1 / 18

Barriers to Aquatic Organism Movement in the LCB

Barriers to Aquatic Organism Movement in the LCB. Kyle Bradford Ethan McElwain Bradley Stewart. Problem Statement. Barriers influence populations of aquatic organisms by restricting or altering their movement through the Lake Champlain Basin. Purpose Statement.

kirti
Download Presentation

Barriers to Aquatic Organism Movement in the LCB

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Barriers to Aquatic Organism Movement in the LCB Kyle Bradford Ethan McElwain Bradley Stewart

  2. Problem Statement • Barriers influence populations of aquatic organisms by restricting or altering their movement through the Lake Champlain Basin.

  3. Purpose Statement • Our goal is to determine the effect of barriers to movement of aquatic organisms on the varied habitats represented in the LCB, and in doing so, determine and justify impact filter scores which will be used in the Lake Champlain Regional Relative Eco-Risk Assessment Model.  

  4. Barrier Subcategories • Dams • Roads • Culverts

  5. Dams • Wetlands • Dams affect hydrology • Altered flood regime • Siltation • Open Water • Dams affecting migratory fish • Imperial Dam • Salmon • Swanton Dam • Lake Sturgeon • Walleye

  6. Dams Cont. • Winooski One Dam • Barrier to salmon and steelhead rainbow trout • In 1993 fish passage facility built

  7. Roads

  8. Roads Cont. • Physical barriers to slow moving animals • Open space leads to vulnerability • Attract certain species • Increased downstream sedimentation • Scale

  9. Culverts • Used to allow water to pass underneath roads, railways, or embankments. • Raised up disrupts stream connectivity • Gap is created where water falls • Aquatic organisms cannot jump up into culvert • Restricts movement to downstream only • Gap from raised culverts not the only problem • Too long, narrow, or steep

  10. Raised vs. “Natural” Culvert

  11. Culverts cont. • Aquatic organisms cannot migrate upstream to spawn or reach food sources • Diminishing species • Less rich species diversity • Less than 2% of 465 culverts assessed in VT classified as “completely passible” • Brook trout, salmon, mussels, salamander species, minnows, suckers, smelt, and others (Bates & Kirn 2009)

  12. Impact Link Matrix

  13. Impact Importance Matrix

  14. Recommendations/Conclusions • Further study to determine the magnitude of effects posed by the barriers within the basin. • Swanton Dam and Imperial Dam priority for removal. • Increase signage on roads. • “Smarter” design of new dams, roads, and culverts.

  15. Image Sources in Order of Occurrence • http://www.vtfishandwildlife.com/calendaritems/Swanton_Dam.pdf • http://www.waymarking.com/waymarks/WM1GTE_Mill_Pond_Dam__Quechee_VT • http://www.indiana.edu/~inbsarc// • http://www.mychamplain.net/forum/winooski-one-fish-lift-started-operation-september-15-2010 • http://www.wildlifeandroads.org/decisionguide/2_1_1.cfm • http://jeffircink.blogspot.com/2007/06/news-bulletin-another-turtle-saved.htmll • http://www.cogulus.com/blog/archives/r/Red-Spotted-Newt-294.phpp • http://www.aaroads.com/blog/category/places/north-america/united-states/vermont/ • http://www.confenv.com/projectsCaseStudiesJapanese.html

  16. Questions

More Related