1 / 19

GENDER ISSUES ACADEMIC YEAR 2013-2014

GENDER ISSUES ACADEMIC YEAR 2013-2014. Measuring gender inequalities: the global gender gap report of the WEF ( E.Chiappero-Martinetti ). First report on 2006 National gender gaps and country rankings on: economic , political , education health-based criteria

Download Presentation

GENDER ISSUES ACADEMIC YEAR 2013-2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. GENDER ISSUESACADEMIC YEAR 2013-2014 Measuring gender inequalities: the global gender gap report of the WEF (E.Chiappero-Martinetti)

  2. First report on 2006 • National gender gaps and country rankings on: • economic, • political, • education • health-based criteria • Scope: to create greater awareness among a global audience of the challenges posed by gender gaps and the opportunities created by reducing them.  http://www.weforum.org/issues/global-gender-gap

  3. Features • Three mainfeatures: • Itmeasures gaps ratherthanlevels => GGI isindependent of the level of development • Itcaptures gaps in outcomevariablesratherthan gaps in input variables (achievementinstead of means/resources) => where M & W stand with regard to some fundamentaloutcomevariablesrelated to human rights • Itrankscountriesaccording to gender equalityratherthanwomen’sempowerment => whether M & W gaps declined; itneitherrewardsnorpenalizes gaps

  4. 4 pillars and 14 indexes • Economicparticipation and opportunity (5 var) • Participation gap: 1 var (W/M labour force participationrates) • Remuneration gap: 2 var (ratio of estimatedfemale-to-male earnedincome + W over M ratio of wage for similar work) • Advancement gap 2 var (W/M amonglegislators, senior officials and managers; W/M amongtechnical and professionalworkers) • Educational attainment(4 var) • W/M Literacy; W/M enrolmentatprimary, secondaryattertiarylevel • Politicalempowerment (3 var) • W/M Seats in parliament; W/M atministeriallevel; no. of years with a W head of state or government in the last 50 years over male value • Health and survival: (2 var) • W/M healthy life expectancy • Sex ratio atbirth (converted to W/M ratio)

  5. Index construction Foursteps: • Step #1: data are converted to female/male ratio (ex. 20% of W in ministerial position:; 20/80=0,25) => gaps instead of level • Step #2: data are truncatedat the «equality benchmark»; usually =1 (M=W), exceptionfor sex ratio atbirth (eq.bench.=0,944; normal sex ratio is 1.06 males for everyfemaleborn) and healthy life expectancy set to 1.06 (according to UNDP 87.5/82.5)

  6. Index construction (2) • Step #3: Subindexscores: weightedaveragewithineachsubindex, first normalizing the variables in terms of equalizingtheir standard deviations (sd). They first calculatesd for eachvarand then divide 0,01/sd: thisvalueisusedasweight fo calculate the weightedaverageacrossvar. i.evar with small variability (small sd) gets a largerweightin the subindex. Country with a larger gap will be penalized

  7. Index construction (3) • Step #4: finalscores are calculated. For (almost) allsubindex the highest score is 1 (equality) and the lowestis 0 (inequlality) [butnot for health for which the highestvalueis just close to 1 (=0,9796)]. The final score is the un-weightedaverage of eachsubindex score and itsrangeis 0-1

  8. Global Gender Gap Index (GGI) • Country coverage: 135 countries (over 90% of the population) • Almost 96% of health gap hasbeencovered; • 93% of education; • only 60% of the economic gap • Only 20% of the political gap

  9. Best performers (top 10): (Italyranks 80°) Worstperformers (bottom 10):

  10. Country profile: an example

  11. Country profilefollows

  12. Letusnowchooseseveralcountries to compare and discuss with ref to the global indexaswellaseach sub-index and anyotherrelevant variables

More Related