1 / 26

I ) Crystallization transition -- rheological change -- role of B.C.

z. U driving. W. x. Grains. Evolution of Sheared Dense Granular Flow Jerry Gollub . Haverford College & Univ. of Pennsylvania J.-C. Tsai G.Voth. I ) Crystallization transition -- rheological change -- role of B.C.

Download Presentation

I ) Crystallization transition -- rheological change -- role of B.C.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. z Udriving W x Grains Evolution of Sheared Dense Granular FlowJerry Gollub . Haverford College & Univ. of PennsylvaniaJ.-C. TsaiG.Voth I ) Crystallization transition -- rheological change -- role of B.C. -- ‘quantization’ effects II ) Non-unique final states -- ‘stochastic’ selection -- stabilization of disordered state III ) Quasi-static internal dynamics: crystallized vs. disordered states

  2. ~30d, ( Circumference ~ 800d ) Experimental Setup --cross-sectional view Normal load W >> beads’ total weight & fluid’s viscous drag --Glass beads: d = 0.6mm immersed in fluid --Driving: constant speed, fixed normal load --Fluid: index-matched fluorescent dye + laser sheet * Volume measurement (height of upper surface) ** Shear force measurement

  3. Movie : the initial state (with driving speed = 8 d/s)

  4. z Udriving W x Grains Vertical slice (XZ plane): Horizontal slice (XY plane): x I) Crystallization transition -- internal slices

  5. z Udriving W x Grains I) Crystallization transition -- movies XZ slice: XY slice (before trans.) XY slice (after trans.) (9hrs total @ ~900X)

  6. I) Crystallization transition-- time-resolved measurements The ordering transition results in step changes of granular volume (), shear force (), and particle speed (stronger decay downwards). ( -3 %) ( -15 %)

  7. I ) -- Role of boundary condition Final states (after a long steady shearing from above) with flat bottom or mono-layer bottom | bumpy bottom

  8. * Final volume: ** Degree of final ordering: (case of thin layers) Final states vs. Total mass (movies) 14 13 layers incomplete ordering 12 incomplete ordering I )-- “Quantization effects” (Volume quantization is found to exist for flows as thick as 23~24 layers!)

  9. I) Crystallization transition -- timescales & behavior of dry particles (Driven at the same speed:) (ii) Dry particles:  Ordering transition occurs, but takesmuch longer! {Fig.5, PRL 91,064301} (i) Dependence on layer thickness:

  10. Udriving W W Grains Grains II) Non-uniquefinal states Using a bumpy bottom: § Shearing with an oscillatory pre-treatment: First then drive back and forth by a few cycles; (102 d each way) continuously shear at a fixed velocity.

  11. II) --stochastic selection of final states (MOVIEs) 1 0 0 2 --- partial ordering

  12. II) --stochastic evolution (movies) 1 2

  13. II) -- stabilization of disordered state “Effectiveness” of partial ordering by oscillatory shear before the | after the long unidirectional shearing long unidirectional shearing

  14. II ) Non-unique final states Facts: * Both states can be stablized. * Transition is possible ONLY when uncompacted; preparation history matters. * Reversal of crystallization transition NEVER occurs. * Crystallized state: less shear force, stronger velocity decay, less dissipative.  “preferred state”  How is history ‘recorded’ in granular packing?  “Attractors ? ”

  15. III ) Quasi-static internal dynamics-- comparing velocity profiles

  16. III ) Quasi-static internal dynamics-- particle trajectories: xi(t) & yi(t) xi(t) 1d time yi(t)

  17. III ) Quasi-static internal dynamics-- yi(t): ordered vs. disordered states

  18. * ) Additional information Steady shearing of binary mixture (The r.m.s. size dispersion in the previous experiments is about 4%.) Binary mixture: (d=1.0 mm vs. 0.6 mm), (25% vs. 75%) by weight, with some of the 1.0 mm grains painted black as tracers. (~3000X Real time)

  19. Summary & Theoretical challenges(*) http://www.haverford.edu/physics-astro /Gollub/internal_imaging (1*) Shear flows can have non-unique final states. (2) For a nearly mono-disperse packing, rheology of cyrstallized state and disordered state are compared. (3*) Bothboundary condition and preparation history have profound effects on crystallization transition. the reversal of crystallization never occurs. Ref: PRL 91, 064301 (2003) & subsequent papers

  20. .. More info

  21. Temporary volume decrease induced by oscillatory shearing (of sufficiently compacted packing): Oscillatory driving –basic phenomena (1)

  22. z x III ) Oscillatory shear –basic phenomena (2) Instantaneous mean velocity Vx(t), measured at the same height: Disordered state Ordered state (dt ~ 0.05Td) (sudden drop Dh ~ d/5.)

  23. 3D structure of the velocity field

  24. After 2 weeks of steady shearing at a driving speed 12d/s: 3D structure of the disordered final state (partially ordered at sidewalls) Multiple horizontal slices (z = -H0/2  -1d ) Multiple vertical slices (y = W0/3 W0/6)

  25. III ) Quasi-static internal dynamics-- comparing velocity profiles (24 layers) (22 layers)

  26. z x (2) velocity profile & displacement timescales Time-averaged grain velocity of the ordered state (@~30X)

More Related