Comparative Country Experience: Germany Politics of internationalization/normalization
Download
1 / 9

Background: Politics of „ normalization “ of German politics since 1989 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 129 Views
  • Uploaded on

Comparative Country Experience: Germany Politics of internationalization/normalization The case of PGD Susanne Schultz, Gen-ethical Network/Berlin. Background: Politics of „ normalization “ of German politics since 1989

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Background: Politics of „ normalization “ of German politics since 1989' - leon


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

Comparative Country Experience: Germany Politics of internationalization/normalizationThe case of PGDSusanne Schultz, Gen-ethical Network/Berlin

Background:

Politics of „normalization“ of German politicssince 1989

Political traditionline: leftist-feminist-antieugenicposition in favourofabortionrights, againstselectionandeugenics

(Influential in: abolitionof „embryopathicindication“, debate on Bioethicsconvention, parliamentarianinquirycommission on PGD andstemcellresearch 2000+)


Case of pgd law reform
Case of PGD law reform: internationalization/normalization

7 of July of 2011 Federal Parliament (Bundestag) voted for legalization of PGD

Most permissive law proposal approved: on the base of ethics commission and restricted to the detection of „severe conditions“

Before: One year debate after Supreme Court decision in favour of physician who had denounced himself of having applied PGD

Incoherent reinterpretation of the Embryo Protection Law (1991)


The Embryo internationalization/normalizationprotectionlaw (1990)

allowstoproduce not morethan 3 embryos in vitro in onecyclewiththeonlypurposetoimplantthem in thewombofthewomanfromwhomtheoocyteswereextracted.

´Legal reinterpretation:

  • PGD usespluri- not totipotentcells

  • PGD producesmorethan 3 embryos but physiciansarecalculatingthatpartofthem will be „non viable“


Main Lines of debate and shifts since 2000 internationalization/normalization

Debate during milennium change:

Main dichotomy: Status of the embryo as human being versus scientific progress (in the light of stem cell research) + reproductive choice

But also Parliamentarian influence of antieugenic/feminist/disabled people movement arguments


Main lines of arguments 2010/2011 internationalization/normalization:

Conservative embryo protection (with leading figure, chancellor Merkel) and less prominent feminist/antieugenic coalition (Reprokult feminist experts, Gen-ethical network, welfare organizations for disabled people did declarations, but less movement based)

-> more difficult for progressive critique


New lines of arguments based on internationalization and normalization
New lines of arguments based on internationalization and normalization

  • Cross border PGD treatment (Czech republic, Belgium, Spain)

  • Using international statistics about small numbers of PGD treatments against slippery slope argument

  • European Court for Human Rights decision-making – Italian couple against prohibition of PGD („discrimination“ comparing with other IVF services, similar to decision on egg donation in Austria)

  • Normalization of PND as argument for PGD


International normalization homogenizationofdiscourse (comparingitwith UK/US) :

  • Imputingthecriticsthattheyarguewith „designerbabies“ anddecomposingthiscritique

  • Emotional mediapolicieswith individual cases

  • Strong individualisticreproductivechoicediscourse

  • Case bycasedecisionmakinginsteadofpoliciesguidedbyprinciples (against legal German tradition)

    Marginalizedfromdebate:

    questionofembryostorageandresearchasconsequenceofthelaw (whathappenstothe „threerule“)


Conclusion normalization :

Old challenge: hegemonicframe - statusoftheembryo versus progressive pro-scienceposition

New challenges:

  • Tendencytowardsstrongerimpactofcomparisonwithother (Western and permissive) national policies , argumentationwithnormalizationof PGD (in reproductivetourism) and PND, ethicizationascasebycasedecision-making

  • Marginalizationofcoherent legal policiesbased on generalprinciples, marginalizationofdebate on embryoresearch, on implicationsoftechnologies in a broader sense,

  • Critiqueofeugenicsdiscreditedasold-fashionedand not adequateanymore


ad