Spitzer irac akari irc cross calibration
Download
1 / 29

Spitzer-IRAC/Akari-IRC Cross-Calibration - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 66 Views
  • Uploaded on

Spitzer-IRAC/Akari-IRC Cross-Calibration. Jason Surace April 19, 2007. With figures by Ohyama, Wada, and Tanabe.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about ' Spitzer-IRAC/Akari-IRC Cross-Calibration' - lala


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Spitzer irac akari irc cross calibration

Spitzer-IRAC/Akari-IRCCross-Calibration

Jason Surace

April 19, 2007

With figures by Ohyama, Wada, and Tanabe


Our interest in akari formerly astro f formerly iris

It is in the overall interest of IRAC to ensure that the calibration of Akari is consistent with IRAC’s. This will allow direct comparison between datasets on both satellites, and along the way ensure we haven’t made any major errors.

IRC has capabilities Spitzer doesn’t. It has more broadband filters, and spectroscopic capabilities down to 1.5 µm.

Our Interest in Akari (formerly Astro-F, formerly IRIS)


Brief Akari Overview calibration of Akari is consistent with IRAC’s. This will allow direct comparison between datasets on both satellites, and along the way ensure we haven’t made any major errors.

Much like Spitzer:

68 cm telescope, this satellite is not small! 4m long, 960kg!

Imaging and Spectroscopy


Sun-synchronous Earth orbit calibration of Akari is consistent with IRAC’s. This will allow direct comparison between datasets on both satellites, and along the way ensure we haven’t made any major errors.

68cm telescope

3.7m, 960kg

170l He, 1.8 yrs

1.8-160µm

Primarily all-sky survey

Earth-trailing Solar orbit

86cm telescope

4.4m, 950 kg

350l He, 5.5 yrs

3.6-160µm

Primarily pointed observations


IRC and FIS calibration of Akari is consistent with IRAC’s. This will allow direct comparison between datasets on both satellites, and along the way ensure we haven’t made any major errors.

10x10’ imaging

2,3,4,7,9,11,15,18,24,60,160µm

Low-res slit and slitless spectroscopy over entire wavelength range

IRAC, IRS, and MIPS

5x5’ imaging

~4,5,6,8,24,70,160 µm, plus some minimal 16µm

Low and high-res slit spectroscopy over 5-40µm

Low-res spectroscopy 50-100µm


Post-Cryo! calibration of Akari is consistent with IRAC’s. This will allow direct comparison between datasets on both satellites, and along the way ensure we haven’t made any major errors.

Spitzer: IRAC 3.6 and 4.5µm channels will continue working. Passive cooling.

Akari: IRC NIR channel, with 2, 3, 4µm filters plus spectroscopy will continue to work. Passive cooling plus cryo-coolers.


Equivalent of JPL+Goddard calibration of Akari is consistent with IRAC’s. This will allow direct comparison between datasets on both satellites, and along the way ensure we haven’t made any major errors.

Runs all space science missions (I.e. everything).

Development, assembly, operations, research, etc.

250 total people.

Akari looks to be operated by 10-20 people, total.


IRC Spectroscopic Capabilities calibration of Akari is consistent with IRAC’s. This will allow direct comparison between datasets on both satellites, and along the way ensure we haven’t made any major errors.


NIR N2 (1.7-2.7µm) calibration of Akari is consistent with IRAC’s. This will allow direct comparison between datasets on both satellites, and along the way ensure we haven’t made any major errors.

~10 min stack

single1-min observation


NIR (InSb) NP Prism (2-6µm) calibration of Akari is consistent with IRAC’s. This will allow direct comparison between datasets on both satellites, and along the way ensure we haven’t made any major errors.


MIR-L Si:As LG2 Grism (17-25µm) calibration of Akari is consistent with IRAC’s. This will allow direct comparison between datasets on both satellites, and along the way ensure we haven’t made any major errors.


Akari Calibrator Stars calibration of Akari is consistent with IRAC’s. This will allow direct comparison between datasets on both satellites, and along the way ensure we haven’t made any major errors.

Akari calibration methodology identical to IRAC’s. Martin Cohen generates predicted fluxes based on instrument throughput and templates. Broad-band imaging and spectroscopy both calibrated in this fashion. Almost all Akari calibrators already observed by IRAC. Mostly A & K-stars. Deliberate overlap with IRAC to extent allowed by pointing constraints.


Some Difficulties calibration of Akari is consistent with IRAC’s. This will allow direct comparison between datasets on both satellites, and along the way ensure we haven’t made any major errors.

Difficult to use the slits due to pointing issues.

Advantages to using slitless (easier to handle slit loss), but there are confusion problems at short wavelengths.

Also, wavelength calibration not fixed and leads to problems near spectrum ends.


Near-IR Prism calibration of Akari is consistent with IRAC’s. This will allow direct comparison between datasets on both satellites, and along the way ensure we haven’t made any major errors.

2MASS 1757132

KF06T2 - K-star

Note - calibration is set by this object at short end.

Black is Cohen template, blue is IRC data.


Near-IR Grism calibration of Akari is consistent with IRAC’s. This will allow direct comparison between datasets on both satellites, and along the way ensure we haven’t made any major errors.

BP +66 1073 - K-star

HD 42525

A-star

(calibrator)

KF09T1

K-star


Np k vs a in mjy um 2 unit
<NP> calibration of Akari is consistent with IRAC’s. This will allow direct comparison between datasets on both satellites, and along the way ensure we haven’t made any major errors.K vs. A(in mJy*um^2 unit)

K

A

2MASS

1757132

KF06T2

<base>


Ng k vs a in mjy um 2 unit
<NG> calibration of Akari is consistent with IRAC’s. This will allow direct comparison between datasets on both satellites, and along the way ensure we haven’t made any major errors.K vs. A(in mJy*um^2 unit)

K

A

<base>


Unfortunately, this is confused by the fact that we don’t have the raw spectra, only the flux-calibrated ones which already have the standard star response in them.

But you can see the absorption trough in channel 2 easily!


Sg1 k vs a in mjy um 2 unit
<SG1> have the raw spectra, only the flux-calibrated ones which already have the standard star response in them.K vs. A (in mJy*um^2 unit)

K

A

<base>


Mid-IR Short Grism 1 have the raw spectra, only the flux-calibrated ones which already have the standard star response in them.

BP +66 1073

K-star

HD 42525

A-star

(calibrator)

NPM 1p67 536

K-star


Mid-IR Short Grism 2 have the raw spectra, only the flux-calibrated ones which already have the standard star response in them.

BP +66 1073

K-star

HD 42525

A-star

(calibrator)


Are we learning anything

For at least some K-stars, Martin’s templates have too deep troughs. But they work well for other stars. Inadequacy of optical spectral typing?

No obvious surprise features.

Still need to get raw data. Getting any data has been tricky.

Are We Learning Anything?


Akari calibration locations

Akari CVZ within 0.6 degrees of ecliptic pole (similar to WISE), vs. 4-5 for Spitzer.

All Akari cal stars located within their northern and southern CVZ.

Deep survey at ecliptic caps. Ideal for general cross-cal with IRAC.

IRAC dark field outside the Akari CVZ, although it is being observed in a fashion as part of a mission project (Egami, PI).

Observing Akari cal field as an IRAC cal activity.

Akari Calibration Locations


Deep component
“Deep” Component WISE), vs. 4-5 for Spitzer.

Central 5x5’

Depth is 28x100 seconds

5-sigma = 0.6, 1.2, 7.5, and 9 µjy at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, and 8 µm.

Confusion-limited at 3.6 and 4.5µm.

2 hours to execute.


Shallow component
“Shallow” Component WISE), vs. 4-5 for Spitzer.

Coverage of a 10x10’ area with all 4 arrays.

8x30 seconds = 2x SWIRE integration time

5-sigma = 2.5, 4.2, 28, and 32µJy at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8, 8 µm.

High Dynamic Range Mode

50 minutes to execute


Akari NEP Cal Field Observed by IRAC WISE), vs. 4-5 for Spitzer.

Ch.1

Ch.4

Ch.1 Entire Field, all exposures


IRAC vs. IRC Broadband Photometry WISE), vs. 4-5 for Spitzer.


Early results from cross cal field encouraging

Computed the expected slopes from Martin’s model calculations for specific stars.

IRC/IRAC numbers match to within 5%, the limit I could measure them to.

Somewhat circular, since Akari also calibrated to Cohen templates.

Indicates no significant issues with system throughput measurements.

Indicates that point source measurement and calibration methodology holds and agrees between missions.

Early Results from Cross-Cal Field Encouraging


ad