1 / 16

Umov effect for single-scattering agglomerate particles

Umov effect for single-scattering agglomerate particles. E. Zubko , 1,2 G. Videen, 3 Yu. Shkuratov, 2 K. Muinonen, 1,4 and T. Yamamoto 5. 1 Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Finland 2 Institute of Astronomy, Kharkov National University, Ukraine

lucio
Download Presentation

Umov effect for single-scattering agglomerate particles

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Umov effect for single-scattering agglomerate particles E. Zubko,1,2 G. Videen,3 Yu. Shkuratov,2 K. Muinonen,1,4 and T. Yamamoto5 1 Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Finland 2 Institute of Astronomy, Kharkov National University, Ukraine 3 Army Research Laboratory AMSRL-CI-EM, USA 4 Finnish Geodetic Institute, Finland 5 Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Japan May 8, 2012

  2. Polarimetry of Comets Dependence of polarization in comets on phase angle Circumstances of polarimetric observations

  3. Umov Effect The brighter powder, the lower its linear polarization N. Umov, Phys. Zeits. 6, 674-676 (1905) Origin of the phenomenon –depolarization due to multiple scattering in regolith N. Umov (1846-1915) In 1960-1970, the qualitative law was quantified: log(Pmax) linearly depends on log(A)

  4. Umov Effect Shkuratov & Opanasenko, Icarus 99, 468-484 (1992)

  5. Umov Effect for Single-Scattering Particles As was found in Zubko et al. (2011, Icarus, 212, 403– 415), the Umov effect holds also for single-scattering particles with size comparable to wavelength. Therefore, it can be applied to comets. Geometric albedo A for single particles: A=(S11(0))/(k2G) Here, S11(0) is the Mueller matrix element at back-scattering, k – wavenumber, and G – the geometric cross-section of the particle.

  6. Numerical Simulation of Light Scattering Method: Discrete Dipole Approximation (DDA) Basic idea: Gains:(1) arbitrary shape and internal structure (2) simplicity in preparation of sample particles

  7. Models for Cometary Dust Particles sparse agglomerate agglomerated debris pocked spheres ρ = 0.169 ρ = 0.236 ρ = 0.336

  8. Input Parameters for Simulation We study 21 (!) variousrefractive indices m: 1.2+0i 1.2+0.015i1.313+0i1.313+0.1i 1.4+0i1.4+0.0175i 1.4+0.02i 1.4+0.05i 1.4+0.1i 1.5+0i1.5+0.02i 1.5+0.05i 1.5+0.1i 1.6+0.0005i 1.6+0.02i 1.6+0.05i 1.6+0.1i 1.6+0.15i 1.7+0i1.7+0.1i1.855+0.45i Size parameter x=2r/ (r– radius of circumscribing sphere and – wavelength) is variedfrom 1 throughout 26 – 40 (depending on m).

  9. Averaging of light-scattering characteristics (1) Over particle shapes: For each pair of x and m, we consider minimum 500 particle shapes. (2) Over particle size: Size distribution is considered to be a power law r–a. The power index a is varied from 1 to 4. Note: this range is well consistent with in situ study of Comet 1P/Halley: 1.5a3.4 (Mazets et al., 1986)

  10. Application to whole Comet C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake)

  11. Application to whole Comet C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake)

  12. Application to whole Comet C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake)

  13. Application to innermost coma in 26P/Grigg-Skjellerup McBride et al., MNRAS 289, 535-553 (1997)

  14. Application to innermost coma in 26P/Grigg-Skjellerup

  15. Application to innermost coma in 26P/Grigg-Skjellerup

  16. Summary Using the Umov effect, one can estimate albedo of single-scattering dust particles. When this technique is applied to whole Comet C/1996 B2 (Hyakutake), it yields the geometric albedo in the range A=0.034–0.079, that is well consistent with the expected value of A=0.05. For the innermost coma studied by Giotto in 26P/Grigg-Skjellerup, the Umov effect reveals dramatically higher geometric albedo A=0.23.

More Related