1 / 31

Target Setting in the Sixth Form

Target Setting in the Sixth Form. Pete Bull, Eileen Chapman Senior School Improvement Advisers School Improvement Service Contact: pbull@cfbt.com Tel: 07818 034504. Aim.

lei
Download Presentation

Target Setting in the Sixth Form

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Target Setting in the Sixth Form Pete Bull, Eileen Chapman Senior School Improvement Advisers School Improvement Service Contact: pbull@cfbt.com Tel: 07818 034504

  2. Aim To assist senior leaders / heads of sixth form in the setting of targets for and tracking the progress of post-16 students.

  3. National Targets 2006 70% achieve L2 by 19 (baseline in 2004 was 67%) 2008 72% achieve L2 by 19 75% increase in completion of young apprenticeships 2011 2% reduction in NEET 2015 90% of 17 yr olds participate in education

  4. What Data? • Post 16 PANDA • Learner Achievement Tracker (LAT) (part of the LSC’s new measures for success) • FFT online • ALIS (A level Information system) • ALPS (A level points system) Two functions: • Recording and reporting what has already been done • Setting targets for future cohorts

  5. Value-added target setting Average Points Score for En, Ma, Sc at KS2 Points score for subject at KS3 KS2-3 KS2-4 Points score for subject at KS4 Average Points Score for En, Ma, Sc at KS3 KS3-4 Average Total Points Score up to 2 years before Post-16 measure (not re-sits) KS4-5 Points score for L3 subject at KS5

  6. Post-16 PANDA • Contextual information about numbers and genders • Attainment Summary - %A-E, APS per entry (all and gender using UCAS) compared with national. Sig+, in line, sig – • New measures of success at L3 – VA score (QCA) compared with national

  7. Attainment summary - %A-E

  8. Attainment summary - APS

  9. Gender analysis

  10. Value Added Score

  11. Learner Achievement Tracker • Value-Added for 16-19 learners will measure achievement in L3 graded qualifications, for example: • GCE A and AS level • AVCE • BTEC National Diploma • Distance Travelled for 16-19 learners will include other approved Qualifications at Levels 1,2 and 3 for example: • NVQ • Foundation and Intermediate GNVQ • GCSE

  12. VA summary chart 0 = national average +30 = one grade better

  13. VA comparison chart A A* C B D

  14. National Chances chart Prior attainment 40-46 points at GCSE (C – B/C)

  15. Update on Post-16 Achievement and Attainment Tables Pilot Overview • 2 Year Pilot - 2005 and 2006 • Long term aim of reporting all Level 3 qualifications and including a value added measure in the Post-16 Tables • Year 1 (2005) – Testing Equivalences between A/AS and other qualifications • Year 2 (2006) – Testing Value Added (more difficult process)

  16. Post-16 Achievement and Attainment Tables Pilot

  17. UCAS Scoring system

  18. QCA Scoring system Size compared with Level 3 Threshold - 2 A levels

  19. QCA Scoring system (cont)

  20. Normal Post-16 AAT 2005 Number of students aged 16-18 287 GCE and VCE resultsNumber entered 128Average point score per student 244.3 (3C)Average point score per examination entry 78.4 (C)Other QualificationsNumber of students entered for an AEA 2005% achieving qualificationNumber of students entered for other Advanced VQ% achieving qualificationNumber of students entered for Intermediate VQ% achieving qualificationNumber of students entered for IB diploma 13% achieving IB diploma 92%

  21. Pilot AAT 2005 Contextual InformationNumber of 16-18 yr olds 287Number of 16-18 yr olds at end of A-level study 128Number of 16-18 yr olds at end of A-level & equiv’t study 141 SCAAT Performance IndicatorsQualifications achieved by students at end of A-level/6th Form studyAverage points per candidateA/AS/Key Skills only (UCAS points) 244.3 (3C)A/AS/Key Skills only (QCA points) 636.4 (3C)A/AS & Equivalences (QCA points) 661.6 (3C+)Average points per A-level equivalentA/AS/Key Skills only (UCAS points) 78.4 (C) (A/AS/Key Skills only (QCA points) 204.2 (C-)A/AS & Equivalences (QCA points) 201.0 (C-)

  22. For 2006 • All L3 qualifications • New QCA scores • APS per student + APS per entry For 2007+ • Trying to get a value-added school measure • Look at Value Added of each student at end of 6th form based on: • Prior attainment • Pupil context – e.g. gender, volume of study, qualification route

  23. AAT vs LAT value-added models

  24. Update on Fischer Family Trust Online • A pilot looking at subject value-added comparisons from KS4 – KS4 (also KS2/3 – KS4) • Data for 2005 year for you to explore • Password: from Performance Information office - 01522 553271 (you need school DFES number e.g. 925XXX) • Website: www.fftlive.org

  25. FFT online – Subject VA summary

  26. FFT online – Subject VA summary

  27. External Forecasting systems:ALIS and ALPS

  28. External forecasting systems: ALIS • A Level Information System (www.cemcentre.org) • Baseline is APS at GCSE (can use a paper test if no scores at GCSE) • Attitudinal questionnaires available – helps teaching and learning and careers • Suggested forecasts for new students – grouped into 4 quartiles based on GCSE APS (Band A: > A/B, Band B: B/C – A/B, Band C: B/C, Band D: <C) • Value-added reports after results

  29. ALIS

  30. External forecasting systems: ALPS • Advanced Level Performance System • Website (www.alps-va.co.uk) • Baseline is GCSE prior attainment. Data sent to Alps for calculation of targets. • Data tables allow a subject to know whether their performance is at the higher, middle, or lower end of achievement when compared with the best achieving providers. • Forecasts provided as minimum target grades. These are derived from the performance of the top achieving colleges. The forecasts are intentionally demanding. • Produces benchmark tables based on value-added:

  31. ALPS and ALIS

More Related