1 / 17

X12 vs. EDIFACT Comparison and Contrast

X12 vs. EDIFACT Comparison and Contrast. Presented by Deb Williams. X12 vs. EDIFACT Comparison and Contrast. COMPARE. ANSI Transaction EDIFACT Message 810 Invoice INVOIC Invoice 830 Planning Schedule DELFOR Delivery Schedule

lot
Download Presentation

X12 vs. EDIFACT Comparison and Contrast

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. X12 vs. EDIFACT Comparison and Contrast Presented by Deb Williams

  2. X12 vs. EDIFACT Comparison and Contrast COMPARE ANSI Transaction EDIFACT Message 810 Invoice INVOIC Invoice 830 Planning Schedule DELFOR Delivery Schedule 850 Purchase Order ORDERS Purchase Order 856 Ship Manifest Notice DESADV Dispatch Advice 862 Shipping Schedule DELJIT Delivery Just In Time 997 Functional Ack. CONTRL Functional Ack.

  3. X12 vs. EDIFACT Comparison and Contrast EDIFACT International - UN EDI for Administration, Commerce and Transport Message Segment Groups (Loops) Segment Simple Data Element Composite Data Element ASC X12 North American - ANSI American National Standards Institute Transaction Set Segment Tables (Loops) Segment Elements Sub-element

  4. X12 vs. EDIFACT EDIFACT Groups Group 1 Group 2 Group 6 includes Group 12 Group 12 includes the LIN, PIA, MEA, LOC and Group 15 and 17

  5. X12 vs. EDIFACT EDIFACT Groups Group 12 Continued... Group 15 includes QTY, DTM and Group 16 Group 16 Group 17 includes QTY, DTM and Group 18 Group 18 includes QTY and DTM

  6. X12 vs. EDIFACT Comparison and Contrast ASC X12 ISA GS ST first message nth message CTT SE GE IEA EDIFACT UNA (delimiter String Advice) UNB UNG UNH first message nth message NO DETAIL OR HL COUNTERS UNT UNE UNZ

  7. X12 vs. EDIFACT Delimiters Component Separator Segment Terminator Data Element Separators • EDIFACT allows the trading partners to either • - Establish a service string: UNA • - Default Service String • Apostrophe ('): segment terminator • Plus sign (+): segment tag and data element separator • Colon (:): component data element separator LIN+1+8+R12555:IN’

  8. X12 vs. EDIFACT Comparison and Contrast The Material Release (830) vs. The Delivery Schedule (Delfor)

  9. X12 vs. EDIFACT ISA vs.. UNB ISA*00**00**01*005289806*01*305678132*980528*0832*U*00401*001*1*T*> UNB+UNOA:1+005289806:01+305678132:01+980528:0832+001++++1++1' EDIFACT uses a ‘1’ for Test and a ‘Blank’ for Production

  10. X12 vs. EDIFACT GS vs.. UNG GS*PS*005289806*350678132*19980528*0832*001*X*004010 UNG+DELFOR+005289806+350678132+19980528:0832+001+UN+D:99A'

  11. MATERIAL RELEASE - COMPARISON ANSI ASC X12 – 830 Transaction Set EDIFACT DELFOR Message ST*830*0001 UNH+0001+DELFOR:D:99A:UN' BGM+241+98147+5' DTM+137:19980528:102’ DTM+158:19980227:102’ DTM+159: 20000118:102’ RFF+ON:98147132019 BFR*05*98147*98147132019* DL*A*19980227*20000118* 19980528 ANSI transaction sets has different Beginning Segments for each transaction EDIFACT has 1 Beginning Segment BGMfor all messages

  12. MATERIAL RELEASE - COMPARISON 4 Segments vs.. 1 Segment ANSI ASC X12 – 830 Transaction Set EDIFACT DELFOR Message N1*ST*JOHN DEERE FACTORY*1*005289806 N2*C/O ACME WAREHOUSE N3*1000 MAIN STREET N4*MOLINE*IL*61265*US NAD+ST+005289806::16++JOHN DEERE FACTORY++ C/O ACME WAREHOUSE+1000 MAIN STREET C/O ACME WAREHOUSE+MOLINE+IL+61265+US’

  13. MATERIAL RELEASE - COMPARISON ANSI ASC X12 – 830 Transaction Set EDIFACT DELFOR Message GIS+36’ LIN+++AR111222:IN’ PIA+1+RC0408:VP+466000BO:CR’ LIN*00001*BP*AR111222* VP*RC0408*CR*466000BO REF*DK*722 LOC+7+722’ QTY+48:150’ DTM+50:19980521:102’ QTY+70:15200’ DTM+51:19970801:102’ RFF+SI:30322’ EDIFACT sends Cumulative Quantities, dates sent and Ship to Ids are at different level.. That we will compare in slide below.

  14. MATERIAL RELEASE - COMPARISON QTY+1:100’ DTM+2:19980618:102’ QTY+1:200’ DTM+2:19980702:102’ ANSI ASC X12 – 830 Transaction Set EDIFACT DELFOR Message SCC+2++D’ FST*150*C*D*19980604 QTY+1:150’ DTM+2:19980604:102’ FST*100*C*D*19980618 SCC+4++D’ QTY+1:100’ DTM+2:19980625:102’ FST*100*D*D*19980625 FST*200*D*D*19980702

  15. MATERIAL RELEASE - COMPARISON ANSI ASC X12 – 830 Transaction Set EDIFACT DELFOR Message QTY+48:150’ DTM+50:19980521:102’ QTY+70:15200’ DTM+51:19970801:102’ SHP*01*150*050*19980521 SHP*02*15200*051*19970801 (This is equivalent to SHP but not at this level) REF*SI*30322 RFF+SI:30322 ' No Line or HL counters used in EDIFACT CTT*1*3350 SE*17*0001 UNT+26+0001’ UNE+1+001’ UNZ+1+001’ GE*1*001 IEA*1*001

  16. MATERIAL RELEASE - COMPARISON THE END

  17. MATERIAL RELEASE - COMPARISON Any Questions Now ?????

More Related