1 / 62

Base Wage and Salary Systems

Base Wage and Salary Systems. Chapter 13. Chapter Overview. Objective of the Base Wage and Salary System Conventional Job Evaluation Pricing the Job Base Wage/Salary Structure New Approaches to the Base Wage/Salary Structure Summary of Learning Objectives. 13- 3. Base Wage and Salaries.

kimn
Download Presentation

Base Wage and Salary Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Base WageandSalary Systems Chapter 13

  2. Chapter Overview • Objective of the Base Wage and Salary System • Conventional Job Evaluation • Pricing the Job • Base Wage/Salary Structure • New Approaches to the Base Wage/Salary Structure • Summary of Learning Objectives 13-3

  3. Base Wage and Salaries • Hourly, weekly, and monthly pay that employees receive for their work • Make up largest portion of an employee’s total compensation • Often the focus of compensation system for employees • Form the foundation for most employees’ perceptions of the fairness, or equity, of the pay system • If employees do not perceive they are being fairly paid, many possible negative effects may result • Often reflects atmosphere of the entire organization • If perceived as being fair and equitable, organization is usually viewed in the same light • Reverse is also true 13-4

  4. Specific Policy Issues in Developing and Implementing a Base Wage and Salary Structure 13-5

  5. Objective of the Base Wage and Salary System • Primary objective – To establish a structure for equitable compensation of employees, depending on their • Jobs • Level of performance in their jobs • Most systems establish pay ranges for certain jobs based on relative worth of the job to the organization • An employee’s pay performance on the same job should determine where that employee’s pay falls within the job’s range • Key to a sound base wage and salary system • Pay range for a given job establishes a range of permissible pay, with a minimum and a maximum 13-6

  6. Objective of the Base Wage and Salary System • Establishing pay ranges involves two basic phases: • Determining relative worth of different jobs to the organization (ensuring internal equity) • Pricing the different jobs (ensuring external equity) • Job evaluation – Primary method for determining the relative worth of jobs to the organization • Wage surveys represent one of the most commonly used methods for pricing jobs 13-7

  7. Conventional Job Evaluation • Job evaluation – Systematic determination of value of each job in relation to other jobs in the organization • Used for designing a pay structure, not for appraising performance of employees holding the jobs • General idea is to • Enumerate requirements of a job • Job’s contribution to organization • Classify it according to its importance • While overriding purpose of job evaluation is to establish relative worth of jobs, it can serve several other purposes 13-8

  8. Conventional Job Evaluation • Gather information on the jobs being evaluated • Information is obtained from current job descriptions • If not, it is necessary to analyze jobs and create up-to-date descriptions • Identify factor or factors to be used in determining worth of different jobs to the organization • Frequently used factors are • Knowledge • Responsibility • Working conditions • Develop and implement a plan using chosen factors for evaluating relative worth of different jobs to the organization • Should consistently place jobs requiring more of the factors at a higher level in job hierarchy than jobs requiring fewer of the factors 13-9

  9. Conventional Job Evaluation • Evidence of a renewed interest in using job-focused approaches (primarily job evaluations) to compensation exists • Conventional job evaluation plans are variations or combinations of four basic methods: • Job ranking • Job classification • Point comparison • Factor comparison 13-10

  10. Potential Uses of Job Evaluations 13-11

  11. Job Ranking Method • Job evaluation method that ranks jobs in order of their difficulty from simplest to most complex • Simplest, oldest, and least often used job evaluation technique • Often, evaluator prepares cards with basic information about jobs and then arranges the cards in order of importance of positions • Produces only an ordering of jobs and does not indicate relative degree of difference among them • For example, a job with a ranking of four is not necessarily twice as difficult as a job with a ranking of two 13-12

  12. Job Classification Method (Job Grading) • Job evaluation method that determines relative worth of a job by comparing it to a predetermined scale of classes or grades of jobs • Certain classes or grades of jobs are defined on basis of differences in • Duties • Responsibilities • Skills • Working conditions • Other job-related factors • Methods is simple, but not always precise, since it evaluates the job as a whole • 5 to 15 classes will suffice • U.S. government has used the job classification method to evaluate all civil service jobs 13-13

  13. Point Method • Job evaluation method in which a quantitative point scale is used to evaluate jobs on a factor-by-factor basis • Historically been most widely used job evaluation plan in the U.S. • Advantage • Relatively simple • Reasonably objective • A quantitative point scale is developed for jobs being evaluated • One scale usually cannot be used to evaluate all types of jobs • The human resource department decides which jobs are to be included in a specific evaluation scale 13-14

  14. Point Method – Selection of Key Jobs • Key jobs (benchmark) represent jobs that are common throughout the industry or in general locale under study • Content of key jobs should be commonly understood • General idea is to select a limited number (20 percent is a good guideline) of key jobs that are representative of entire pay structure and the major kinds of work being evaluated • Selection of key jobs should adequately represent • Span of responsibilities • Duties • Work requirements • Key jobs may supply only a limited amount of data • Commonality and widespread acceptance of key jobs provide a basis for sound understanding and agreement • A full and detailed job description is necessary for each key job 13-15

  15. Point Method – Selecting Compensable Factors • Characteristics of jobs that organization deems important to the extent that it is willing to pay for them • Degree to which a specific job possesses these compensable factors determines its relative worth • Early approaches to job evaluation proposed a set of universal factors • Given set of factors—usually skill, responsibility, and working conditions—should apply to all jobs • Gradually replaced by approach postulating that each organization must tailor its compensable factors to fit its special requirements • Complete adoption of any set of universal factors is not recommended • Compensable factors selected for unionized jobs must be acceptable to both management and the union 13-16

  16. Point Method – Selecting Compensable Factors • Job subfactors – Detailed breakdown of a single compensable factor of a job • Used to describe compensable factors in more detail • Degree statements (profile statements) – Written statements used as a part of the point method of job evaluation to further break down job subfactors • Describe specific requirements of each subfactor • Breaking compensable factors into subfactors and degrees allows for a more precise definition of the job and facilitates evaluation 13-17

  17. Possible Subfactors and Degrees for the Compensable Factors of Responsibility, with Sample Jobs 13-18

  18. Point Method – Assigning Weights to Factors • Weights are assigned to each of the factors, subfactors, and degrees to reflect their relative importance • Weight assigned varies from job to job • Some systematic and helpful approaches exist for assigning weights, but there is no one best method • Both past experience and judgment play major roles • Weights are assigned on basis of maximum number of points for any job • This number is often decided arbitrarily • Points are then assigned to compensable factors, subfactors, and degrees based on their relative importance 13-19

  19. Sample Point Values 13-20

  20. Point Method – Assigning Points to Specific Jobs • After point scale has been agreed on, point values are derived for key jobs using the following steps: • Examine the job descriptions • Determine degree statement that best describes each subfactor for each compensable factor • Add total number of points • Point totals should present same general relationships that actual pay scales show for key jobs • Rank ordering of key jobs according to point totals should be approximately equivalent to rank ordering of key jobs according to pay • Serves as a check on appropriateness of points that have been assigned to degrees, subfactors, and factors • Nonkey jobs can be evaluated in the same manner • By determining appropriate points for each factor from the scale and then totaling points 13-21

  21. Possible Point Totals for Key Banking Jobs 13-22

  22. Point Method - Drawback • Amount of time required to develop point scale • Once a scale has been properly formulated for key jobs, it does not take long to evaluate remaining jobs • Efforts should always be made to keep system simple and easy for employees to understand 13-23

  23. Factor Comparison Method • Job evaluation technique using monetary scale for evaluating jobs on a factor-by-factor basis • Key jobs are selected • Rates of pay of key jobs be viewed as reasonable and fair to all those making evaluations • Compensable factors are then identified • Does not break down compensable factors into subfactors and degrees • Each compensable factor is ranked according to its importance in each key job • Done by assigning a rank to every key job on one factor at a time rather than ranking one job at a time on all factors • Proponents suggest that to validate rankings, they should be done once or twice at later dates without reference to previous rankings • After each key job has been ranked on a factor-by-factor basis • Allocate wage or salary for each job according to ranking of factors 13-24

  24. Factor Comparison Method • One of the selection criteria of a key job is that evaluators must view pay rate as reasonable and fair • Some proponents say that pay should be allocated without reference to factor rankings; others believe evaluators should refer to factor rankings when apportioning pay • Regardless, money allocation and factor rankings must ultimately be consistent • If discrepancies occur that cannot be resolved, job in question should be eliminated from list of key jobs • Monetary scale is prepared for each compensable factor • Each scale shows rank order of the jobs and establishes their relative differences in pay • Total worth of a given job is determined by adding dollar amounts assigned to each compensable factor 13-25

  25. Factor-by-Factor Ranking of Key Banking Jobs 13-26

  26. Sample Allocation Pay for Key Banking Jobs 13-27

  27. Monetary Scale for Responsibility Requirements in Banking Jobs 13-28

  28. Comparison of Job Evaluation Methods • Point and factor comparison methods – Commonly referred to as quantative plans • Since a number or dollar value is ultimately assigned to each job being evaluated • Numbers or dollars are assigned on the basis of degree to which job contains the predetermined compensable factors • Job classification and ranking methods – Called qualitative or nonquantitative techniques, compare whole jobs • Point system and the job classification system have a common feature • They evaluate jobs against a predetermined scale or class • Factor comparison and job ranking methods evaluate jobs only in comparison to other positions in the organization 13-29

  29. Advantages and Disadvantages of Different Job Evaluation Methods 13-30

  30. Pricing the Job • Factor comparison method of evaluation • Only conventional technique relating work of jobs to a monetary scale • Results are derived primarily from wage scale the organization currently uses • Job evaluation cannot be used to set wage rate • Provides basis for this determination • Information should be gathered to ensure external factors are recognized in wage scale • They include • Labor market conditions • Prevailing wage rates • Living costs 13-31

  31. Wage and Salary Surveys • Survey of selected organizations within a geographical area or industry designed to provide a comparison of reliable information on • Policies • Practices • Methods of payment • Advantages • Provide knowledge of market and ensure external equity • Can correct employee misconceptions about certain jobs • Can also have a positive impact on employee motivation • Wage or salary survey information can be obtained in two basic ways: • Conducting your own survey • Purchasing or accessing a wage/salary survey undertaken by another party 13-32

  32. Conducting a Wage/Salary Survey • To design a wage survey, jobs, organizations, and area to be studied must be determined, and also method for gathering data • If done in conjunction with either the point or factor comparison method or job evaluation • Key jobs selected are normally the ones that are surveyed • Rule of thumb is that a minimum of 30 percent of jobs in an organization should be surveyed to make a fair evaluation of organization’s pay system • When using the classification or ranking method • Organization should apply same guidelines followed for selecting jobs with point and factor comparison methods in choosing the jobs to be surveyed 13-33

  33. Conducting a Wage/Salary Survey • Geographic area, an industry type, or a combination of the two may be surveyed • Factors to be considered when defining scope of survey • Size of geographic area • Cost-of-living index for the area • Similar factors • Organizations to be surveyed are normally competitors or companies that employ similar types of employees • Desirable to survey important and most respected organizations • Three traditional methods of surveying wage data are • Personal interviews • Telephone interviews • Mailed questionnaires 13-34

  34. Conducting a Wage/Salary Survey • Personal interview • Most reliable and most expensive method • Mailed questionnaires • Probably used most frequently • Used only to survey jobs having uniform meaning all over industry • Responses may be unreliable if doubts concerning definition of job exist • Can be answered by someone not fully familiar with wage structure • Telephone method • Quick but yields incomplete information • May be used to clarify responses to mailed questionnaires • Internet • Inexpensive and quick • All companies are not reachable on Internet 13-35

  35. Possible Topics in a Wage Survey 13-36

  36. Purchasing or Accessing Wage/Salary Surveys • Consulting firms such as Mercer, Watson Wyatt, and PricewaterhouseCoopers have sold compensation surveys • These are usually relatively expensive • Potential sources for relatively inexpensive wage/salary • surveys include • The Bureau of Labor Statistics of U.S. Department of Labor • State and local governments • Trade associations • Chambers of commerce • Internet • Surveys available on the Internet fall into two broad categories • Surveys conducted by federal government • Surveys conducted by private research organizations, professional associations, employees’ associations, and consulting firms 13-37

  37. Sample of Web Sites for Wage/Salary Survey Data 13-38

  38. Pitfalls of Wage and Salary Surveys • If not done properly, they can yield very distorted and inaccurate information • Criticism center on the following points: • Too many surveys are being conducted • The quality of the resultant data is often questionable • Survey data are often difficult to interpret and use • Survey data can have a negative impact on merit pay plans • The use of such data can help fuel inflation 13-39

  39. Guidelines to Avoid Problems during Wage and Salary Surveys • Assess participating companies for comparability – Factors to be considered include • Size and type of business • Intangibles, such as • Prestige • Security • Location • Growth opportunity • Compare more than base wage or salary – Total compensation package, including incentives and benefits, should be considered • For example, a company might provide few benefits but compensate for this with high base wages and salaries 13-40

  40. Guidelines to Avoid Problems during Wage and Salary Surveys • Consider variations in job descriptions – Most widely acknowledged shortcoming of wage and salary surveys is that it is difficult to find jobs that are directly comparable • Usually more information than a brief job description is needed to properly match jobs in a survey • Correlate survey data with adjustment periods – How recently wages and salaries were adjusted before the survey affects the accuracy of the data • Some companies may have just made adjustments, whereas others may not 13-41

  41. Guidelines to Avoid Problems during Wage and Salary Surveys • Comparable worth theory holds that every job should be compensated on • Basis of its value to employer and society • Factors to be disregarded in this theory • Availability of qualified employees • Wage rates paid by other employers • Under this theory, wage surveys would have no value • Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that • Value of a particular job to an employer is only one of many factors that should influence rate of compensation for that job 13-42

  42. Problems Encountered When Using Salary Survey Data 13-43

  43. Wage and Salary Curves • Graphical depiction of relationship between relative worth of jobs and their wage rates • Used to indicate pay classes and ranges for jobs • Regardless of job evaluation method used, a wage curve plots the • Jobs in ascending order of difficulty along the abscissa (x-axis) and the wage rate along the ordinate ( y-axis) • To ensure that final wage structure is consistent with both the job evaluations and the wage survey data, it is desirable to construct and compare • One wage curve based on present wages • One based on survey data • Any discrepancies can be quickly detected and corrected 13-44

  44. Wage and Salary Curves • Points of graph not following general trend indicate • Wage rate for that job is too low or too high • The job has been inaccurately evaluated • Green-circle jobs • Underpaid jobs • Red-circle jobs • Wages are overly high • Discrepancies can be remedied by granting above- or below-average pay increases for jobs in question 13-45

  45. Wage Curve Using the Point Method 13-46

  46. Pay Grades and Ranges • Pay grades – Classes or grades of jobs that for pay purposes are grouped on the basis of their worth to an organization • Use of point method for evaluating jobs – Classes are normally defined within a certain point spread • Factor comparison method for evaluating jobs – A money spread can be used for defining grades • Pay range – Permissible pay range, with a minimum and a maximum, that is assigned to a given pay grade • Determined for each grade • Two approaches foe establishing pay grades and ranges exist • To have a relatively large number of grades with identical rates of pay for all jobs within each grade • To have a small number of grades with a relatively wide dollar range for each grade • Most pay structures fall somewhere between these extremes 13-47

  47. Pay Grades and Ranges • Ranges within grades are set so that distinctions can be made among employees within grades • Ideally, placement of employees within pay grades should be based on performance or merit • In practice, distinction is often based solely on seniority • On reaching the top of the range for a given grade • An employee can increase his or her pay only by moving to a higher grade • Not unusual for ranges of adjacent pay grades to overlap • Possible for an outstanding performer in a lower grade to earn a higher salary than a below-average performer in a higher grade 13-48

  48. Establishment of Pay Grades with Ranges 13-49

  49. Base Wage/Salary Structure • Each step in the process is influenced by organization’s current compensation policies • An organization’s compensation system should produce a base wage/salary structure that is both internally and externally equitable • Job evaluation process • Should ensure internal equity • Wage surveys • Should ensure external equity • Performance appraisal process is then used to position an individual employee within the established range 13-50

More Related