1 / 14

Community Mobilization Model & Approaches

Community Mobilization Model & Approaches. Community. A group of people having something in common and will act together in their own interest -place they live -the people they work with -religious group - the people they go to school with. Community Mobilization.

keely-doyle
Download Presentation

Community Mobilization Model & Approaches

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Community Mobilization Model & Approaches

  2. Community • A group of people having something in common and will act together in their own interest -place they live -the people they work with -religious group - the people they go to school with

  3. Community Mobilization • A participatory and transformative process -Increases a community sense of ownership -Shifting communities from recipients to active planners in the health and wellbeing of its members -Strengthen and enhance community’s ability to work together

  4. Guiding Principles • Gender Equity • Youth Empowerment • Leadership, Responsibility, Accountability • Flexible, Adaptable, and Sensitive Approach • Community-Oriented • Results-Driven • Collective Emphasis • Respecting, Honoring, and Renewing Cultural Tradition • Streamlining, Mainstreaming and Integrating

  5. Community Mobilization Model

  6. Features of Effective Prevention Programs • Programs developed in collaboration with the target group (more effective than programs developed and delivered by outsiders) • Interactive activities (more effective than those that are aimed at information giving alone) • Programs that address multiple determinants of behaviour change (more effective than those that address only one)

  7. Features cont… • Programs that utilize a structured approach or curriculum (more effective than those without a well defined format) • Programs involving multiple contacts with the same participants (more effective than one time only programs)

  8. Commonly used Approaches • Community Conversations • Peer education • Counseling • Focus Group Discussion • One on One • Theatre • Mass activities

  9. Community Conversations Strengths Weaknesses • Diverse opinions or views • Diverse target group • Participants free to participate • Address multiple topics (underlying factors) • Effective in collective change of community norms • Encourages openness (common language & setting) • Dominance by other members

  10. Peer Education Strength Weaknesses • Encourages openness due to trust • Same level of understanding of issues • Influences behaviour change • Stimulates collective action • Helps to keep the “WE” feeling • Promotes a sense of belonging • Dominance by other members

  11. Focus Group Discussion Strength Weakness • Economical & effective • Yields lively interaction leading to discussion & debate • Allows participants to formulate opinions • Common understanding of issues • Promotes a sense of belonging • Dominance by other members e.g by peer educator / member

  12. One on One Strengths Weaknesses • Encourages openness • Able to establish trust (confidentiality assured) • Non verbal communication • Allows for probing • Time consuming • Can encourage dependency

  13. Theatre Strengths Weaknesses • Edutainment (reducing boredom) • Depicts real life situations • Message easily remembered • No interaction (unless there are follow up activities)

  14. Mass activities Strengths Weaknesses • Pulls a large number of participants • Once off event • Challenges in following up participants • Main message not well taken by participants

More Related