1 / 26

Care Plan (CP) Team Meeting Notes (As updated during meeting)

Care Plan (CP) Team Meeting Notes (As updated during meeting). André Boudreau (a.boudreau@boroan.ca) Laura Heermann Langford (Laura.Heermann@imail.org) 2011-05-04 (No. 12) Care Plan wiki: http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Care_Plan_Initiative_project_2011. HL7 Patient Care Work Group.

kim
Download Presentation

Care Plan (CP) Team Meeting Notes (As updated during meeting)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Care Plan (CP) Team Meeting Notes(As updated during meeting) André Boudreau (a.boudreau@boroan.ca) Laura Heermann Langford (Laura.Heermann@imail.org) 2011-05-04 (No. 12) Care Plan wiki:http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Care_Plan_Initiative_project_2011 HL7 Patient Care Work Group

  2. Agenda for May 4th • Preparation for WGM in Orlando • Care plan situations update (Susan) • MU material (Susan) • Care Plan elements from KP, Intermountain, VA, etc. (Laura) • Storyboards • Feedback on Chronic care Plan storyboard • New storyboard for acute care (Danny) • Modeling resource: Luigi: agrees to be our modeler: use case, data, process, UML • EA Vs Eclipse: EA is preferred by many • Next meeting agenda • For a future meeting: • Business requirements: summary of key aspects since February (André) • EA or Eclipse • Overarching term to use (Ian M.) • Care Plan Glossary

  3. Agenda for May 11th • Storyboards (Laura, Danny, Susan, André) • Requirements (André) • Include processes (Stephen’s work) • Include key functionalities (diabetes case) • Comparison of care plan contents (Ian) • To inform the information model • Start of spreadsheet • Finalization of Orlando WGM agenda (All) • Next meeting date and agenda • Later • EA or Eclipse • Overarching term to use (Ian M.) • Care Plan Glossary

  4. Participants- Meetg of 2011-05-04 p1

  5. Participants- Meetg of 2011-05-04 p2

  6. Orlando WGM

  7. Orlando WGM Topics • Thursday May 19th, Q1, 9h00 to 10h30 • Duration 1.5 hour • Who to lead: Laura • Potential Topics, to be finalized next week • Status of Care Plan DAM project • Identifying key material from other Patient Care work (Pressure Ulcer, DCM) and other WG (Emergency Care, Care Provision, Care Statement, Structured Document, CDA consolidation, etc.) • Requirements, include inventory of existing material and standards • Storyboard review • Identifying clinical resources that would review future storyboards • Modeling work required

  8. Care Plan Situations

  9. Care Plan Situations • See document prepared by Susan Campbell: Care Management Concept Matrix-v2-20110427a.xls • Identifies different types of care management and for each, presents characteristics from a provider and payer perspective as well as from a patient perspective • Matrix has some elements that are US specific. • Some columns could be added so that other country specific terms/types could be added • Next steps: postponed (Susan) • Add explanations and brief descriptions for the various types and characteristics (second worksheet added) • Add if possible another worksheet with vendors and roles

  10. Meaningful Use material

  11. MU Material (Susan) • MU aspects • Demonstrate that providers and institutions have EHR that have been certified • Have all patient records electronic • Interoperability can be verified • EHR can be used meaningfully to report • Health conditions that are most common are the ones targeted for the first phase • Use evidence based care to lower costs and improve patient outcome • 3 phases • Ph1: population health • By attestation that they can send the measures, one test to CDC; Use certified SW and have e-record • Ph2: similar but data reporting of the measures (80% of population) • Ph3: individual health: longitudinal measures for outcomes • Issue: finding common measures for all the segments • Document: HIT POLICY COMMITTEE MEASURE CONCEPTS • Document: Notes from Oct 20, 2010- Policy Committee meeting on Meaningful Use Phase 2

  12. MU Material • See SHIPPS DAM ballot material (Serafina, CBCC WG) • NQF E-Measures • Relation to Care Plan? • Identify specific items relevant to CP (Serafina, with Susan) • Care Plan has not entered yet the quality measures • A very key area of communication for quality care • Needs to be able to surveying ‘care plans’ • Important in the development of the Care Plan reference model • S&I Transition of Care initiative can influence our work and vice-versa

  13. Care Plan material from Various organizations

  14. Care Plan Material from Various Organizations • Laura: will contact KP • Info to ask for: • Care plan processes, guidelines (disease treatment models) • Criteria that a patient must exhibit in order to trigger the CP process • Key care plan contents /data elements • Data exchange between providers • PPOC summary in the CP comparison diagram is incomplete • Ask Ian to enrich it

  15. Care Plan Scope Question • The whole care perspective? • VS care plan communications among providers • Bottom up approach vs top down • Top down: EHR FM • Field approach: storyboards • Need to complete the storyboards • Restructure? Test our set of storyboards at the end with the following: • 3 age groups: newborns, adults, seniors • Types of care: chronic, acute, palliative, mental, behavioural, stay healthy, others?

  16. Storyboards

  17. Feedback on Chronic Care Plan Storyboard • Want to ensure • Readability • Clinical accuracy, validity • Coverage (focus on the 80%, not the exceptions) • Remember: storyboards get improved over time, as the project advances • By clinicians • As we progress in the progress • Ask the PC list/members

  18. Storyboards- Next week if possible • Acute Care Plan Storyboard: Danny • In progress • Home Care: André • Perinatology: Laura • Pediatric and Allergy/Intolerance: Susan • Stay healthy: Laura

  19. Modeling Tool- EA or Eclipse

  20. Includes post-meeting notes Modeling Tool to Use • Responses from Lloyd Mackenzie and Jean Duteau • Both use Enterprise Architect (EA) • Response from Andy Stechishin, HL7 Tooling and V3 Publishing co-chair • First, there is an active Tooling project (called MAX) to export information from EA using MIF, the HL7 official interchange format. • Second, at the WGM in Sydney, Sparx gave each attendee a license for EA. • Third, during my tenure as a co-chair of Publishing, most DAMs that have been submitted for ballot have been developed (or at least published) using EA. • It seems to me that a convergence is occurring and EA seems to at least be the tool of choice for many. • Eclipse is a platform for doing many different things using specific plug-ins • Recommended by HL7 • Open Source but not as intuitive as Enterprise Architect (which costs some 100$ for a desktop version) • However, choosing which tool and plug-in (for UML) to install is difficult for non technical folks (vs the easy-to-use EA) • We would need some coaching to allow a quick start • Adel agreed to help us there • André will find a resource • The tool will be used to do: • Use cases • Activity and workflow diagrams • Interaction diagrams • Class models

  21. Conclusion

  22. Action Items as of 2011-05-04 NB: Completed action items have been removed.

  23. Appendix

  24. Storyboard: what is it? Narrative of business (clinical; administrative) processes on domain/area of interest Non technical (conceptual in nature) Describes: Activities, interactions, workflows Participants High level data contents feeding into or resulting from processes Provides inputs for: Activity diagrams Interaction diagrams State transition diagrams High level class diagrams Stephen Chu 12 April 2011

  25. Storyboards • 5 to 10 max • See list on wiki • Identify actors and understand their roles • Understanding the care planning processes will help understand the needs for info exchange • E.g. query for resource availability vs the care plan needs for patient X • 3 types of requirements • Functions to be carried out, workflow, processes • Static semantics: info model, glossary, vocabulary • Functions to be carried out by the system: EHR FM, PHR FM, etc • Interactions between systems: interoperability • Include meaningful use items that are universal in perspective

  26. Requirements

More Related