1.03k likes | 1.17k Views
E N D
1. Prepared by The Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense Civilian Personnel PolicyFebruary 13, 2008For additional information, please contact Kay.Godette@osd.mil
2.
2
3.
3 Distribution of SES Ratings (2005-2007)DoD-Wide
4.
4 SES Performance Ratings(2005-2007)By Component
5.
5 SES Average Basic Pay 2005-2007 DoD-Wide
6.
6 SES Average Basic Pay (2007) DoD-Wide
7.
7 SES Average Pay Adjustment and Average Bonus (2005-2007) DoD-Wide
8.
8 SES Average Pay Adjustment and Average Bonus (2007) (By Rating Level)DoD-Wide
9.
9 SES Average Basic Pay Adjustment (2007) DoD-Wide
10.
10 SES Average Bonus (2007) DoD-Wide
11.
11 SES Distribution of Shares (2005-2007) DoD-Wide
12.
12 Summary of Key Points Distribution of performance ratings across the rating levels has been consistent over 3-year period
Majority of Ratings are at Level 4 – 54%
Fewest percentage of Ratings at Level 3 - 14%
Bonus awards are considered part of total compensation. 83% of executives receive a bonus award.
1.12 % (14) of executives are paid at $172,200 (EX II cap)
7 – Air Force; 4- Army; 2 – OSD; 1-DFAS
36. 26% (442) paid >Ex III = EX II ($158,501 - $172,200)
Increase from 29% (348) in 2005
13. Back Up Slides - DoD-Wide
14.
14 Percent of SES Basic Pay (2007) Within Pay Ranges by DoD-Wide
15.
15 Number of Executives with SES Basic Pay Within Pay Ranges - DoD-Wide
16.
16 Percent SES Pay Adjustments Within Pay Ranges (2007) DoD-Wide
17.
17 Number of SES Basic Pay Adjustments Within Ranges - DoD-Wide
18.
18 Percent SES Bonuses (2007) Within Pay Ranges DoD-Wide
19.
19 Number of SES Performance Bonuses Within Pay Ranges - DoD-Wide
20.
20 Percentage of SES Total Aggregate Pay(2007) - DoD-Wide
21.
21 Number of SES Total Aggregate Pay Within Pay Ranges (2007) DoD-Wide
22. Back Up Slides Cont. – DoD Components and Defense Agencies
23. AIR FORCE
24.
24 Distribution of SES Ratings (2005-2007)AIR FORCE In 2005, 16 (10%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In 2006, 5 (1%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In 2007, 14 (8%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In Tier 1, 2 (or 14%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In Tier 2, 2 (or 4%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In Tier 3, 10 (or 9%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In 2005, 16 (10%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In 2006, 5 (1%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In 2007, 14 (8%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In Tier 1, 2 (or 14%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In Tier 2, 2 (or 4%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In Tier 3, 10 (or 9%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
25.
25 Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award 2005-2007 AIR FORCE(Dollars)
26.
26 Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award 2005-2007 AIR FORCE(Percent)
27.
27 SES Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award AIR FORCE (Dollars by Rating Level)
28.
28
29.
29
30. ARMY
31.
31 Distribution of SES Ratings (2005-2007)ARMY In 2005, 11 (4%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In 2006, 7 (3%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In 2007, 9 (3%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In Tier 2, 1 (or 2%) SES leader was not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In Tier 3, 8 (or 5%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In 2005, 11 (4%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In 2006, 7 (3%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In 2007, 9 (3%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In Tier 2, 1 (or 2%) SES leader was not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In Tier 3, 8 (or 5%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
32.
32 Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award 2005-2007 ARMY(Dollars)
33.
33 Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award 2005-2007 ARMY(Percent)
34.
34 SES Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award ARMY (Dollars by Rating Level)
35.
35
36.
36
37. NAVY
38.
38 Distribution of SES Ratings (2005-2007)NAVY In 2005, 1 (0.3%) SES leader was not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In 2006, 11 (3%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal
In 2007, 13 (4%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal
In Tier 2, 4 (or 3%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In Tier 3, 7 (or 6%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
* 12 records were excluded from the overall analysis since they did not have a tier identifier.
In 2005, 1 (0.3%) SES leader was not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In 2006, 11 (3%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal
In 2007, 13 (4%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal
In Tier 2, 4 (or 3%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In Tier 3, 7 (or 6%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
* 12 records were excluded from the overall analysis since they did not have a tier identifier.
39.
39 Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award 2005-2007 NAVY(Dollars)
40.
40 Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award 2005-2007 NAVY(Percent)
41.
41 SES Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award NAVY (Dollars by Rating Level)
42.
42
43.
43
44. DCAA
45.
45 Distribution of SES Ratings (2005-2007)DCAA
46.
46 Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award 2005-2007 DCAA(Dollars)
47.
47 Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award 2005-2007 DCAA(Percent)
48.
48 SES Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award DCAA (Dollars by Rating Level)
49.
49
50.
50
51. DFAS
52.
52 Distribution of SES Ratings (2005-2007)DFAS
53.
53 Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award 2005-2007 DFAS(Dollars and Percent)
54.
54 SES Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award DFAS (Dollars by Rating Level)
55.
55
56.
56
57. DISA
58.
58 Distribution of SES Ratings (2005-2007)DISA 1 person does not have a Tier designation.1 person does not have a Tier designation.
59.
59 Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award 2005-2007 DISA(Dollars)
60.
60 Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award 2005-2007 DISA(Percent)
61.
61 SES Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award DISA (Dollars by Rating Level)
62.
62
63.
63
64. DLA
65.
65 Distribution of SES Ratings (2005-2007)DLA
66.
66 Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award 2005-2007 DLA(Dollars and Percent)
67.
67 SES Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award DLA (Dollars by Rating Level)
68.
68
69.
69
70. DTRA
71.
71 Distribution of SES Ratings (2005-2007)DTRA In 2007, 2 (18%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In Tier 2, 2 of the SES leaders (or 40%) were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In 2007, 2 (18%) SES leaders were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
In Tier 2, 2 of the SES leaders (or 40%) were not rated, as they were on board for less than 90 days before the appraisal.
72.
72 Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award 2005-2007 DTRA(Dollars)
73.
73 Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award 2005-2007 DTRA(Percent)
74.
74 SES Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award DTRA(Dollars by Rating Level)
75.
75
76.
76
77. MDA
78.
78 Distribution of SES Ratings (2005-2007)MDA
79.
79 Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award 2005-2007 MDA(Dollars)
80.
80 Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award 2005-2007 MDA(Percent)
81.
81 SES Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award MDA (Dollars by Rating Level)
82.
82
83.
83
84. DoDOIG
85.
85 Distribution of SES Ratings (2005-2007)DoDOIG
86.
86 Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award 2005-2007 DoDOIG(Dollars and Percent)
87.
87 SES Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award DoDOIG (Dollars by Rating Level)
88.
88
89.
89
90. OUSDI
91.
91 Distribution of SES Ratings (2005-2007)OUSDI
92.
92 Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award 2005-2007 OUSDI(Dollars and Percent)
93.
93 SES Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award OUSDI (Dollars by Rating Level)
94.
94
95.
95
96. OSD
97.
97 Distribution of SES Ratings (2005-2007)OSD 17 identified as having no rating.17 identified as having no rating.
98.
98 Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award 2005-2007 OSD(Dollars) 17 not identified in a Tier. Skews the data.17 not identified in a Tier. Skews the data.
99.
99 Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award 2005-2007 OSD(Dollars and Percent) 17 have no Tier identification. Skews the data.17 have no Tier identification. Skews the data.
100.
100 SES Average Performance Pay Adjustment and Average Performance Bonus Award OSD (Dollars by Rating Level) 17 not rated, therefore no adjustments/bonuses.17 not rated, therefore no adjustments/bonuses.
101.
101
102.
102
103.
103