The Humpty Dumpty theory of language

1. The Humpty Dumpty theory of language ‘When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said, in a rather scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean, neither more nor less.’ ‘The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you can make words mean so many different things.’ ‘The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘which is to be master— that’s all.’ Alice was too much puzzled to say anything, so after a minute Humpty Dumpty began again. ‘They’ve a temper, some of them— particularly verbs, they’re the proudest—adjectives you can do anything with, but not verbs—however, I can manage the whole lot of them! Impenetrability! That’s what I say!’ ‘Would you tell me, please,’ said Alice ‘what that means?’ ‘Now you talk like a reasonable child,’ said Humpty Dumpty, looking very much pleased. ‘I meant by “impenetrability” that we’ve had enough of that subject, and it would be just as well if you’d mention what you mean to do next, as I suppose you don’t mean to stop here all the rest of your life.’ ‘That’s a great deal to make one word mean,’ Alice said in a thoughtful tone. Lewis Carroll, Through the Looking Glass and What Alice Found There (Boston, MA: Lothrop, 1898),164

2. He who praises everybody praises nobody. Samuel Johnson James Boswell, The Life of Samuel Johnson, LL.D. (Boston, MA: Carter, Hendee and Co., 1832),vol. 2, 210.

3. Are All Choices Equal? “Asserting the value of homosexual orientation has to be done differently, more empirically, one might say, taking into account the actual nature of homo- and heterosexual experience and life. It can’t just be assumed a priori, on the grounds that anything we choose is right.” Taylor is not taking a position on the value of a homosexual orientation or homosexual love and sex. His point is that if we wish to say that these things do have value then we should try to base this on particular facts about homosexuality, not the principle that anything we choose is right. (That would lead us back to Rawls’ blade counter.) a priori = “from what comes before” (Lat.) In philosophy this phrase is used to describe what can be known independently of experience. Charles Taylor, The Ethics of Authenticity (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991), 38.

4. Are All Cultures Equal? “When the Zulus produce a Tolstoy we will read him…” Saul Bellow (attr.) This remark illustrates a similar argument that can be made at the level of cultures. The point is not to disparage Zulu culture, but to suggest that if we wish to affirm the value of this culture then it will not be enough to do so by claiming that all cultures are necessarily of equal value. If we say that all cultures are automatically equal then we will not be able to make sense of the idea of cultural achievement.