1 / 9

Theme 4 Elementary Analysis

Theme 4 Elementary Analysis. Babbie & Mouton, 2005. The Practice of Social Research. Cape Town: Oxford. Multivariate Analysis. Most soc. Science analysis falls within multivariate analysis (general term not a form of analysis) – examination of several variables simultaneously

lesleyl
Download Presentation

Theme 4 Elementary Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Theme 4Elementary Analysis Babbie & Mouton, 2005. The Practice of Social Research. Cape Town: Oxford

  2. Multivariate Analysis • Most soc. Science analysis falls within multivariate analysis (general term not a form of analysis) – examination of several variables simultaneously • Techniques for conducting multivariate analysis: • Factor analysis, • Smallest-space analysis, • Multiple correlation, • Multiple regression, and • Path analysis • Basic logic of multivariate analysis is by means of contingency tables / cross-tabulations • Understand multivariate analysis by fundamental analytic modes: • Univariate analysis • Bivariate analysis

  3. Univariate Analysis • Examination of distribution of cases on only one variable at a time (Describe units of analysis for inferring to larger population) • The logic is as follows: • Distributions– report all individual cases –listing the attributes for each case under study terms of the variable in question • Central tendency– presenting data in the form of summary averages/measures of central tendency –calculating either the mode, arithmetic mean or median (see figure 15.2 p. 425) • Dispersion– measuring the range & standard deviation–the distance separating the highest from the lowest value • Continuous & discrete variables– e.g age & military rank –nominal & ordinal variable • Detail vs manageability– two goals when reporting data

  4. Subgroup Comparisons • Bivariate & multivariate analyses aimed at explanation • Purpose of subgroup description is comparative • Table-formatting issues: • “Collapsing” response categories – combine/collapse two ends of the range of variation e.g very good & good; very poor & poor • Handling “don’t knows”– analyse with and without as well as reporting on both – so readers can draw their own conclusions

  5. Bivariate & Multivariate Analysis • Contrast to univariate as two variables are involved • Largely descriptive – independently describing subgroups with comparison • Adds relationships amongst the variables themselves • Thus involves describing the variables instead of the unit of analysis • Tables constructed from several variables • Reading a table can be as follows: • Read across if table is percentaged down, or • Read down if table is percentaged across • Multivariate - same as bivariate tables except we now use more tan one independent variable

  6. Theme 4The Elaboration Model Cornel Hart March 2007

  7. The Elaboration Model • Also known as interpretation method, Columbia school or Lazarsfeld method • Aims at elaborating on empirical relationship among variables i.o.t. interpreting that relationship • Provides clearest picture of the logic of causal analysis in research • Understanding the relationship between two variables through controlled simultaneous introduction of additional variables by means of contingency tables

  8. Elaboration Paradigm (Table 16.5) • Technical notations –replication, explanation, interpretation & specification • Know whether the test variable is antecedent (prior in time) to the other two variables or intervening between them • Antecedent – test variable affects both the ‘independent’ & ‘dependent’ variables; are related to each other but no causal link between them (figure 16.2) • Intervening – independent variable affects the intervening test variable which in turn affects the dependent variable (figure 16.1)

  9. Technical Notions • Replication– original relationship has been replicated among different groups with still the same result thus original relationship is genuine & general one • Explanation– spurious relationship – original relationship explained through introduction of test variable • Interpretation– Similar to explanation except for time placement of test variable & implications that follow from that difference • Specification– used regardless of whether the test variable is antecedent or intervening – have specified particular conditions under which original relationship holds • Ex Post Facto Hypothesizing - Developing a hypotheses “predicting” relationships that have already been observed – invalid science • Elaboration model provides logical tools for testing those hypotheses within the same body of data - replication

More Related