1 / 13

Marielle Hart Head of EU policy, Stop AIDS Alliance

Marielle Hart Head of EU policy, Stop AIDS Alliance. The EU Position for the MDG Review Summit Challenges and opportunities. Marielle Hart Action for Global Health. The EU Position for the MDG Review Summit.

kuri
Download Presentation

Marielle Hart Head of EU policy, Stop AIDS Alliance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Marielle Hart Head of EU policy, Stop AIDS Alliance

  2. The EU Position for the MDG Review Summit Challenges and opportunities Marielle Hart Action for Global Health www.actionforglobalhealth.eu

  3. The EU Position for the MDG Review Summit • The negotiated common EU position adopted by Foreign Affairs and Development Ministers and Heads of State • Will be used as the basis for EU representation at the Summit and for EU MS, however they can make their own bilateral commitments too www.actionforglobalhealth.eu

  4. Where does it result from? • Adoption of the EC “April Package” Twelve point Action Plan • Adoption of thematic communications (health, gender, education, food security) • Adoption of Council Conclusions by Foreign Affairs Ministers • Adoption of European Council Conclusions www.actionforglobalhealth.eu

  5. Process • European Commission proposing (annual April packages) • Consultations with Member States, UN, civil society • European Parliament advising (Resolution) • Council negotiations and adoption Council Conclusions www.actionforglobalhealth.eu

  6. EU Position: key issues • Recognition of interlinkages between MDGs • Strong focus on responsibility partner countries • Rights based approach • Recognition of democratic governance and meaningful involvement www.actionforglobalhealth.eu

  7. Special attention to countries most off track – list of priority countries • Reaffirmation of ODA commitments and recognition of innovative financing – ODA on agenda of European Council annually for the first time • Aid effectiveness – mutual accountability and transparency www.actionforglobalhealth.eu

  8. In addition.. • Strong promotion of right to health • Support for social protection mechanisms and removal of user fees • Support for increased leadership of WHO • IHP acknowledged as the preferred framework www.actionforglobalhealth.eu

  9. But… • Too many calls but no concrete action proposed • Unclear how the EU will support social protection, human rights and interlinkages between MDGs • What about inequalities within countries? • Innovative financing for development? www.actionforglobalhealth.eu

  10. No reference to national ODA legislations (UK and Belgium) or binding national yearly timetables • No reference to the EU Agenda for Action on the MDGs, adopted in 2008 • Lack of emphasis on managing for results in aid effectiveness agenda www.actionforglobalhealth.eu

  11. Next steps • Member State bilateral positions and commitments • EU MDG action plan – post MDG Summit • 700 mln euro proposal European Commission • EU U.S Dialogue on the MDGs www.actionforglobalhealth.eu

  12. Implications for MDG Review Summit • Health as a key priority • Interlinkages between MDGs • Rights approach • No concrete actions • No ODA action plans or binding time tables • Managing for results www.actionforglobalhealth.eu

  13. Thank you! www.actionforglobalhealth.eu

More Related