1 / 28

Philae Science team meeting

Philae Science team meeting. 1. Instrument status. Final discussion and wrap-up. Venezia , March 30, 31, April 1, 2009. Palazzo Cavalli Franchetti. Philae Science team meeting. 1. Instrument status ● More than fair for all 10 investigations. Most science initial goals met.

lumina
Download Presentation

Philae Science team meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Philae Science team meeting 1. Instrument status Final discussion and wrap-up Venezia, March 30, 31, April 1, 2009 Palazzo Cavalli Franchetti

  2. Philae Science team meeting 1. Instrument status ●More than fair for all 10 investigations. Most science initial goals met. ● Unprecedented challenges (performance vs resources) overwent. ● All PCs were required to identify and fix issues. ● At P/L level, we are ready to operate at full capability and efficiency. ● Exemplary spirit of cooperation within the overall team. ● On behalf of all PI teams, utmost thanks to ESA, LCC and SONC.

  3. Philae Science team meeting 1. Instrument status 2. Upcoming activity: PC10 Final discussion and wrap-up Venezia, March 30, 31, April 1, 2009 Palazzo Cavalli Franchetti

  4. Philae Science team meeting 2. Upcoming activity: PC10 ●All requests from PI teams received and planned. ● If prioritization required, rationale could be: 1. COSAC (GC bypass to MS only) 2. MUPUS and SESAME: completion of calibration 3. all others, at equal level, with similar resource sharing

  5. Philae Science team meeting 1. Instrument status 2. Upcoming activity: PC10 3. Upcoming activity: ESB3 Final discussion and wrap-up Venezia, March 30, 31, April 1, 2009 Palazzo Cavalli Franchetti

  6. Philae Science team meeting 3. Upcoming activity: ESB3 ●All PI teams endorsed the proposal not to participate, to save resources (LCC/SONC) on more critical activity.

  7. Philae Science team meeting 1. Instrument status 2. Upcoming activity: PC10 3. Upcoming activity: ESB3 4. Upcoming activity: PC12 Final discussion and wrap-up Venezia, March 30, 31, April 1, 2009 Palazzo Cavalli Franchetti

  8. Philae Science team meeting 4. Upcoming activity: PC12 ●The focus is on CDMS SW 8.0 upload ● This SW should include all modes/sequences complying with SDL, FSS and LTS, as designed from present reference mission scenario. ● Major inputs from Project/PIs are due no later than April 30, 2009 ● The next SDL/LTS workshop meetings (April 27/28) critical. ● Herebelow are proposed some driving principles.

  9. Suggested SDL principles Goal: simplify CDMS SW towards increased robustness 1. Automated emergency release if nominal release fails (time out) 2. Single descent sequence (no dependent on nominal/emergency) 3. Single TouchDown (TD) signal used (the less sensitive LG trigger) 4. Reception of TD signal disabled for a mission analysis driven duration 5. Anchoring sequence based on TD signal (no time out trigger) 6. FSS start triggered by TD signal or timeout (emergency release based) 7. ROLIS start at a mission analysis based time 8. ROLIS stop triggered by TC at a mission analysis based time

  10. Suggested SDL principles Goal: simplify CDMS SW towards increased robustness 1. Automated emergency release if nominal release fails (time out) 2. Single descent sequence (no dependent on nominal/emergency) 3. Single TouchDown (TD) signal used (the less sensitive LG trigger) 4. Reception of TD signal disabled for a mission analysis driven duration 5. Anchoring sequence based on TD signal (no time out trigger) 6. FSS start triggered by TD signal or timeout (emergency release based) 7. ROLIS start at a mission analysis based time 8. ROLIS stop triggered by TC at a mission analysis based time

  11. nominal release emergency release TD TD

  12. Suggested SDL principles Goal: simplify CDMS SW towards increased robustness 1. Automated emergency release if nominal release fails (time out) 2. Single descent sequence (no dependent on nominal/emergency) 3. Single TouchDown (TD) signal used (the less sensitive LG trigger) 4. Reception of TD signal disabled for a mission analysis driven duration 5. Anchoring sequence based on TD signal (no time out trigger) 6. FSS start triggered by TD signal or timeout (emergency release based) 7. ROLIS start at a mission analysis based time 8. ROLIS stop triggered by TC at a mission analysis based time

  13. nominal release emergency release TD signal reception disabled TD signal TD signal

  14. Suggested SDL principles Goal: simplify CDMS SW towards increased robustness 1. Automated emergency release if nominal release fails (time out) 2. Single descent sequence (no dependent on nominal/emergency) 3. Single TouchDown (TD) signal used (the less sensitive LG trigger) 4. Reception of TD signal disabled for a mission analysis driven duration 5. Anchoring sequence based on TD signal (no time out trigger) 6. FSS start triggered by TD signal or timeout (emergency release based) 7. ROLIS start at a mission analysis based time 8. ROLIS stop triggered by TC at a mission analysis based time

  15. Suggested SDL principles Goal: simplify CDMS SW towards increased robustness 1. Automated emergency release if nominal release fails (time out) 2. Single descent sequence (no dependent on nominal/emergency) 3. Single TouchDown (TD) signal used (the less sensitive LG trigger) 4. Reception of TD signal disabled for a mission analysis driven duration 5. Anchoring sequence based on TD signal (no time out trigger) assumption: if hard surface, TD signal generated, followed by anchoring if soft surface and TD not generated, anchoring not required

  16. nominal release emergency release TD signal reception disabled TD signal TD signal anchoring after TD signal

  17. Suggested SDL principles Goal: simplify CDMS SW towards increased robustness 1. Automated emergency release if nominal release fails (time out) 2. Single descent sequence (no dependent on nominal/emergency) 3. Single TouchDown (TD) signal used (the less sensitive LG trigger) 4. Reception of TD signal disabled for a mission analysis driven duration 5. Anchoring sequence based on TD signal (no time out trigger) 6. FSS start triggered by TD signal or timeout (emergency release based) 7. ROLIS start at a mission analysis based time 8. ROLIS stop triggered by TC at a mission analysis based time

  18. nominal release emergency release TD signal reception disabled TD signal FSS starts (from TD signal) TD signal FSS starts (from TD signal)

  19. nominal release emergency release TD signal reception disabled FSS starts (from time out)

  20. Suggested SDL principles Goal: simplify CDMS SW towards increased robustness 1. Automated emergency release if nominal release fails (time out) 2. Single descent sequence (no dependent on nominal/emergency) 3. Single TouchDown (TD) signal used (the less sensitive LG trigger) 4. Reception of TD signal disabled for a mission analysis driven duration 5. Anchoring sequence based on TD signal (no time out trigger) 6. FSS start triggered by TD signal or timeout (emergency release based) 7. ROLIS start triggered by TC at a mission analysis based time 8. ROLIS stop triggered by TC at a mission analysis based time

  21. nominal release emergency release TD signal reception disabled ROLIS starts (from MA timing) ROLIS stops (from TC)

  22. Suggested SDL principles Goal: simplify CDMS SW towards increased robustness 1. Automated emergency release if nominal release fails (time out) 2. Single descent sequence (no dependent on nominal/emergency) 3. Single TouchDown (TD) signal used (the less sensitive LG trigger) 4. Reception of TD signal disabled for a mission analysis driven duration 5. Anchoring sequence based on TD signal (no time out trigger) 6. FSS start triggered by TD signal or timeout (emergency release based) 7. ROLIS start triggered by TC at a mission analysis based time 8. ROLIS stop triggered by TC at a mission analysis based time 9. P/L prioritization: two tests cases (A+B, A+B+C). Actual priority later on.

  23. Suggested LTS principles Goal: enabling Philae survival post FSS to enter LTS ASAP 1. Load is on CDMS S/W (8.0): we must minimize it 2. End the FSS in an optimized Philae orientation. Goal: 3. Rotate after deep sample analyses, before PEN and APXS deployments 4. Power battery managing focused on survival (no science) 5. Priority: enable communicating with Philae (TC reception) 6. LTS first phase (pre-conjunction) key to monitor activity onset 7. Mean free path might lead to lethal dust coverage 8. Priority be made on MUPUS & SESAME (no sample connected activity) 9. Envision SD2/COSAC/PTOLEMY/CIVA-M post conjunction only 10. Imaging (CIVA) depending on resources & upload constraints

  24. Philae Science team meeting 1. Instrument status 2. Upcoming activity: PC10 3. Upcoming activity: ESB3 4. Upcoming activity: PC12 5. Upcoming activity: Lutetia Final discussion and wrap-up Venezia, March 30, 31, April 1, 2009 Palazzo Cavalli Franchetti

  25. Philae Science team meeting 5. Upcoming activity: Lutetia ● Envisioned activity similar to that of Steins ● PTOLEMY (and CIVA, if orientation OK) possibly added ● Study the outgassing while illuminated (ROMAP + ROSINA)

  26. Philae Science team meeting 1. Instrument status 2. Upcoming activity: PC10 3. Upcoming activity: ESB3 4. Upcoming activity: PC12 5. Upcoming activity: Lutetia 6. Next meetings: LOWG, 5thSWT Final discussion and wrap-up Venezia, March 30, 31, April 1, 2009 Palazzo Cavalli Franchetti

  27. Philae Science team meeting 6. Next meetings: LOWG, 5thSWT ● LOWG: prior to PC12 (January 2010 typically, TBC) ● 5th SWT: post PC12 (June typically, TBC), at PTOLEMY premises

  28. Philae Science team meeting 1. Instrument status 2. Upcoming activity: PC10 3. Upcoming activity: ESB3 4. Upcoming activity: PC12 5. Upcoming activity: Lutetia 6. Next meetings: LOWG, 5thSWT 7. Mille gracie, Amalia 7. Mille gracie, Amalia Final discussion and wrap-up Venezia, March 30, 31, April 1, 2009 Palazzo Cavalli Franchetti

More Related