1 / 10

Conformance Simulation Relation (

Conformance Simulation Relation (. ) Let. and. be two automata over the same alphabet. simulates. (. ) if there exists a simulation relation. such that. implies that. Note that. simulates. but these are not equivalent notions. If may be easier to

koren
Download Presentation

Conformance Simulation Relation (

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Conformance Simulation Relation ( )Let and be two automata over the same alphabet simulates ( ) if there exists a simulation relation such that implies that Note that simulates but these are not equivalent notions. If may be easier to find a simulation relation than to prove language containment.

  2. Language Containment ( ) To show that ) we typically show that (i.e. This requires complementing which may be hard if is non-deterministic (subset construction). So simulation may be easier to check. Equivalence ( ):

  3. O1 F I1 most general U2 U1 O2 X I2 Topologies

  4. F F I1 I1 one-way cascade two-way cascade U2 U1 U1 O2 O2 X X We can also switch X and F

  5. O1 F F I1 Engineering Change U2 U2 U1 U1 O2 rectification X X I2

  6. Controller F U2 U1=O1 X I2

  7. Solving a language equation Solve where and In particular, find the largest solution X (most general solution). Theorem A: Let A and C be languages over alphabets and respectively. For the equation, the most general solution is Theorem B: Let A and C be languages over alphabets and respectively. For the equation, the most general solution is .

  8. Proof: We prove Theorem A. Let . Then means that Thus is the largest solution of The proof of Theorem B is similar.

  9. i/u s s’ s’’ i u s s’ Mapping Parallel into Synchronous Suppose F is a FSM on inputs i,v and outputs u,o and S is an FSM on inputs i and outputs o. Transitions are one of the forms (s i/u s’) (s i/o s’) (s v/u s’) or (s v/o s’). For S, its transitions are of the type (q i/o q’). For each, we convert into automata by creating new intermediate states between inputs and outputs. Thus a transition (s i/u s’) becomes two transitions (s i s’’) (s’’ u s’). Similarly for the others. For S a transition of the type (q i/o q’) becomes (q i q’’) (q’’ o q’).

  10. Now for each s’’ we add a self loop labeled by s’’ -u i o -u s s’ To expand , for each original state, we add a self loop labeled with –u. denoting any symbol in the alphabet u i/o s s’ . With these conversions, we can do synchronous composition and get the equivalent expanded result of parallel composition Thus we need to implement only one type of compositional method – synchronous, and simply have mapping of each machine into its extended machine to compose in parallel. Finally, we can take the solution and map it back into an FSM.

More Related