5. Plans for implementation: DoJ+CD, continued:

  6. Plans for implementation: DoJCD, continued:

  7. Functions of the ISCCJ: • The functions of the Inter-Sectoral Child Justice Steering Committee (ISCCJ) (once the NPF has been drafted) and specified in Section 96(1) include: • monitoring the implementation of the national policy framework and this Act; and • the establishment of an integrated information management system to enable effective monitoring, analysis of trends and interventions, • to map the flow of children through the child justice system and to provide quantitative and qualitative data relating, among others, to arrest or methods of securing attendance at criminal proceedings; • assessment; • preliminary inquiries; • diversion; • children awaiting trial; • bail and placement; • trials; • sentencing; • appeals and reviews; • sexual offences committed by children; • children who lack criminal capacity as provided for in section 7(1); and • any other relevant factor.

  8. Present oversight Committees • National Intersectoral Child Justice Steering Committee (ISCCJ). • Child Justice Act, 2008, now provides mandate for ISCCJ on DG’s level, to meet on a bi-annual basis and report to Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development within 30 days. • Present Government Departments’ ISCCJ on Chief Director and Director-level, to support DG’s ISCCJ (policy and strategic recommendations). • Consists of various Government Departments concerned, and includes Lower Court Management Committee of the Judiciary and Legal Aid SA. • ISCCJ also meets on regular basis with NGO’s; universities and Chapter 9-institutions; the National House of Traditional Leaders and the Judicial Inspectorate of Prisons. • Supported by nine (9) Provincial Child Justice Fora, chaired by the Regional Heads of the DoJCD in each province, who reports on a monthly basis to the ISCCJ.

  9. Challenges: • Inadequate budget allocations. • Cluster budget bids made in both 2008/09 and 2009/10. • No Cluster budget received for 2009/10 – Departments had to reprioritise from Departmental funds. • For 2010/11, the Cluster requested R660,961,799.00, for all Departments involved; and R124,689,590 for the DoJCD. • For 2010/11, the JCPS Cluster received R30 million, for implementation purposes of the DoJCD, NPA and LASA, which will be divided equally between the 3 Units. • Concern – other Departments such as DSD and DCS made their own bids, but received no additional Cluster budgets. • The primary areas affected include: • One Stop Child Justice Centres require both ongoing and capital expenditure and current budgets do not allow for the establishment of further centres as described in the Act. • Diversion of child offenders requires the provision of diversion services and this requires a substantial additional budget especially in under-resourced rural areas. • Implementation of the Act requires a substantial paradigm shift in both the Judiciary and personnel within the system; this requires a substantial training budget which is not covered in existing departmental operational budgets. • Additional staff will be required by almost every department to provide for the additional functions and increased service levels demanded by the Act.

  10. QUESTIONS ?Thank you.

More Related