Loading in 5 sec....

Making practical progress in parameterizing turbulent mixing in the deep oceanPowerPoint Presentation

Making practical progress in parameterizing turbulent mixing in the deep ocean

- By
**king** - Follow User

- 227 Views
- Uploaded on

Download Presentation
## PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Making practical progress in parameterizing turbulent mixing in the deep ocean' - king

**An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation**

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Presentation Transcript

### Making practical progress in parameterizing turbulent mixing in the deep ocean

Sonya Legg

Princeton University, NOAA-GFDL

The role of deep mixing in the general circulation in the deep ocean

Cooling

Pole

Eq

convection

overflows

Overturning

Upwelling

tidal mixing

Diapycnal mixing is necessary to close the thermohaline circulation: tides and winds are the likely source of energy for deep diapycnal mixing.

z

Climate models need physically based parameterizations of spatially and temporally varying tidal mixing: here we will focus on tidal mixing.

Tidal Energy Budget in the deep ocean

Munk and Wunsch, 1998

Most tidal energy is dissipated in coastal oceans, but the small amount dissipated in deep ocean has large impact on climate.

Different climate scenarios (e.g. raising/lowering sealevel) would have different dissipation patterns.

Mechanisms of tidal mixing in deep ocean in the deep ocean

- 1/3 of energy from ocean tides is dissipated in deep ocean.
- Used for mixing stratified ocean interior.
- Some mixing local to topography, e.g. mid-ocean ridges, seamounts
- Some energy carried throughout ocean by waves, leading to distributed mixing.

Barotropic tides

Rough topography

Internal tides

Local

mixing

Wave-topography

interactions

Wave-wave

interactions

Wave steepening

and breaking

- Unknowns
- How much energy is extracted from tides?
- How is it initially partitioned between waves and mixing?
- Where do waves eventually break and cause mixing?

Remote and

local mixing

Tidal energy flow chart.

Global climate models do not simulate any part of this chain of events, not just the final mixing.

Where does tidal mixing happen? in the deep ocean

Observations (Polzin et al, 1997) show interior mixing is concentrated over rough topography, e.g. mid-ocean ridges and seamounts

Evidence for tidal mixing over a knife-edged ridge: the Hawaiian Ocean Mixing Experiment (Klymak et al, 2005)

Diffusivity (estimated from measured dissipation) enhanced over ridge

Dissipation scales with M2 tidal energy flux (Klymak et al, 2005)

Governing parameters for tidal flow over topography Hawaiian Ocean Mixing Experiment (Klymak et al, 2005)

Topography: height h, width L, depth H

Flow: speed U, oscillation frequencyw

H

Others: coriolis f, buoyancy frequency N

Nondimensional parameters

h

Wave slope

L

Relative steepness

Relative height

Topography

Tidal excursion

Froude numbers

Flow

Analytical studies assume some or all of topographic/flow parameters are small – numerical simulations don’t have this restriction.

Internal tide generation by finite-amplitude barotropic tide Hawaiian Ocean Mixing Experiment (Klymak et al, 2005)

The relevant question for mixing parameterization purposes: how much energy is extracted from the barotropic tide?

- Early theoretical predictions (e.g. Bell 1974) assume gentle, low amplitude topography (g, h/H << 1).
- Recent numerical simulations (e.g. Khatiwala, 2003) and theory (e.g. St Laurent et al, 2003) examine how tidal conversion depends on finite steepness g and relative height h/H, for small amplitude flow.
- As energy conversion doubles in deep fluid.
- As h/H 1, energy conversion is further increased.

Khatiwala 2003

St Laurent et al, 2003

Knife-edge topography

Gaussian topography

Increasing g

Increasing h/H

Q: What happens when RL> 1, and Fr = U/(Nh) < 1?

Numerical simulations of finite amplitude tidal flow over Gaussian topography.

- Key questions for parameterization development:
- Do theoretical predictions hold for large amplitude flows?
- How much of converted energy is dissipated locally v. radiated away?

Low, wide, shallow topo

Low, narrow, steep topo

Tall, steep topo

Baroclinic velocity snapshots from simulations of tidal flow over Gaussian topo with forcing amplitude U0=2cm/s (Legg and Huijts, 2006; using MITgcm).

Steep topography leads to generation of internal tide beams: energy concentrated on wave characteristics.

Quantitative results: energy conversion Gaussian topography.

Rate of energy conversion from barotropic tide

Ratio of dissipation rate to conversion rate

St Laurent et al prediction for steep topo, h/H=0.5

Bell’s prediction

St Laurent et al prediction for steep topo, deep fluid

Low, wide topography; low, narrow topography; tall wide topography; tall narrow topography

Theoretical predictions of energy conversion agree well with numerical model results.

For wider topo, only 10% of energy extracted from tide is dissipated locally; for narrow topo, much greater fraction.

All from Legg and Huijts, 2006; using MITgcm

Probable cause of higher relative dissipation for narrowest topography: smaller vertical lengthscales in internal tide

Low wide shallow topo

Low narrow steep topo

Narrowest topo is the only case without energy peak at lowest vertical mode.

Tall steep topo

Tall steep narrow topo

(Legg and Huijts, 2006)

Observations of dependence of dissipation on topographic lengthscale

Mid Atlantic ridge has much less total internal tide energy flux than Hawaii, but similar levels at high mode numbers (m>10). Dissipation levels, especially at depth, are similar, suggesting dissipation is a function of energy in high modes.

St Laurent and Nash, 2004.

Are narrow beams the only location for dissipation/mixing? lengthscale

Low narrow steep topo

Tall steep topo

Dissipation is all in narrow beams, no hydraulic effects

Possible transient internal hydraulic jumps are a location for overturning

Isopycnal deflection by large amplitude tides: U0 = 24cm/s

Large amplitude forcing over large amplitude steep topo leads to local overturns in internal hydraulic jump-like features. (Legg and Huijts, 2006)

Q: Can internal hydraulic jumps be important at more moderate (i.e. realistic) forcing velocities?

Example of internal hydraulic jumps with realistic forcing, topography: Hawaiian ridge

Buoyancy field for U0=5cm/s, M2 tidal forcing.

Hawaiian ridge is tall and steep.

Hydraulic jumps develop over steep slope during downslope flow: at flow reversal, jumps propagate upslope as internal bores.

-700m

Asymmetric response: slope curvature is important.

-1760m

46km

Stratification and topography data from Kaena ridge courtesy of Jody Klymak and HOME researchers (Legg, 2006)

Transient hydraulics topography: Hawaiian ridge

We would expect an internal wave to be unable to propagate against the flow if

Group velocity is proportional to vertical wavelength

So we might expect the flow to be supercritical to internal tides of wavelength lz< lc. For Hawaiian ridge parameters, lc = 465m at U0=5cm/s, so we expect transient hydraulic control of features below this scale.

To have a hydraulic jump, flow must transition from supercritical to subcritical as it flows downslope, i.e. depth change within tidal period must be significant.

where

Depth change is significant if

i.e.

So transient hydraulic jumps may be possible if slope is sufficiently steep

Hawaiian ridge: Dependence of overturning on slope topography: Hawaiian ridge

dh/dx(max) = 0.2, smooth

dh/dx(max) = 0.2

Real topography

dh/dx(max) = 0.1

dh/dx(max) = 0.06

Snapshots of U(color) and buoyancy (contours) just after flow reversal, all with U0=5cm/s

Borelike features are found only for dh/dx(max) >> s, combined with a region of dh/dx = s at the top of the slope (Legg, 2006)

Dependence of overturning on flow amplitude topography: Hawaiian ridge

U0=2cm/s

U0=5cm/s

U0=10cm/s

Snapshots of U (color) and buoyancy (contours) just after flow reversal, for dh/dx(max) = 0.2.

Larger amplitude flow increases extent and vigor of overturning.

Influence of internal bores on dissipation topography: Hawaiian ridge

Log10 dissipation (time-averaged) for U0=5cm/s, dh/dx=0.2

Time-averaged dissipation for all simulations at location of maximum dissipation (h=-1170m)

The region affected by internal bores has an order of magnitude higher dissipation than the internal wave beams.

Steep slopes and large amplitude flows have largest dissipation.

Possible explanation of ``flow-reversal’’ mixing events (Aucan et al,2006) observed at mooring on Hawaiian ridge flank

Potential temp

dissipation

currents

Flow-reversal mixing event

Downslope flow mixing event

Summary of progress on internal tide generation and local mixing

- Recent theoretical advances in predicting energy conversion are supported by numerical simulations.
- Only 10% of this energy is dissipated locally for most topographies
- For very narrow topography dissipation is greatly enhanced and occurs mostly in internal tide beams.
- Transient hydraulic jumps can produce a local enhancement of dissipation and mixing, when steep slopes are combined with large amplitude flows, especially when combined with breaking at critical slopes.

Most of the baroclinic energy is in the form of radiating internal tides:

Q: What is their fate?

Fate of internal tides: 1. Wave-wave interactions: (a) Parametric Subharmonic Instability

MacKinnon and Winters, 2006

At latitudes where 2f < w(M2), PSI transfers energy into subharmonic with larger wavenumbers. When 2f = w(M2) (at 28.9 degrees) dissipation is greatly enhanced.

Fate of internal tides: 1. Wave-wave interactions: (b) steady-state continuum

Garret-Munk-like spectrum is steady state result of wave-wave interactions

(Caillol and Zeitlin, DAO, 2000)

E(w,k) ~ w-2m-2 for w >> f

Site D spectra

(Garrett and Munk)

(taken from Lvov et al, 2005)

Fate of internal tides: 2. Reflection from critical slopes: generation of internal bores

Wave breaking is induced by reflection from near-critical slope, i.e. when .

Buoyancy field for 1st mode internal tide

Numerical simulations demonstrate mixing is possible at all shapes of critical slopes, provided

200m

3km

Legg and Adcroft, 2003.

so that reflected wave Fr > 1.

Fate of internal tides: 3. Scattering from corrugated slope generation of internal bores

With corrugations, high mode structure seen in velocity profiles

Source: scattering of internal tide generated at shelf-break

Scenario: internal tide generated at shelf break, with tidal forcing U=10cm/s reflecting from continental slope: possible description of TWIST region (Nash et al, 2004)

Without corrugations

With corrugations

Cross-slope velocities at t=3.14 M2 periods

Cross-slope velocity profiles at x=60km

(Legg, 2004)

Tidal energy flow chart revisited…. generation of internal bores

Barotropic tides

Simulations show that only 10% of energy is dissipated locally, except for very narrow topography.

Rough topography

90%

10%

Internal tides

Local

mixing

Dissipation is located in beams and at near-critical slopes.

Wave-topography

interactions

Wave-wave

interactions

Simulations have shown where internal tides will break and cause mixing – on slopes near critical angle.

For slopes within a range of critical angle

PSI

Wave steepening

and breaking

Remote and

local mixing

Parameterizing tidal mixing in ocean models generation of internal bores

St Laurent et al, 2002, implemented in GFDL MOM by Simmons et al, 2004

Spatially variable diffusivity:

Where: q = fraction of energy dissipated locally – set to 1/3.

This should be a function of the horizontal length-scales of the topography.

G = mixing efficiency – set to 0.2 (this could be refined if DNS suggests it is necessary)

K0= constant background diffusivity, accounting for remote mixing: Need to account for spatial variations in remote mixing, e.g. internal tide breaking, PSI at critical latitude.

E(x,y) = energy extracted from barotropic tide:

F(z) = vertical structure function:

z = vertical decay scale – set to 500m.

Does not account for preferred locations of mixing: e.g. beams, critical slopes.

Example of current tidal mixing parameterization generation of internal bores

Parameterized diffusivity due to tidal mixing in S. Atlantic

(St Laurent et al, 2002)

Conclusions generation of internal bores

- Energetically consistent parameterizations of tidal mixing are now becoming a possibility. These parameterizations must include estimates of:
- Energy conversion from the barotropic tide;
- 2. The fraction of this energy used for local mixing and the spatial distribution of this mixing;
- 3. The internal wave field generated by the tides;
- 4. The locations of internal wave breaking, and the mixing thus generated.

Many questions still remain, and theoretical, observational and numerical work are all needed to answer them. But we mustn’t be afraid to use what we already know, however approximate, to improve climate models!

Download Presentation

Connecting to Server..