1 / 5

Recent progress and plans for Snowmass

Recent progress and plans for Snowmass. study dependence of vertex charge reconstruction on energy and polar angle results shown are for standard detector only, for Snowmass will compare with following geometries :

kele
Download Presentation

Recent progress and plans for Snowmass

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Recent progress and plans for Snowmass • study dependence of vertex charge reconstruction on energy and polar angle • results shown are for standard detector only, for Snowmass will compare with following • geometries: • detector with innermost layer removed, beam pipe radius 25 mm, thickness 1 mm • same as previous, with additional layer at 71 mm (as suggested by John Jaros) • detector with innermost layer moved to 8.5 mm, beam pipe radius 8 mm • SiD vertex detector geometry, inserted into TESLA global detector • for each detector, L/D cut optimised at 200 GeV, used at all energies • exception: 4 layer detector; there, it has been tried to use a seed decay length dependent • cut, which was shown to have a negligible effect (~ 1 permille shift in purity) • to calculate vertex charge, use L/D approach with ‘inner vertex’ information; • plot cos q for centre of mass energy range 50 GeV to 500 GeV

  2. L/D cut dependence in bins of seed decay length • decay length distribution peaks at • much shorter distances from the • IP for low than it does for high ECM •  at low ECM, performance more • affected by backround from IP • tracks and gluon splitting • left: l0 as function of L/D cut, • in four bins of seed decay length • optimal L/D cut decreases as • one moves away from the IP • dotted line: standard cut value

  3. Improvement obtained from variable L/D cut ? dependence of l0 on L/D cut flat over wide range of L/D in each Ldec bin  only first two Ldec bins show difference in l0 when moving from const to variable L/D cut for standard detector, change in resulting l0, integrated over Ldec, below statistical error

  4. Polar angle dependence at different CM energies • as ECM increases, jets • become narrower and • momentum is better • measured • probability of losing tracks • at the edge of the detector • decreases •  at higher energies, • performance stays excellent • out to large values of cos q

  5. Detector comparison • first results from detector comparison (standard, 4layer): • differences are mainly seen at low centre of mass energies (50 GeV to 200 GeV) • jets from the corresponding jet energy range are common in multijet events at the ILC • for detector comparison, average l0 values over cos q range 0 to 0.9 • at low energies, find ratio of averaged leakage rates l0 (4layer) / l0 (standard) ~ 1.3 • ratio between luminosities required to obtain equivalent results would be larger, • e.g. in events, for which vertex charge of two jets is measured, signal / background ratio • could improve by (1.3)2 ~ 1.7

More Related