1 / 15

Summary Feedback Day Two

Summary Feedback Day Two. Six Groups. Group One. Group One. Lack of personalization in the process Scrutinies are more personalized with participation of the candidate; rendiconto is more of a listening Signs of integrated paradigm

kieve
Download Presentation

Summary Feedback Day Two

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Summary Feedback Day Two Six Groups

  2. Group One

  3. Group One • Lack of personalization in the process • Scrutinies are more personalized with participation of the candidate; rendiconto is more of a listening • Signs of integrated paradigm • What a blessing when a community has some members coming from a different paradigm

  4. Group Two • Classical paradigm: received and being used – nevertheless comfortable in finding that there are other paradigms • Need to be using more the participative way, involvement of the formands • Another challenge being faced: how to have an integral paradigm for every member of the formation team? How can these members come to understand the other paradigms?

  5. Group Three • Question: where are you coming from? Vows seems not to be crucial for the resource person; instead the way we SDBs see the vows, they are the expression of the eschatogoloical sign • Formed: classical paradigm • Way doing formation: eclectic • Do we have a paradigm as a Congregation/as a region?

  6. Group Three • Shall we be adopting a paradigm?

  7. Group Four • Appealing paradigm: integral model; lifestyle is the following of Christ through the evangelical counsels • Lacking on the formation to justice and ecological concerns because we are not yet using the integral model • Sacramental model: non-christian environment, practice of the sacraments is a curiosity

  8. Group Four • What makes us different from the lay? Since vocation is a gift – a personal call, it does not matter whether we do the same thing – the call is what distinguishes

  9. Group Five • Religious life = hidden treasure: good paradigm • Need to find this treasure because to possess it is not enough; there is a need to develop it – bring it to life • This treasure is Jesus: need to follow Jesus, live his lifestyle, choose what Jesus chose

  10. Group Five • What Jesus lived was the chaste, poor and obedient life = thus, to live chaste, poor and obedient • What Jesus chose was the poor, the abandoned and for their sake he offered his life = thus we choose the poor and the abandoned and offer one’s life for them • Which paradigm? Primitive paradigm of Anthony of the Desert: fuga mundi - desert

  11. Group Five • Trinitate-fraternitate-caritate paradigm • Initiative comes from God: model is Jesus • Community • From community we are sent to mission • Mission is to bring people back to God • God-SDB-Young paradigm • God-SDB: coetera tolle

  12. Group Five • SDB-Young: Da mihi animas • Young-God: youth spirituality • At the heart of this paradigm: pastoral charity (C.10)

  13. Group Six • Did not feel well with the different paradigms • A lot of the traditional paradigm • Also a lot of mixture of the post-modern paradigm • Mission seems to be emphasized • God-centered mentality of older generation vs person-centered mentality of the younger generation

  14. Group Six • Happy about the session today

  15. Impressions • Different paradigm according to different stage of formation: e.g. novitiate – stress on person; other time of formation – stress on mission • Language in integral model: process • God in integral model: experience of God in all • Scrutiny/Rendiconto: reinterpreted more as a joint process

More Related