1 / 16

Can cross-cultural training make matters worse?

SIETAR Europa Congress 2007. Can cross-cultural training make matters worse?. Lessons to be learnt from an empirical study of expatriate EFL teachers in Taiwan Wei Ju Liao Robert Johnson University of Bedfordshire. Background Cross-cultural adjustment Classroom management issues

kylar
Download Presentation

Can cross-cultural training make matters worse?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SIETAR Europa Congress 2007 Can cross-cultural training make matters worse? Lessons to be learnt from an empirical study of expatriate EFL teachers in Taiwan Wei Ju Liao Robert Johnson University of Bedfordshire

  2. Background Cross-cultural adjustment Classroom management issues Research findings Possible explanations ‘Culture shock’ training Commonly used approaches and tools Problems and pitfalls Essentialism and the ‘small culture’ paradigm Recommendations Outline

  3. Background • Expatriate English teachers in Taiwan • Methodology • Hypothesis: Expatriate English teachers’ previous cross-cultural training is positively related to their adjustment: • in the general environment • in social interaction with host country nationals • in the workplace

  4. Cross-cultural adjustment • What is cross-cultural adjustment? • Is there an effective model for researching cross-cultural adjustment?

  5. The framework of international adjustment Black, Mendenhall & Oddou (1991)

  6. Reported conflicts between East and West in the classroom Based on Cortazzi & Jin, 1996; Li, 1998, 1999; Maley, 1986; Miklitz, 1996.

  7. Research findings • Expected correlation groups • Teachers experiencing culture shock • Cross-cultural training matched with ‘homesick’, ‘talking about myself with others’ and Taiwanese students’ lack of independence • Unexpected correlation groups • Language ability • Levels of culture-shock • Influence of students’ parents

  8. Possible explanations • Misleading responses, either due to particular situation or faults in the research design. • Taiwan makes foreign expatriates go crazy. • The training they received may have been badly designed, clumsily delivered or pitched at the wrong level. • The tone of the training may have been too negative leading trainees to expect to have difficulties – a self-fulfilling prophecy.

  9. ‘Culture shock’ training • What is it? • Time and resources • Participation • Delivery and quality control • Content

  10. Facts about the place ‘Facts’ about the people Dos and don’ts Exploring stereotypes The iceberg The U-curve and the stages of adaptation Jolt activities, simulations and role play Cultural dimensions Conventional Innovative Commonly used approaches and tools

  11. Problems and pitfalls • Do some of these activities help to create an impression of ‘polar opposites’ in the mind of the trainee? • Is there too much of an emphasis on the negative, stressful aspects of crossing cultures? • If this is the case, can it become a self-fulfilling prophecy? • Are we providing trainees with a useful toolkit, a set of strategies or something else?

  12. Essentialism and dualism (Holliday, Hyde and Kullman, 2004)

  13. The ‘small culture’ paradigm • ‘Small culture’ vs ‘large culture’ • The slippery slope of Culturism: reductionism, otherisation, cultural fundamentalism • Small culture is: • Any social grouping from a neighbourhood to a work group. • A dynamic, ongoing group process which operates in changing circumstances to enable group members to make sense of and operate meaningfully within those circumstances. (Holliday, 1999)

  14. Recommendations • Institutional: training is not ‘the icing on the cake’ • Personal: trainers must engage in pedagogical reflection and professional development • Professional: international standards for cross-cultural training? • Design: more effort needed in planning stage; more consideration of pedagogical principles • Content: dynamic process not fixed product • Evaluation: a measure of effectiveness or a marketing tool?

  15. Questions to consider • What do you think of these research findings? • In your experience, does cross-cultural training overemphasize the stressful aspects of crossing cultures? • What can trainers do to avoid this kind of negative effect?

  16. Thank you very much • Wei Ju Liao E-mail: weiju.liao@beds.co.uk • Robert Johnson E-mail: rpk_johnson@yahoo.co.uk

More Related