1 / 18

Accountability Reporting The “ Scorecard ”

Presentation to Academic Senate November 1, 2012 Rosaleen Ryan. Accountability Reporting The “ Scorecard ”. The world in which we live… . Progress on intermediate measures of student success Completion outcomes

lea
Download Presentation

Accountability Reporting The “ Scorecard ”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Presentation to Academic Senate • November 1, 2012 • Rosaleen Ryan Accountability ReportingThe “Scorecard”

  2. The world in which we live…

  3. Progress on intermediate measures of student success • Completion outcomes • To the extent possible, implementation of this recommendation will rely on existing ARCC measures Student Success Taskforce recommendation 7.3: Scorecard

  4. Current accountability framework vs. • The upcoming Scorecard • Examples of MPC’s performance Today’s presentation

  5. In 2004, AB 1417  creation of a performance measurement system for the CCCs  ARCC • ARCC has systemwide and collegewide performance indicators Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (ARCC)

  6. Student Progress and Achievement Rate (SPAR) • 30 unit achievement rate • vs. • NEW Student Progress and Achievement Rate (SPAR) • NEW 30 unit achievement rate (“momentum” point) ARCC vs. Scorecard

  7. Table 1.1: Percentage of first-time students who within 6 yrs “progressed” or “achieved.” The 2012 ARCC Report

  8. Table 1.1a: Percentage of first-time students who earned at least 30 Units in a CCC. The 2012 ARCC Report

  9. Persistence (Fall to Fall) • vs. • NEW Persistence (Fall to Spring to Fall – 3 continuous terms) ARCC vs. Scorecard

  10. Table 1.2: Percentage of first-time students who returned to any CCC the subsequent Fall. The 2012 ARCC Report

  11. Collegewide performance indicators include: • SPAR and 30 unit achievement rate • Fall-to-fall persistence • Successful CTE course completion rate • Basic Skills improvement rates Accountability Reporting for the Community Colleges (ARCC)

  12. Statewide metrics • Collegewide metrics: • SPAR • 30 unit achievement rate (“momentum” point) • Fall-to-fall persistence (continuous enrollment) • CTE completion rate (degree/cert or transfer) • Basic Skills progression rates Scorecard

  13. Successful course completion rates for CTE courses • vs. • NEW CTE completion rate (degree/certificate, transfer, transfer prepared) ARCC vs. Scorecard

  14. Table 1.3: Annual Successful Course Completion Rate for Credit Vocational Courses. The 2012 ARCC Report

  15. Basic Skills Improvement rate • vs. • NEW Basic Skills progression rate ARCC vs. Scorecard

  16. Table 1.5: Improvement Rates for Basic Skills Courses The 2012 ARCC Report

  17. Focus on long-term distal outcomes, rather than short-term proximal outcomes • Tracking students over time • No context, no room for unique identity or for flexibility • Data are publicly available • Drilling down in the data • Indicators will be broken out by demographics The changing landscape of accountability reporting…

  18. Questions???

More Related