Political system of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Political systems in South-Eastern Europe POL 482 Věra St ojarová. Ethnic composition of BiH. 44 % Bosniaks (Muslims) 31 % Serbs 17 % Croats. 31st July 1990.
Political systems in South-Eastern Europe
44 % Bosniaks (Muslims)
31 % Serbs
17 % Croats
BiH was declared as sovereign and democratic state in order to pursue the confederation model for Yugoslavia
The parliament declared the indivisibility of the land
The qualified majority of voters in referenda needed for change of the borders
Declaration of independence
Referendum about the independence – 63,4 % voters voted for
Serbs boycotted the referendum
Serbs and Croats endeavoured the partition of BiH
Serbs constituted the Serbian Republic (Republika srpska)
Croats declared their state as well – Herzeg Bosna
The latent conflict escalated in a war (1992) which lasted up to 1995
Negotiated in Dayton, signed in Paris 14th December 1995, signed by Milošević, Tudjman and Izetbegović, The Constitution of BiH was included in Annex IV. Of the Dayton Peace Agreement
the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (51 %) and the Republic of Srpska (49 %). All citizens of either Entity are thereby citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
The Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina shall consist of three Members: one Bosniac and one Croat, each directly elected from the territory of the Federation, and one Serb directly elected from the territory of the Republic of Srpska.
(a) Conducting the foreign policy of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
(b) Appointing ambassadors and other international representatives of Bosnia and Herzegovina, no more than two-thirds of whom may be selected from the territory of the Federation.
(c) Representing Bosnia and Herzegovina in international and European organizations and institutions and seeking membership in such organizations and institutions of which Bosnia and Herzegovina is not a member.
(d) Negotiating, denouncing, and, with the consent of the Parliamentary Assembly, ratifying treaties of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
(e) Executing decisions of the Parliamentary Assembly.
(f) Proposing, upon the recommendation of the Council of Ministers, an annual budget to the Parliamentary Assembly.
(g) Reporting as requested, but not less than annually, to the Parliamentary Assembly on expenditures by the Presidency.
(h) Coordinating as necessary with international and nongovernmental organizations in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
(i) Performing such other functions as may be necessary to carry out its duties, as may be assigned to it by the Parliamentary Assembly, or as may be agreed by the Entities.
All refugees and displaced persons have the right freely to return to their homes of origin. They shall have the right to have restored to them property of which they were deprived in the course of hostilities since 1991 and to be compensated for any property that cannot be restored to them. The early return of refugees and displaced persons is an important objective of the settlement of the conflict in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The Parties confirm that they will accept the return of such persons who have left their territory, including those who have been accorded temporary protection by third countries.
The High Representative is the final authority in theater regarding interpretation of this Agreement on the civilian implementation of the peace settlement.
Miroslav Lajčák since July 2007
Christian Schwarz-Schilling31 January 2006 – July 2007
Paddy Ashdown27 May 2002 - 31 January 2006
Wolfgang PetritschAugust 1999 - 27 May 2002
Carlos WestendorpJune 1997 - July 1999
Carl BildtDecember 1995 - June 1997
The conflicts have been quite frequent:
5.5.1999 was dismissed president of Republic of SrpskaNicola Poplasen (extreme Serbian nationalist) by Carlos Westendorp
AFter the dismissal of Poplasen, the vicepresident Mirko Sarović refused to accept his presidential post and the presidency was left vacant.
Next tensions appeared, when the internationals recognized the status of Brčko as independent districts, while the RS wanted to include Brčko within RS. According to the decision of IC, Brčko shall be multiethnic district, which shall not belong to any entiny.
In 2001 another conflict – Ante Jelavić was dismissed by OHR after he had declared his own Croatian government.
All elections in BiH were dominated by the parties, which were at the break of the war. The international community was pushing to build non-nationalistic coalistion after the elections 2000 – the Alliance for Change was composed of 10 noncoherent political parties and it was clear from the beginning that it will fail. The noncoherence and inability of this coalition led to the victory of nationalistic parties in 2002.
The Alliance for change was accused of insufficent support of Bosniaks or better to say of the support of Croats and Serbs. Three incidents caused this perception:
Case of Algerian Group – the government complied with the US demands to give into USA 6 inhabitants of BiH of Algerian origin, who were suspected of the attack on US ambassy in Sarajevo.
Leader of SDP Zlatko Lagumdzija was having a speech at the demonstration of the bosniaks war veterans. The protestation ended in the riots and the Lagumdzija likened them to the serbian rioters in Banja Luka in 2001, which were protesting against the building of a new mosque. Lagumdzija was presented as a traitor of Bosniaks.
April 2002 – 5 politicians of SDA were arrested while being suspected for the organisation of the iran training camp for terrorists in Mt. Pogorelica in 1996. They were released on a bail right before the elections and therefore could have claimed to be martyrs and the victims of the 2000 government.
The Constitutional court declared already in 2000 the invalidity of certain articles in the Constitution of the Republic of Srpska: The preambule of the Constitution of RS stated:
„The RS is a state of Serbian nation“
„Taking the natural and democratic right, will and determination of the Serb people from Republika Srpska into account to link its State completely and tightly with other States of the Serb people“.
The Constitutional Court decided, that its clear evidence, that RS wants to secede and integrate with Serbia and that RS has to change these articles, which would lead in effect into building of multiethnic BiH
Serbia Decision of the Constitutional court, which led to Sarajevo agreement:
Republic of Srpska
Serbia Monte Negro
Serbia: the plain tricolour as the national flag, the tricolour with coat of arms as the state flag
The flag with Decision of the Constitutional court, which led to Sarajevo agreement:4 S is often used, but unofficially.
Само слога Србина спашава
in lat. Samo sloga Srbina spašava
(Only Unity can save the Serbs)"
The Sarajevo agreement stated the principles, which shall be ammended to all the constitutions. The Sarajevo agreement unprecedently modified the Dayton Peace Agreement:
The Article 4: The national representation in all the institutions must reflect the proportion of the population according to the census from 1991.
This article is unrealistic and is ignored by all sides.
House of nations – 15 MPs, 5 from each entity, delegates elected by the parliaments of RS and FBiH
House of representatives: 42 MPs, 2/3 (28) elected directly in FBiH, 1/3 (14) in RS
Both chambers elect their common presidency, system of rotation.
House of representatives – 14 political parties
Government composed of SDA, HDZ,SDS,PDP, SBiH
House of representatives of FBiH: SDA and HDZ won (32 resp. 16 mandates)
FBiH Government composed of SDA,HDZ,SBiH
National assembly of RS: SDS 26,SNSD 19, SDA 6, SBiH 4, SRS 4, SDP 3, SPRS 3, DNS 3, other 14 parties 1 mandate each.
RS Government : SDS, SDA, PDP
administered for the very first time by the domestic authorities with foreign observation.
The political landscape in BiH remains largely divided along ethnic lines,
Key contests occurred mainly among political parties that competed with one another in their own ethnic communities.
In contrast, some parties, including the Social Democratic Party (SDP), tried to present a more multi-ethnic profile.
Bosnia and Herzegovina introduced the direct election of mayors at regional and municipal elections held in October 2004.
Name of the party, number of votes, mandates, direct mandates, compensatory mandates:
SDA-STRANKA DEMOKRATSKE AKCIJE 218.365 25,45%28 23 5
STRANKA ZA BOSNU I HERCEGOVINU 190.148 22,16 %24 19 5
SDP - SOCIJALDEMOKRATSKA PARTIJA BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE - SOCIJALDEMOKRATI BIH 130.204 15,17 %17 13 4
HDZ-HRVATSKA KOALICIJA-HNZ,HSP 64.906 7,56 %8 7 1
HRVATSKO ZAJEDNIŠTVO (HDZ 1990 HZ-HSS-HKDU-HDU-DEMOKRŠĆANI) 54.210 6,32 %7 5 2
BOSANSKOHERCEGOVAČKA PATRIOTSKA STRANKA-SEFER HALILOVIĆ 35.223 4,10 %4 1 3
PATRIOTSKI BLOK BOSS - SDU BIH 27.200 3,17 %3 1 2
NARODNA STRANKA RADOM ZA BOLJITAK 27.132 3,16 %3 3
Results of the elections into the parliament of R October 2006S in October 2006Name of the party, number of votes, mandates, direct mandates, compensatory mandates:
SAVEZ NEZAVISNIH SOCIJALDEMOKRATA - SNSD - MILORAD DODIK 244.251 43,31 %41 32 9
SDS-SRPSKA DEMOKRATSKA STRANKA 103.035 18,27 %17 13 4
PDP RS - PARTIJA DEMOKRATSKOG PROGRESA REPUBLIKE SRPSKE 38.681 6,86 %8 6 2
DEMOKRATSKI NARODNI SAVEZ-DNS 22.780 4,04 %4 3 1
STRANKA ZA BOSNU I HERCEGOVINU 22.642 4,01 %4 1 3
SP-SOCIJALISTIČKA PARTIJA 20.031 3,55 %3 3
SDA-STRANKA DEMOKRATSKE AKCIJE 19.137 3,39 %3 1 2
SRPSKA RADIKALNA STRANKA REPUBLIKE SRPSKE 16.454 2,92 %2 2
SDP - SOCIJALDEMOKRATSKA PARTIJA BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE - SOCIJALDEMOKRATI BIH 14.079 2,50 %1 1
Is the endeavour of the international community to build the multiethnic society right/feasible?
Does BiH in its current shape have a future?
Would not be better to divide Bosnia? If Yes – How?
Would not be better to build nation states in the Balkans – Greater Serbia, Greater Croatia etc.?
Should the international community withdraw from BiH or stay?
What do u think about the US – stepping into the war, ending it and then withdrawing leaving the job on the EU?