1 / 39

Health Impact Assessment and the ASEAN Challenges

Health Impact Assessment and the ASEAN Challenges. Decharut Sukkumnoed Kasetsart University and Healthy Public Policy Foundation, Thailand. Introduction.

lesa
Download Presentation

Health Impact Assessment and the ASEAN Challenges

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Health Impact Assessment and the ASEAN Challenges Decharut SukkumnoedKasetsart University andHealthy Public Policy Foundation, Thailand

  2. Introduction • The importance of inter-sectoral commitment and action, or “All for Health” principle, has been hi-lighted, since the 1st International Conference for Health Promotion (1986). • However, the 5th ICHP found that “high-sounding, general calls to improve social responsibility for health are not sufficient to stimulate action” (2000). • After 1990, globalization has introduced adverse effects and new opportunities for health communities. • In Bangkok Charter 2005, How HIA can address the globalization challenges, through the formulation of healthy public policy and re-oriented globalization with a more healthy human face.

  3. Healthy Public Policy • The capacity of society to screen, analyze, select, develop, nurture, and influence public policies to protect and promote health is needed. • HPP aims to create supportive environmental framework to enable people to lead healthy lives. • The core idea is to “put health on the agenda of policy makers in all sectors and at all levels” and to “make healthier choices the easier choices” for policymaking. • HPP is the bridge for integrating health dimension into upstream development process and empowering people to have more control over their health, lives and destinies.

  4. Health Impact Assessment • A commitment to HPP means the government must assess and measure the health impacts of their policies in a consultative and participatory ways. • HIA=“a combination of procedures, methods, and tools by which a policy, program, project may be judged as to its potential effect on health of the population and the distribution of those effects within the population.” • HIA provides “a set of evidence-based recommendations gears to informing decision-making process”. • The aim of HIA is to “achieve changes in policies and proposals so that they support better health and reduce health inequalities”.

  5. HIA and Health Promotion • HIA provides a mechanism to achieve the engagement of other sectors in health promotion, through the assessment of and the recommendation for inter-sectoral actions. • HIA needs to address health determinants upstream in planning process. • HIA helps identify and protect disadvantage and vulnerable groups in the societies. • HIA can show how healthier policy solutions are also more attractive social investment options. • HIA = the window for health sector to participate more pro-actively and meaningfully in wider public spheres.

  6. Methodological Development • The development of two main approaches; • EIA approach (Project-oriented approach)more bio-medical model of health(bio-physical determinants of health) • HPP approach (Policy-oriented approach) more socio-environmental model of health(wider determinants of health) • HIA method applies a wide variety of tools, such as reviews, epidemiological studies, mapping, etc. • It is still difficult to determine the most appropriate combination of tools for a specific setting. • It is a need for further methodological development, to make it both “universally accessible” and appropriate for “any groups” of HIA practitioners

  7. Underpinning Principlesof HIA • Democracy • Equity • Ethical Use of Evidence • Practicability • Collaboration • Comprehensiveness • Sustainability

  8. Is HIA applied only (or mainly) for project level?

  9. No.It can also use at policy level.

  10. HIA of Thailand’s Energy Policy

  11. Reduction in Greenhouse gas Emission Reduction by 40%

  12. Reduction in Air Pollution (SOx) SOxReduced by50%

  13. Next Step is to calculate theDALYs of each policy options.

  14. Is HIA applied only (or mainly) for the national levels?

  15. No.It can also use at the local level.

  16. Better Urban Zoning ร่างผังฉบับใหม่ (กันยายน 2553)

  17. Field Experiment บึงบัวข้างนิคมฯ “หนองแฟบ”ในตำนาน 1 ป่าชายเลนผืนสุดท้าย

  18. People Design

  19. Policy Options ร่างผังเมืองทางเลือกฯ ร่างผังเมืองฉบับใหม่ (กันยายน 2553) กลายมาเป็นร่างผังเมืองทางเลือกเพื่อสุขภาวะ

  20. Healthy Urban Zoning: Reduction of Potential Air Pollutant Emission (ton/day)

  21. Healthy Urban Zoning:Reducing Water Consumption and Water Discharge (m3/day)

  22. Is HIA applied mainly for the approval of policy or project?

  23. No.It can be used as a social learning process.

  24. HIA Learning Process:Participatory Learning Process • Pesticide Risks- Health Impacts- Local eco-system- Economic impacts- Study Visits- Local Development Plan

  25. HIA Learning Process:Field Survey and Exercises

  26. HIA Learning Process:Study Visits Finding alternativesLearning new practicesComparing impacts Designing the Future

  27. HIA and Policy-making • The early version of HIA assumed a linear process with a direct link between HIA and decision-making process.“without real consideration of the political and administrative frameworks within which is has to operate” • The later version of HIA tended to emphasize decision-making structures and political process. • Several HIA studies can successfully influence policy-making. The keys to success are strong political commitment, participatory processes, and finding effective ways in fitting non-statutory assessment into statutory planning (or policy) framework. • The success of HIA should not necessarily be evaluated as a one-off event, but more as “a continual effects that bring change in organizational thinking about health and subsequent decision-making”.

  28. HIA Institutionalization • Institutionalization, or how to integrate HIA into existing procedures and roles of policy-making, is crucial to create a firm basis for HPP. • Becoming a routine part of policy-making without appropriate design and quality control can make HIA an inefficient process with merely a symbolic function. • HIA institutionalization have taken place in different countries. The best institutionalization strategy depends very much on political, administrative, economic contexts of each country. • To improve and maintain HIA effectiveness in policy system, it is necessary to design and invest in quality control mechanism, adequate provision for external accountability and technical support systems.

  29. Is HIA the only experts’ exercise?

  30. No, we also support and develop community HIA

  31. Community HIA and mining projects

  32. Community HIA and Flood Management

  33. HIA= Social Learning Process • HIA has not been developed as another technical tool but rather as a tool for social learning. • The opportunities for public involvement is the main advantage of HIA as a health promotion tool. • The HIA process can promote the sense of self-esteem and responsibility. • HIA can also work as a conflict resolution mechanism and provide room for marginalized groups to raise societal concerns over their health and destinies. • HIA process enables non-health actors to generate relevant public health knowledge and also re-orient power relationship with and between professional decision-makers.

  34. Can HIA be used for impacts across the border?

  35. Yes. In EU, they applied HIA for common agricultural policy and other EU policies.

  36. Regionalization and Health • Regionalization can stimulate economic growth, reduce the sense of isolation, bring technological advancement, better infrastructure and educational progress and raise concerns on environment and human rights. • Regionalization, just like globalization may cause the difficulties for the government in safeguarding people’s socio-economic conditions, increases the pressures on natural resources and environment, changes lifestyles and social structures, and leads to social and cultural tensions. • Regionalization also affects ability of health sectors in taking care of their populations, through the adjustment of macro-economic policy framework.

  37. Some Emerging Topics for Collaborative HIAs in ASEAN • Climate change adaptation • Flood Management in ASEAN cities • ASEAN economic corridors • Mekong river basin management • Long-term food security • Food standard harmonization • ASEAN Cross-border health services • Healthy generation of ASEAN (youth) • Etc.

  38. HIA & the ASEAN Challenges • HIA provides a fertile ground for nurturing our societal capacities in developing HPP. • At the national level, the appropriateness of its implicit strategies, such as institutionalization and empowering social learning process, in each contexts will determine the ultimate success of HIA. • At the regional level, the number of international policies and mega-project investment should be reconsidered through HIA. • The strategy to link HPP & HIA with ASEAN development goal is necessary to re-orient regional development process. • The strong aspiration of “living healthily together” with supportive academic collaborations is essential for HPP & HIA development in ASEAN countries.

  39. Thank you for your attention and suggestions

More Related