Assessment of Inter-Provincial Inequity with respect to Public Healthcare Expenditure

1. Assessment of Inter-Provincial Inequity with respect to Public Healthcare Expenditure Presentation by the NDoH to the Portfolio Committee

2. Brief the Portfolio Committee on the current situation of inter-provincial inequity with respect to public health care spending. Purpose

3. Present trends in Public Health care expenditure over a 10-year period Present trends in per capita expenditure over a 10-year period (both nominal and real) Present trends including and excluding conditional grants Map a possible way forward Involvement of the Portfolio Committee Outline of Presentation

4. Trends in Public Health Care Spending

5. Trends in Public Health Care Spending (nominal values)

6. Trends in Public Health Care Spending (real values)

7. Trends in Per Capita Spending (nominal value)

8. Trends in Per Capita Spending (real value)

9. Distance from Equity (including Conditional Grants)

10. Distance from Equity (excluding Conditional Grants)

11. Massive inequities exist in the public health system Even if conditional grants are removed, the inequities are not significantly reduced Some provinces have made remarkable progress, however, concern of the pace of change. Western Cape The intentions of the Northern Cape need to be acknowledged. Overall the impact on reducing inequities has been small. Assessment of Equity

12. No comprehensive assessment done yet Limited studies show similar trends Rural and less advantaged areas have less access to resources District Health Expenditure Reviews Help assess the level of inequity and make informed decisions Guidelines developed Provinces are rolling them out Intra-Provincial Inequity

13. Fiscal federalism Global budgets are allocated to provinces and not to sectors specifically Equity needs to be properly assessed in the light of other social spending Obstacles to achieving Equity

14. Development of norms and standards Definition of a basic package of health care – broader than merely primary health care. Next Steps

15. It is recommended that as a way forward the following steps are operationalised: Review of the budgeting system and the use of fiscal federalism to improve inter-provincial equity. Essential steps here include: Conducting an incidence analysis of the financing and benefits health care in South Africa Review of the incorporation funding mechanisms to account for health sector specific problems, e.g. weighting for HIV/AIDS, TB, Malaria Improve the focus on equity of the approach Way Forward

16. Development of a definition of basic health care services Development of both quantitative and qualitative norms and standards Development of minimum funding requirements for health care provision. Way Forward

17. There are a number of areas where the Portfolio Committee on Health can influence the promotion greater equity in health care spending. These include areas where the National Department has little influence over: Working with the portfolio Committee on Finance to understand why greater emphasis is not placed on inter-provincial equity Involvement of Portfolio Committee

18. Together with the Portfolio Committee on Finance and the Select Committees of the NCOP to interrogate Provincial Legislatures and Treasuries in their allocation of revenue to Health departments As the NDoH defines basic Packages of Care and associated norms and standards, it is crucial that the Portfolio Committee on Health assist in obtaining buy-in of this process, to the end that there is commitment to deliver these packages and to fund their appropriate delivery. Assessment of funds earmarked for the implementation of Health Policies are implemented, e.g. HIV/AIDS, Personnel, Capital spending Involvement of the Portfolio Committee