1 / 105

CHAPTER 22

CHAPTER 22. Hazardous Chemicals: Pollution and Prevention. An introduction to hazardous chemicals. Fish in Lake LeBarge, Canada, have become hazardous to eat because of high DDT levels Arctic fish, birds, and mammals have high amounts of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in their bodies

kineks
Download Presentation

CHAPTER 22

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CHAPTER 22 Hazardous Chemicals: Pollution and Prevention

  2. An introduction to hazardous chemicals • Fish in Lake LeBarge, Canada, have become hazardous to eat because of high DDT levels • Arctic fish, birds, and mammals have high amounts of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in their bodies • DDT, toxaphene, chlordane, PCPs, dioxins • The Inuit people have very high loads of POPs • How do these toxic chemicals reach remote areas? • There are no pesticides or industries

  3. Chemicals in remote areas • POPs are persistent, bioaccumulate, and biomagnify • They are carried to the Arctic in the air • They condense on the snowpack and enter water during the spring thaw • Plankton pick up the chemicals and pass them up the food chain • Highest amounts are in Arctic ponds near seabird nests • Feeding birds concentrate the chemicals, which are deposited to the land and water in guano

  4. Human exposure to chemicals • Three-fourths of Inuit women have PCB levels 5 times above safe levels • Caribou pick up dioxins in lichens and mosses • The Inuit eat the caribou • Some POPs are declining in the Arctic • Others are increasing and accumulating in polar bears, seals, and foxes • E.g., polybrominated diphenyl ethers—PBDEs • Effects include immune-system disorders, hormone disruptions, cancer, imbalances in births

  5. Dangers of chemicals • Significant dangers are associated with manufacture, use, disposal of many chemicals • Few people want to give up their products • The best solution? • Handle and dispose of chemicals in ways that minimize risks • Over the past 30 years, regulations on chemical production, transport, use, and disposal have mushroomed • The chemical industry is now heavily regulated

  6. Toxicology and chemical hazards • Toxicology: the study of the harmful effects of chemicals on human and environmental health • Toxicologists study acute toxicity effects, chronic effects, and carcinogenic potential • Data on toxic chemicals comes from • The National Toxicology Program (NTC) • The Chemical Repository • The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) • The EPA’s Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS)

  7. Dose response and threshold • The dose (level of exposure multiplied by the length of time of exposure) is linked with the response (effects) • If a chemical has a low toxicity, concern centers on chronic or carcinogenic effects • Human exposure to a hazard is a vital part of risk characterization • Exposure comes from the workplace, food, water, and environment • It is hard to get an accurate determination of exposure

  8. Threshold level • There is usually a threshold level in the dose-response relationship • Organisms can usually deal with some level of a substance without suffering ill effects • Threshold level: the level below which there are no ill effects • Effects above this level depend on concentration and duration of exposure • It is high for short exposures, and lower as time increases

  9. The threshold level

  10. Threshold levels for carcinogens • The EPA takes a zero-dose, zero-response approach for carcinogens • There is no evidence of a threshold level for them • But lower doses are less likely to produce cancers • The field of toxicology is well established • It is the most important source of sound science for supporting regulations from the EPA and FDA • The NTP was established in 1978 • The world’s leader in assessing chemical toxicity and carcinogenicity

  11. Chemical hazards: HAZMATS • Hazardous material (HAZMAT): a chemical that presents a certain hazard or risk (excluding radioactive materials) • Ignitability: substances that catch fire readily (gasoline) • Corrosivity: substances that corrode tanks and equipment (acids) • Reactivity: chemically unstable substances • May explode or create toxic fumes if mixed with water (explosives, sulfuric acid) • Toxicity: substances that are injurious when eaten or inhaled (chlorine, pesticides, etc.)

  12. HAZMAT placards

  13. Sources of chemicals • Total product life cycle: encompasses all steps in a material’s life from raw materials to disposal • Chemical wastes and by-products are inevitable • Over 80,000 chemicals are registered in the U.S. • They enter the environment at every stage • Chemicals enter the environment directly (e.g., fertilizers) • Parts are left behind (e.g., evaporation of solvents) • Through use (e.g., lubricants, solvents) • Through energy use (gasoline, coal, etc.) • Through accidents or spills

  14. Total product life cycle

  15. Federal legislation • Industry, small shops, and homes release chemicals • Toxic Release Inventory (TRI): provides an annual record of releases of 650 chemicals by 22,000 facilities • Total releases have declined by 61% since 1990 • The Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA—1986) • Industries must report releases of toxic chemicals to the environment • The Pollution Prevention Act (1990): mandates collection of data of chemicals treated on-site

  16. Toxic Release Inventory • Does not cover small businesses that release < 500 lbs/year • Also excludes gas stations and households • Over 3.2 billion lbs/year are released but not included • In 2007, the TRI released the following information: • Total production of toxic wastes: 24.2 billion lbs • Releases to the air: 1,311 million lbs • Releases to water: 237 million lbs • Releases to land disposal sites and underground injection: 2,538 million lbs • Total environmental releases: 4.086 billion lbs

  17. Toxic release inventory, 1988–2007

  18. The threat from toxic chemicals • All toxic chemicals are hazards that threaten humans • Many are broken down and assimilated • Two classes do not readily break down: • Heavy metals (lead, mercury, arsenic, cadmium, tin, chromium, zinc, and copper) and their compounds • Synthetic organics • If diluted enough in air or water, they may not pose a hazard

  19. Heavy metals • Are used in industry (metalwork, metal plating), batteries, and electronics • Were once used in paint, glazes, inks, dyes • Lead paint poisoned U.S. children; it was banned in 1978 • Heavy metals are extremely toxic • They can be soluble in water • If absorbed in the body, they interfere with enzyme functioning • Small amounts can cause severe consequences • Mental retardation, insanity, birth defects

  20. Organic compounds • Petroleum-derived and synthetic organics are the basis for plastics, fibers, synthetic rubber, paintlike coatings, solvents, pesticides, preservatives, etc. • Resistance to degradation makes them useful and dangerous • Are readily absorbed and interact with enzymes • But they cannot be broken down or processed • Acute effects: poisoning, death • Extended exposure leads to mutagenic, carcinogenic, teratogenic (causing birth defects) effects • Liver and kidney dysfunction, sterility, etc.

  21. Dirty dozen • Halogenated hydrocarbons: synthetic organics that contain halogens: chlorine, bromine, fluorine, iodine • Chlorinated hydrocarbons (organic chlorides): the most common halogenated hydrocarbons • Plastics, pesticides (DDT), solvents (carbon tetrachloride), insulation (polychlorinated biphenyls) • Most “dirty dozen” POPs are halogenated hydrocarbons • All are toxic and cause cancer in animals • Many are endocrine disrupters at low levels • Banned or restricted by the 2004 Stockholm Convention

  22. PERC • Perchloroethylene (PERC): a halogenated hydrocarbon • Colorless, nonflammable • Used in dry cleaning, as a solvent, in home products • Is carcinogenic to rats and mice • It easily enters groundwater from soil • Human exposure occurs in the workplace and from using home products • Dizziness, fatigue, headaches, unconsciousness, cancer • It is listed in NTP’s 2009 Report on Carcinogens as “reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen”

  23. Phasing out PERC • Dry-cleaning employees have higher rates of cancer and neurological impairment • EPA issued rules to phase it out by 2020 • Why is it taking so long? • The Obama administration will review these rules • The U.S. uses 370 million lbs/year • 10% from dry cleaners • The rest is used in making hydrofluorocarbons (which replace ozone-depleting CFCs)

  24. Halogenated hydrocarbons

  25. Issues with other organics • Phthalates: soften plastic (e.g., teethers, rubber duckies) • A possible reproductive hormone disrupter • It was banned in 2008 from children’s toys • Bisphenol A (BPA): used in plastics (e.g., baby bottles) • In animals: obesity, diabetes, infertility, cancer • 2008: the FDA declared it did not pose a health hazard • An FDA scientific advisory panel said the ruling was flawed

  26. Another organic • Perchlorate: in rocket fuel and other flammable products • Now in drinking water and food • Found in every brand of powdered infant formula tested • Interferes with thyroid gland function • The EPA refused to set a drinking water standard in 2008 • 20 million Americans are exposed to unsafe levels • Bush administration regulatory agencies chose lax or no rules for regulating controversial chemicals • The EPA also weakened TRI reporting rules • Obama favors stricter rules and regulations

  27. Involvement with food chains • Heavy metals and nonbiodegradable synthetic organics are hazardous because they bioaccumulate • Minamata disease occurred in Japan in the 1970s • A chemical company near the village discharged mercury into a river, which entered the bay • Mercury bioaccumulated and biomagnified • Cats fed fish suffered acute mercury poisoning: spastic movements, paralysis, coma, and death • Humans eating fish suffered the same symptoms, plus mental retardation, insanity, and birth defects; 50 died

  28. Hazardous-waste disposal • The Clean Air and Clean Water Acts ended disposal of hazardous wastes into the air and water • So companies turned to unregulated land disposal • Three land disposal methods were used in the 1970s • Without regulations or enforcement, groundwater contamination was inevitable • Deep-well injection: boreholes are drilled thousands of feet below groundwater into porous formations • A well contains pipes and casings that isolate wastes • The well is sealed at the bottom to prevent backup

  29. Deep-well injection • Wastes in wells react with natural material, leaving them less hazardous • Used for volatile organics, pesticides, fuels, explosives • 121 wells operate in the U.S. • Mostly in the Gulf Coast region • The EPA’s Underground Injection Control Program • Wells must be limited to geologically stable areas • 203 million lbs in 2007, but amounts have decreased • Wells can keep toxic wastes from contaminating water

  30. Deep-well injection

  31. Surface impoundments • Ponds: excavated depressions into which liquid wastes are drained and held • The least expensive, most widely used way to dispose of large amounts of water carrying small amounts of waste • Solid wastes settle; water evaporates • Impoundments can receive wastes indefinitely if: • The bottom is well sealed • Evaporation equals input of wastes • But storms can cause overflow, and evaporated materials can add air pollution

  32. Surface impoundment

  33. RCRA • The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (1996) prompted the EPA to study surface impoundments • The 2007 TRI reported 781 million lbs of toxics released to on-site (disposal by producers on their own facilities) surface impoundments • 18,000 surface impoundments exist at 7,500 facilities • Two-thirds of impoundments contain materials with carcinogenic and other human health concerns • Most impoundments are only a few meters above groundwater, and more than half lack liners

  34. People live near impoundments • Over 20 million live within 1.2 miles of an industrial impoundment • 10% are within 500 feet of a drinking-water well • 2%–5% of sites pose possible risks to human health • 24% pose a risk of release to the environment • Existing state and federal regulations should be enough to cover most impoundment-related problems • Gaps in regulatory coverage exist • Future regulations may be needed

  35. Landfills • RCRA sets standards for disposal of wastes in landfills • Concentrated liquids or solids are put into drums • Best-demonstrated available technologies (BDATs) • Treatment standards for wastes are set by the EPA • Reduce chemical toxicity and mobility • Technologies include stabilization and incineration, chemical oxidation, and other specific techniques • Only 23 landfills in North America receive off-site hazardous wastes • Received 403 million lbs in 2007

  36. Secure landfills • Secure landfill: a reasonably safe landfill that is lined • It also has a leachate-removal system • It is monitored and properly capped • But the barriers are subject to damage and deterioration • Surveillance and monitoring systems are needed to prevent leakage

  37. Secure landfill

  38. Mismanagement of hazardous waste • Early land disposal was not regulated • Deep wells injected wastes into groundwater • Abandoned quarries were used as landfills • Surface impoundments had no liners • A new enterprise was created: waste disposal • Many reputable businesses were formed • Midnight dumping: disreputable businesses pocketed fees, then illegally dumped wastes in abandoned warehouses, vacant lots, or landfills • The individuals responsible could not be found

  39. Midnight dumping

  40. Orphan sites • Orphan sites: some companies or individuals stored wastes on their own property, then went out of business, abandoning the property and wastes • Leaking drums could cause explosions and fires • Valley of the Drums (VOD): in Kentucky • One of the most famous abandoned sites • Love Canal, New York: brought the problem of unregulated dumping to the public’s attention • The absence of public policy made the situation worse

  41. Valley of the Drums

  42. Love Canal • A school and houses were built on top of a chemical waste dump • The surface collapsed, exposing barrels of chemical wastes • Fumes and chemicals seeped into cellars • People suffered birth defects and miscarriages • People demanded that the state do something • President Carter signed an emergency declaration in 1978 to relocate hundreds of residents • The school closed and homes were demolished

  43. Love Canal

  44. Occidental • Hooker Chemical and Plastics Company purchased an abandoned canal near Niagara Falls in 1942 • It filled the canal with 21,000 tons of hazardous waste • Hooker covered the canal with a clay cap and sold it to the school board after warning the board about the buried chemicals • Construction penetrated the cap, and rain leached chemicals • Occidental Petroleum (the parent company) paid $233 million on the cleanup and lawsuits

  45. Bad disposal practices were rampant • In the 1980s, the U.S. had 75,000 active industrial landfill sites, 180,000 surface impoundments, and 200 facilities that could contaminate groundwater • Most were small, but the total problem was immense • Thousands of contaminated water wells were closed • The problem was found only when people got sick • Problems of toxic chemical wastes occur in three areas: • Cleaning up the messes already created • Regulating disposal of wastes being produced • Reducing the quantity of hazardous waste produced

  46. Cleaning up the mess • Contaminated drinking water: a major public health threat • The first priority: ensure that people have safe water • Second: clean up or isolate the pollution’s source to prevent further contamination • The Safe Drinking Water Act (1974): the EPA set national standards to protect public health • Including allowable levels of specific contaminants • Maximum contaminant levels (MCLs): if contaminants exceed this level, the water source is closed • The EPA has jurisdiction over groundwater, too

  47. Groundwater remediation • Groundwater remediation: a developing technology used if toxic materials have contaminated groundwater • Techniques involve drilling wells, pumping out contaminated water, purifying it, and reinjecting it • Cleaning up the source of the water is mandatory • If contamination is severe, remediation may not be possible • Groundwater is considered unfit for drinking

  48. LUST remediation

  49. Superfund for toxic sites • The most monumental task we face is cleaning up tens of thousands of toxic sites • Mangers of operating sites were pressured to clean up • Many operators simply declared bankruptcy and abandoned their sites • The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA; 1980) • Known as Superfund • A trust fund that uses money from taxes on chemical raw materials

  50. CERCLA • The trust pays for identification of sites, protection and remediation of groundwater, and cleanup of sites • Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA; 1986): greatly expands the Superfund program • All sites cannot be cleaned up, so priorities must be set • All sites are identified, and threats to groundwater are determined • If no immediate threat exists, nothing else is done • If a threat exists, measures are taken to protect the public by isolating the wastes

More Related