Wyman v newhouse 93 f 2d 313 2d cir 1937 l.jpg
This presentation is the property of its rightful owner.
Sponsored Links
1 / 7

WYMAN v. NEWHOUSE 93 F.2d 313 (2d Cir. 1937) PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 191 Views
  • Uploaded on
  • Presentation posted in: General

WYMAN v. NEWHOUSE 93 F.2d 313 (2d Cir. 1937). Case Brief. WYMAN v. NEWHOUSE. PURPOSE: This is an example of the consequences of improper service of process. WYMAN v. NEWHOUSE. CAUSE OF ACTION: Breach of promise to marry, seduction. . WYMAN v. NEWHOUSE.

Download Presentation

WYMAN v. NEWHOUSE 93 F.2d 313 (2d Cir. 1937)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript


Wyman v newhouse 93 f 2d 313 2d cir 1937 l.jpg

WYMAN v. NEWHOUSE93 F.2d 313 (2d Cir. 1937)

Case Brief

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.

All Rights Reserved.


Wyman v newhouse l.jpg

WYMAN v. NEWHOUSE

  • PURPOSE: This is an example of the consequences of improper service of process.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.

All Rights Reserved.


Wyman v newhouse3 l.jpg

WYMAN v. NEWHOUSE

  • CAUSE OF ACTION: Breach of promise to marry, seduction.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.

All Rights Reserved.


Wyman v newhouse4 l.jpg

WYMAN v. NEWHOUSE

  • FACTS: A paramour (Wyman) implores her boyfriend (Newhouse) with telegrams, letters, and phone calls to come to Miami to meet because she is leaving country to visit her ill mother in Ireland. When the boyfriend arrives at airport in Miami, he is met by a deputy who serves complaint. His New York attorney advises him not to respond to the complaint. A default judgment is entered in Florida, its enforcement in New York is challenged by Newhouse in the U.S. District Court.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.

All Rights Reserved.


Wyman v newhouse5 l.jpg

WYMAN v. NEWHOUSE

  • ISSUE: Whether the service of process was effective when obtained by deception in getting the defendant to enter the jurisdiction.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.

All Rights Reserved.


Wyman v newhouse6 l.jpg

WYMAN v. NEWHOUSE

  • HOLDING: No. Service of process was ineffective, default judgment vacated.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.

All Rights Reserved.


Wyman v newhouse7 l.jpg

WYMAN v. NEWHOUSE

  • REASONING: Newhouse was fraudulently enticed into Florida for the purpose of service of process. Full faith and credit is not applied where there is a lack of jurisdiction.

  • “A judgment recovered in a sister state, through the fraud of the party procuring the appearance of another, is not binding on the latter when an attempt is made to enforce such judgment in another state . . . ” [quote omitted from case in book]

  • Defendant was not required to answer the original action in Florida.

Copyright 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning.

All Rights Reserved.


  • Login